Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

SWP refuse to debate Tatchell .. LOL

not really, the FA are the BNP for people who went to public school

the founder, Norris Mcwhirter was an active apartheid supporter

as was former FA council member John Bercow who as chair of the monday club campaigned for voluntary repatriation

and another previous FA council member Viscount Massereene and Ferrard has stated on record: “If you say I am a racist, yes I certainly am, and proud of it.”

the FA accepted funding from the south african apartheid regime and ran blacklists of trade union organisers which were sent to potential employers

The Freedom Association’s policies include closing down public sector pension schemes, making all public services dependent on private insurance payments, and banning public sector strikes.
 
would you include people who are anti-immigration and pro-repatriation, who believe in the end of state subsidised public services to be completely replaced by the private sector (which economically is as far to the right as you can get) and an end to workers having the freedom to form unions?
 
would you include people who are anti-immigration

No, otherwise at least two-thirds of the British public would count as 'Far Right'.

smokedout said:
and pro-repatriation

Repatriation of whole ethnic groups, yes obviously.

smokedout said:
who believe in the end of state subsidised public services to be completely replaced by the private sector (which economically is as far to the right as you can get)

No. Virtually all groups described as Far Right have collectivist aspects to their beliefs.

smokedout said:
and an end to workers having the freedom to form unions?

That always comes as part of the Far Right package in practice, so yes.

But does the Freedom Association endorse all those four policies anyway? And are you not mistaken when you claim that Peter Tatchell was happy to share a platform with the Far Right?
 
former members of the FA have called for repatriation of blacks and asians but much like the BNP they are attempting drop overt racism and seek credibility

dont forget they were largely funded by the apartheid regime in south africa

Virtually all groups described as Far Right have collectivist aspects to their beliefs.

not quite that simple, id say the most groups described as fascist have a collectivist aspects to their beliefs but like anarchism and communism could both be termed far left there are more aspects to the far right than fascism

a completely liberalised economy a la milton friedman/pinochet is a right wing policy. if the tories currently represent the centre right, wanting to keep the nhs etc then i dont think its unfair to call the neo-liberals far or at least hard right

added to this the freedom association has an absolutely proven track record of anti-union activity

so an extreme right wing economic position, a background of racism, support for repatraition and apartheid and active anti-union activity

i think the term far right is fair, i didnt call them fascists

the March for Free Expression was largely organised by the FA and Tatchell cose to speak at it with the full knowledge of that
 
i think the term far right is fair, i didnt call them fascists

I appreciate your distinction, and would see the Freedom Association as being on the hard or nationalist right of the Conservative Party certainly, and acting on Enoch Powell's dictum that "the Conservative Party is nationalist or it is nothing".

But by 'Far Right', I understand groups outside the Conservative Party with these features:

1. A radical rather than conservative stance towards existing institutions and constitutional arrangements, eg the rule of law, parliament etc.

2. Race or 'ethnic genetic interests' as the primary social fact and competition between races as the main dynamic in history. (Like class is for Marxists.)

3. A powerful and violent State which acts without restraint against its opponents.
 
I appreciate your distinction, and would see the Freedom Association as being on the hard or nationalist right of the Conservative Party certainly, and acting on Enoch Powell's dictum that "the Conservative Party is nationalist or it is nothing".

Most of the people involved in the FA are not members of the conservative party but more commonly ukip
2. Race or 'ethnic genetic interests' as the primary social fact and competition between races as the main dynamic in history. (Like class is for Marxists.)

the FA was founded primarily on apartheid money and actively campaigned on the SA states behalf

3. A powerful and violent State which acts without restraint against its opponents.

The FA were also active supporters of pinochet and some were involved in a failed coup to attempt to bring a similiar regime to the uk

i take your point and the FA certainly try to present a different face to thew world than they did but throughout their history they have had members who have flirted with extreme nationalism or more traditional fascist organisations

the FA for example have actively promoted Right Now (and still link to the defunct website) which was edited by out and proud nazi derek turner and one of the FA's founders (John Gouriet) was involved in the Conservative Democratic Alliance which also included Adrian Davies, a member of BNP splinter group the Freedom Party and barrister for david irving

so whilst i wouldnt call the FA specifically fash' they certainly have members who have flirted with fascism and could be considered fellow travellers

as did the conservative party until IDS expelled the monday club (although IDS himself had links to le pen)
 
As far as I know Peter Tatchell has never had sex with children, he may be putting forward as part of his policies lowering the age of consent, which is something that I disagree with.

It is also something that elements on the left (and far right also) have been pushing: With elements of the GLA supporting PIE (Paedophile information Exchange) thus incorporating SWP and others by default into a similar position in the 1970's to early 1980's, elements around USEC/USFI in the guise of a dodgy group calling itself Campaign Against Fascism In Europe who pushed openly a position of intergenerational sex, various elements and agliaindividuals supporting NAMBLA ( North American Man Boy Love Association), such as Hakim Bey, Cammile Paglia & possibly elements on the libertarian left such as Anarchy: Them Desire Armed.

This influence I am vehementely opposed to. The only thing I would say about Tatchell is that if he justifies what by the default, as he has some bizzare idea that if it is only people within two or three years having sexual relationships if he lowers the age of consent(how he make this work practically is beyond me), then he is partly responsible for the lives of people that he has fucked up.

what a load of smearing shite .. why do you not actually read what the man says instead of trying to smear him with being a paedo??? p.s. the age of consent in holland is 12 .. are they all paedos???

http://www.petertatchell.net/

"This evidence spurred OutRage! to launch a new campaign "to reduce the age of consent to l4 for everyone, both gay and straight", arguing that "l4 is more realistic than 16, and much fairer".

Already, 20 European countries have ages of consent lower than l6. The minimum age is effectively l2 in the Netherlands, Spain, Portugal and Malta. It's 14 in Slovenia, Iceland, Montenegro, Serbia, Italy, San Marino, Albania and, in certain circumstances, Germany. All these laws apply equally to hetero and homo sex.

The introduction of these comparatively low ages of consent has not increased the sexual abuse of young people. They have adequate protection through the laws against rape and indecent assault.

In the Netherlands, freer and franker attitudes towards teenage sex, together with a strong emphasis on the right of young people to control their own bodies, has led to greater sexual wisdom and responsibility. Although Dutch youths are legally allowed to have sex from the age of 12, on average they choose to have their first sexual experience at a slightly later age than their British counterparts. Most significantly, the Dutch rate of pregnancies and abortions in girls under l6 is less than one-seventh of the rate in Britain. This suggests that empowering young people with legal rights and sexual information is the best way to protect them."
 
and quoting that dodgy cnut Ricky Gervais is strengthening your crumbling argument is it ?

I don't think Ricky Gervais is dodgy, possibly to politically correct tossers like yourself, who probably something crypto fascistic in Carry On Films; but then your not that much in touch with society i should'nt imagine.

Good luck with your nonces charter, although I should imagine you'll last about five minutes in certain parts of Oxford East.
 
Back
Top Bottom