They could still try them - just not as planned.angry bob said:MatthewCuffe said:And what is the significance of this verdict in relation to the future closure of Guantanamo and all the rest of the torture and/or death camps?
Probably not good. In as much as the govt really doesnt know what to do with the detainees ... and now they cant try them as planned.
I think many many should simply be let go because there is zero evidence against them (I don't think the british cases are unique) - but that does leave the question of what to do with those who were captured in the act of fighting US forces and who would go back to fighting US forces. The obvious thing to do would be to hold them as POWs, but wouldn't that require the US to declare war on someone and give a reasonable objective for that war so that it could be determined when the war was over and the POWs should be released?




