Teacher Banned for Life from Classroom. Excessive?

[8ball]

Jesus

Alan!

 

[SpookyFrank]

I really hope this guy is just a troll and doesn't actually believe this shit.

Either way there seems to be nothing we can do to get the message across here, so I'm off.

 

[killer b]

When do we get to burn someone?

About now by the looks of it.

 

[8ball]

He's sexually harassed vulnerable children in his care. That's a do-not-pass-go, never allowed to work with kids again offence and there are very good reasons why that is the case.

Yeah, if you look at the details I don't think many parents would feel very good about him teaching at their school.

Screaming 'nonce' at the OP for another few hours is sure to fix this misconception.

 

[SpookyFrank]

Screaming 'nonce' at the OP for another few hours is sure to fix this misconception.

Maybe just putting the OP on ignore will make him go away, and thus solve the problem.

 

[butchersapron]

When do we get to burn someone?

Content free accusative post.

 

[8ball]

Content free accusative post.

Accusatory. HTH. HAND.

 

[killer b]

The dude does keep posting noncey threads tbf. It isn't an unreasonable conclusion to come to.

 

[butchersapron]

When do we get to burn someone?

There are many posts (paedo freedom posts) like this of yours. It's relentless.

Shit, i forgot, i'm not a worthwhile part of the dialogue. I want to burn someone alive. That leaves the floor to you and kesher 8ball.

 

[maomao]

Accusatory. HTH. HAND.

Actually the word 'someone' was accusative.

 

[8ball]

There are many posts (paedo freedom posts) like this of yours. It's relentless.

Shit, i forgot, i'm not a worthwhile part of the dialogue. I want to burn someone alive. That leaves the floor to you and kesher 8ball.

There are many reasons why you are not a worthwhile part of the dialogue. Maybe a strong coffee would help.

 

[butchersapron]

There are many reasons why you are not a worthwhile part of the dialogue. Maybe a strong coffee would help.

The idea that people you disagree with on here want to burn you alive is as fanciful as calling you a determined paedo-enabler. You think one of these approaches is fine and dandy.

 

[J Ed]

The dude does keep posting noncey threads tbf. It isn't an unreasonable conclusion to come to.

He keeps posting threads defending 'peripheral' paedophile behaviour, seemingly in an attempt to rationalise or justify this behaviour. Sort of like how a neo-Nazi might start out talking about immigration levels or Israeli foreign policy rather than jumping straight to racial purity and eugenics.

 

[8ball]

The idea that people you disagree with on here want to burn you alive is as fanciful as calling you a determined paedo-enabler. You think one of these approaches is fine and dandy.

I think you need to read back a bit. Really.

OP could be anything from not-thought-through-hasn't-read-the-details to someone with very iffy attitudes about child protection (to say the least). Shouting 'nonce' at them will make them go away, I'm sure, if it doesn't lead to a verbal retaliation that can be used to justify a ban.

I'm finding the whole group bonding thing a little tired, though.

 

[bemused]

Both girls were adults at the time; consented to it; were not students of his at the time and were probably already having sex. He may have been a good teacher; but now that's been removed from him, permanently. Some would argue that's extremely harsh.

If you read that article I don't think it's the sex with adults that lead to his being barred, it was his attempts to seduce 17 year old former students and their friends. The fact he had successfully seduced a former student and her friend was just supporting evidence.

 

[butchersapron]

I think you need to read back a bit. Really.

OP could be anything from not-thought-through-hasn't-read-the-details to someone with very iffy attitudes about child protection (to say the least). Shouting 'nonce' at them will make them go away, I'm sure, if it doesn't lead to a verbal retaliation that can be used to justify a ban.

I'm finding the whole group bonding thing a little tired, though.

I don't need to read anything from the op to see you suggesting others want to burn people.


And hence their motivation for posting.

 

[brogdale]

Both girls were adults at the time; consented to it; were not students of his at the time and were probably already having sex. He may have been a good teacher; but now that's been removed from him, permanently. Some would argue that's extremely harsh.

In perceiving this action as 'extremely harsh', I think you're find you're in a very, very small minority.

As an active unionist/rep. at the time when the professional standards were imposed I had (and have) grave reservations about a code of conduct that imposes restrictions upon the personal conduct of teachers outside of the school environment; it always appeared to offer employers far too much latitude to persecute 'troublesome' colleagues unwilling to conform to conservative norms.

That said, any teacher engaging in a sexual relationship with a pupil/former pupil is exploiting a very asymmetrical power relationship; expressed very well (above) by Campanula.

This individual showed very clearly that he was prepared to use his position of trust to fulfil his sexual desires, and the action taken is entirely appropriate.

 

[maomao]

He keeps posting threads defending 'peripheral' paedophile behaviour, seemingly in an attempt to rationalise or justify this behaviour. Sort of like how a neo-Nazi might start out talking about immigration levels or Israeli foreign policy rather than jumping straight to racial purity and eugenics.

Exactly. If it was just issues surrounding teachers then it could be a teacher worried about the change in policies but given that they've come at this one from several different angles then they seem solely concerned with defending paedophiles.

 

[J Ed]

So let them [paedophiles] wank: they are not harming children

I quite often call my Thai wife a brown arsed bitch

 

[maomao]

I met my Thai wife at a Pattaya bar in June 99: I paid her £10 to fuck the arse off her all night whilst on poppers. I am 19 years older than her; but we are still together.

 

[Orang Utan]

Burn him

 

[8ball]

I don't need to read anything from the op to see you suggesting others want to burn people.

And hence their motivation for posting.

The motivation for disagreeing is obvious. The motivation for calling nonce from the second post is the usual Urban pant-hooting.
Fortunately there are some reasoned voices too.

 

[J Ed]

The motivation for disagreeing is obvious. The motivation for calling nonce from the second post is the usual Urban pant-hooting.
Fortunately there are some reasoned voices too.

Can you explain the OP's predilection for defending paedophile behaviour?

 

[8ball]

Can you explain the OP's predilection for defending paedophile behaviour?

I wasn't particularly quibbling over whether you've found a real witch or not.

 

[J Ed]

 

[Pickman's model]

There was a bit more to it than that if you read the article.

And I wouldn't trust you anywhere near kids.

Kesher not kosher

 

[butchersapron]

I wasn't particularly quibbling over whether you've found a real witch or not.

Just if paedos exist. Picked a good one here. What a ground to make your stand on.

 

[Spymaster]

The idea that people you disagree with on here want to burn you alive is as fanciful as calling you a determined paedo-enabler. You think one of these approaches is fine and dandy.

I don't need to read anything from the op to see you suggesting others want to burn people.

The "burn" comment was quite obviously figurative.

 

[butchersapron]

The "burn" comment was quite obviously figurative.

So? And that's the whole point btw.

 

[Spymaster]

The motivation for calling nonce from the second post is the usual Urban pant-hooting.

He's got form though.