Teacher sacked for wearing trainers!!
- Thread starter West_Ham_Wham
- Start date
Bollocks, the union gives out an official document as required by law with the resolution, number of votes for and against and total membership.
Fact... your drivel is agitprop in an attempt to confuse the issue, no more, no less.
You are totally unaware of the legal requirement and the official forms used by the Union.
Well done.
Fact... your drivel is agitprop in an attempt to confuse the issue, no more, no less.
You are totally unaware of the legal requirement and the official forms used by the Union.
Well done.
belboid
Exasperated, not angry.
No it isn't, it is a simple statement of facts. the union does indeed give out an official doc with all the relevant figures you mention, but it has absolutely no legal requirement to always quote all those figures in press releases etc.
fact - your nonsense is an rubbish attempt confuse the issue, no more, no less. Adrians case is overwhelmingly supported by his colleagues and all your bluster cannot deny that.
fact - your nonsense is an rubbish attempt confuse the issue, no more, no less. Adrians case is overwhelmingly supported by his colleagues and all your bluster cannot deny that.
belboid
Exasperated, not angry.
god, your stupidity goes to new levels!
Are you really that dim, or just being wholly disingenuous.
Just to explain for the unbelievably hard if thinking (ie the ironically named 'Descartes'). I posted the percentages of those voting for strike action, as stated in a union press release. Descartes disputes them for not giving the actual figures of voters. He then raises the entirely irrelevant fact that the union has to give the employers said actual voting figures, and uses that to say that the figures I quoted are therefore false.
I'm sure everyone capable of rational thought can see through the paucity of Descartes' argument, its basic dishonesty, and the ludicrousness of his attempts to labour the point.
Are you really that dim, or just being wholly disingenuous.
Just to explain for the unbelievably hard if thinking (ie the ironically named 'Descartes'). I posted the percentages of those voting for strike action, as stated in a union press release. Descartes disputes them for not giving the actual figures of voters. He then raises the entirely irrelevant fact that the union has to give the employers said actual voting figures, and uses that to say that the figures I quoted are therefore false.
I'm sure everyone capable of rational thought can see through the paucity of Descartes' argument, its basic dishonesty, and the ludicrousness of his attempts to labour the point.
Of course we can. Don't know why you bother with him - he's clearly just trolling.
He'll start going on about agitprop again now, you watch. Very funny
Good point, I'll stop now then
(tho I have quite enjoyed showing the irony of someone calling themselves Descartes being completely and utterly unable to think)
He's a funny looking fella too
So typically left wing, nobody must question the party line, the party policy or the very doubtful figures..
The first figures of 22/25 etc clearly display a total ignorance of the number of teacher at the school. To quote percentage and avoid any realistic figures of number of voters clearly and decisively display a complete and utter lack of intent to clarify and publish the realistic figures.
By your own admission you are an acquaintance of the dismissed teacher and have chosen to refrain from putting into the public domain the concise figures of his ex-colleagues that have chosen to take part in the poll.
You hid behind name calling sooner than address the very basic and fundamental head count of voters. This epitomises the rank disregard for any clarity or understanding of the situation.
The temporary head was employed to stop the school being closed, the number of teachers losing their jobs has been indicative of the measures necessary to raise the standard of teaching to comply and meet with the OFSTED inspection and also qualify for Buidling schools for the future grants.
Now, you may believe that the future of one solitary teacher has greater significance than the future and welfare of the 990 pupils, the large number of staff and associated work force within the present school.
The new school and the intended expansion will accommodate a greater number of pupils, offer greater facilities for the specialist subjects and, hopefully, move the standard of Education within the Tower Hamlet borough to improved levels.
Before you seek to denigrate anyone not holding your views and your own refusal to supply the very basic information as to a head count you would realise that education within the school and borough can only improve, and that is without a Math teacher who, apparently, was an inherent part of a failing school.
You can rant and call names but that does not alter the facts of a decided lack of clarity with the voting issue.
The first figures of 22/25 etc clearly display a total ignorance of the number of teacher at the school. To quote percentage and avoid any realistic figures of number of voters clearly and decisively display a complete and utter lack of intent to clarify and publish the realistic figures.
By your own admission you are an acquaintance of the dismissed teacher and have chosen to refrain from putting into the public domain the concise figures of his ex-colleagues that have chosen to take part in the poll.
You hid behind name calling sooner than address the very basic and fundamental head count of voters. This epitomises the rank disregard for any clarity or understanding of the situation.
The temporary head was employed to stop the school being closed, the number of teachers losing their jobs has been indicative of the measures necessary to raise the standard of teaching to comply and meet with the OFSTED inspection and also qualify for Buidling schools for the future grants.
Now, you may believe that the future of one solitary teacher has greater significance than the future and welfare of the 990 pupils, the large number of staff and associated work force within the present school.
The new school and the intended expansion will accommodate a greater number of pupils, offer greater facilities for the specialist subjects and, hopefully, move the standard of Education within the Tower Hamlet borough to improved levels.
Before you seek to denigrate anyone not holding your views and your own refusal to supply the very basic information as to a head count you would realise that education within the school and borough can only improve, and that is without a Math teacher who, apparently, was an inherent part of a failing school.
You can rant and call names but that does not alter the facts of a decided lack of clarity with the voting issue.
chilango
Ha! Ha! Armageddon
belboid
Exasperated, not angry.
Not if you're any good at maths they're not. Or is you understand the meaning of 'or multiple thereof'
just for that school or boro wide?
Unbelievable. This ^^ is why people have a poor opinion of teachers. And this scruff Swain should be struck off for troublemaking and grandstanding. 5 day strike cos he wont wear decent shoes. ffs
tangentlama
Nameless voices crying
5 day strike cos he wont wear decent shoes. ffs
detention for not buttoning your collar? how ridiculous Britain's schools becoming. fussing over petty things like clothing.
Similar threads
- Poll
