Dillinger4
Es gibt Zeit
most of the content is quoting an anarchist, so I agreed.
![]()
No.
The bits you wrote.
most of the content is quoting an anarchist, so I agreed.
![]()
I want to be a hippie and I want to get stoned on Mari-Marijuana...
No.
The bits you wrote.
rest was an anarchistsWhen I asked an anarchist recently,
Quote:
"right so you do accept the political ambitions of SW CC is a classles society, communism/anarchy, yes? You just think their methodology is flawed, yes?"
the reply was.
Sadly?Sadly this is the most popular crossover hit thread (i.e. it's in P&P and people other than the P&P regulars are posting on it) in P&P in recent days/weeks/months/eons.
but you could be bothered to type.I think I kind of understand the question. But i'm finding it very hard to give a shit either way.

Sadly?
It has Bakewell Puddings, Celebrity Big Brother, and bad language from the start. What more do you want?
but you could be bothered to type.
33 responses in 15 minutes, but only 1 anarchist vote.![]()
When I asked an anarchist recently, the reply was.
.
btw nomenklatura = ruling elite
I just wondered how widespread this idea that SWP CC have no ambition to promote a "classless society", rather a society with fewer strata, perhaps merely a nomenklatura and a proleteriat, was.
Reformed ham-like substance, or ham?Ham. (see my link for more details)
"You must care. You posted on the thread..."
ye im interested which anarchists believe "the very fact that the swp cc promote a vanguardist approach reveals them to have no ambition whatsoever to promote the idea of a "classless society", but rather a society with fewer strata, perhaps merely a nomenklatura and a proleteriat

There is no option for "I am an anarchist and I sorta understand the question" or "I am an anarchist and would like further clarification".33 responses in 15 minutes, but only 1 anarchist vote.![]()
I don't understand the thread title or the question. I agree wholeheartedly on the finding it hard to give a shit either way. Or the third way either for that matter.I think I kind of understand the question. But i'm finding it very hard to give a shit either way.
Ye Im interested which anarchists believe "The very fact that the SWP CC promote a vanguardist approach reveals them to have no ambition whatsoever to promote the idea of a "classless society", but rather a society with fewer strata, perhaps merely a nomenklatura and a proleteriat."
Why do you think?![]()
Your words conspiracy theory merchant.The very fact that the SWP CC promote a vanguardist approach reveals them to have no ambition whatsoever to promote the idea of a "classless society", but rather a society with fewer strata, perhaps merely a nomenklatura and a proleteriat.
I am not going to speak on behalf of anybody else, but I personally couldn't give a fucking fuck.

Just now satisfying some people
RMP3 is giving Callinicos head as we speak!agreed.Well, it's looking pretty convincing that most people, anarchist or not, think the SWCC aren't interested in the idea of a classless society, but rather becoming the next ruling elite, having their shoes polished and nails buffed by ex-merchant-bankers in gimp suits.
