fractionMan
Custom Title
Someone just called a pot with two already all-in callers with JQo.
Thankfully my AA held up
Thankfully my AA held up


fractionMan said:buy in is only 7 + 0.50 bucks, so no great dent in your wallet![]()

What's your screen name?MightyAphrodite said:well thats not bad at'll....im buying in now...i just hope i dont forget to play in 40 minutes![]()
![]()
fractionMan said:


fractionMan said:unlucky![]()


MightyAphrodite said:the bleeping sounds were just too much!


fractionMan said:lol
I managed to double up when someone went all in against my full house.![]()

fractionMan said:Well I've played a grand total of 2 hands so far, and one of them was from the BB.

I had nothing but AK to a rag flop.

ymu said:On AI, there are already a lot of bots playing - but they're not usually very good, and the sites catch them fairly easily because of the identical pre and post flop stats (WPEX just lost half it's player base cleaning out the bots). It'll be interesting to see how this program does under different conditions (short, deep etc), and whether it would adjust well to tournament situations.
Just reading poker forums, cardplayer etc.You must have heard of RaiNKhaN (Hevad Khan, just made the final table of the WSOP ME, came 6th I think) who got his account suspended on Party Poker for being a robot because noone believed he could play 26 tables as fast as he does - he made a video to get his money back:fractionMan said:How do you know this? I would be interested to find out more.
The regulars at WPEX have been complaining that the games are less profitable since the bots got banned - so far they're all too predictable and easy to exploit - but no doubt they are good at exploiting the fish. Plus I don't think they could ever match a human player for reading their opponents - knowing which ones will call a huge overbet AI with 2nd pair and which ones will bluff all their chips off if you check to them is easy enough (although bots don't seem to exploit this knowledge much), but knowing which ones will do it again and which ones you need to change tack with is something else.fractionMan said:Interesting. I just found this. http://www.winholdem.net/ A programmable poker bot.
I read about this earlier. I've been following it so far. Interesting to see how the other bloke does too.ymu said:Man vs Machine Poker Championship
Phil Laak and Ali Eslami are playing two sets of 500 hands, 10/20 limit, against a new poker playing program. They're playing the same sets of cards twice (so Ali gets the cards against the bot that the bot got against Phil, and vice versa) to compare results. Should be interesting. Ali is +600 half way through the first match, but it's been up and down.
fractionMan said:Some one called my AA re-raise shove to a Q rag rag rainbow flop with Q3, making top pair 3 kicker. Of course, he hits the 3 on the river for two pair and I'm down a buy in.
Thankfully, it's that kind of donkish move that makes me my money the 80% of the time I should win. But still... Q3o... Are You Mental?