LJo said:It's a bit dangerous to criticise something you never actually read.

I do read it, when I find a copy in my local greasy spoon cafe or on the tube. And pretty much every time it conforms utterly, deadeningly to type.LJo said:I always find it useful to know what the enemy is thinking.
It's a bit dangerous to criticise something you never actually read.
Ace said:Paul Dacre, and many media analysts, may beg to differ, William.
They might say that the Daily Mail is very cleverly targeted specifically at the lower middle class; that it addresses what they really think, tickles their particular quirks and preoccupations and flatters their sense of superiority.
They might say that the particularly skilfull way it does that - knows the British lower middle class inside out - is largely responsible for its success.
I would say, fair play to them, that most of the "New" Young Urban posters will not be sharing these prejudices; that they find petty minded, xenophobic, parochial and bloody unfair!
I think they are revolted at the mean-spirited fascism-lite of the Mail's ideology.
I also think they would absolutely hate to live in the sort of homes most Daily Mail readers live in. Non-descript, slightly apologetic, resolutely suburban terraces around the outskirts of major cities. They would hate the decor, the remanants of chintz, the Hyacinth Bucket satorial sense, whatever it is that's the modern equivalent of ducks on the wall.
Most of the young 20 something radicals on this board are instinctively repelled by this sort of thing and will want to put as much distance between them and it, once they've acquired their modest but elegant townhouses in Kentish Town and "Stokey"![]()

please excuse those of us who want to fend off endless banality, creative voids and vacant minds. We're snobby like that.Ace said:I also think they would absolutely hate to live in the sort of homes most Daily Mail readers live in. Non-descript, slightly apologetic, resolutely suburban terraces around the outskirts of major cities. They would hate the decor, the remanants of chintz, the Hyacinth Bucket satorial sense, whatever it is that's the modern equivalent of ducks on the wall.

Cloo said:'Women's' section entirely dedicated to dieting? Check
Article about threats to house prices/savings/pensions of 'honest, hard-working Britons'? Check
Article claiming yet another reason why women shouldn't work or have any fun? Check
Article complaining about 'freeloading' immigrants? Check
Tricky Mickey said:Dear Daily Mail,
It has come to my attention that Tube drivers are actually paid for the hours they work underground. How can this be right? These sponging moaning minnies already get free transport tickets for themselves and their no-doubt "homosexual" sex partners. What next? Overtime payments?
There are thousands of decent, ordinary British people who have just about had enough of this government's namby-pamby nanny-state approach to the unions. It's time to storm the barricades, cross the picket lines and make ourselves heard.
Mr Blair, you betrayed me.
Elsie Buscador, commuter

Tricky Mickey said:Dear Daily Mail,
It has come to my attention that Tube drivers are actually paid for the hours they work underground. How can this be right? These sponging moaning minnies already get free transport tickets for themselves and their no-doubt "homosexual" sex partners. What next? Overtime payments?
There are thousands of decent, ordinary British people who have just about had enough of this government's namby-pamby nanny-state approach to the unions. It's time to storm the barricades, cross the picket lines and make ourselves heard.
Mr Blair, you betrayed me.
Elsie Buscador, commuter

chegrimandi said:cleverly targeted or not its still an overtly bigoted pile of shite that knowingly and purposefully peddles lies and untruths, and encourages bigotry of every kind- it deserves denouncing and ridicule at every possible opportunity. Like most mainstream newspapers.