Suicide Bomber Kills 3 in Israel

[TomUS]

A vote for Nader was a vote against both Republicans and Democrats. It was not in any shape or form a vote for Bush.

I understand what you are trying to say (not supporting the Democrats = indirectly helping the Republicans), but I completely disagree with that outlook. You need to move beyond the two party mind set. You could just as well argue that a vote for the Democrats was a vote for Bush because it prevented Nader getting all the anti-Republican votes.

By god you're absoutely right. Them damn Democrat voters prevented Nader from being our leader! I hates um.

 

[TomUS]

Mmmm, that'd be the covenant they committed themselves to reviewing (strangely enough, Israel stepped up its' harrassment and interdiction efforts shortly therefter), would it?

Did they really commit themselves to reviewing it & possibly changing it? And it's the actions of Israel that somehow prevented them from doing this? I'd really like to see some info on this. This CSM article a year ago says no way will they change it. But I'd like to see some info to the contrary.

As global pressure mounts, the radical Islamist group says it won't alter its charter calling for jihad against Israel.

Now Hamas finds itself caught between an overwhelming mandate to run the Palestinian Authority (PA) after last week's election and an international demand to change its stance on Israel. And the movement's lengthy charter stands as a roadblock between the two.

Changing it, say Hamas leaders, is not on the table. Don't change it - says Israel, the US, the European Union, and the United Nations - and Hamas will not be invited to the table, neither for negotiations nor for foreign aid.

In translation, the document is close to 9,000 words and is replete with Koranic references instructing Muslims to wage jihad (meaning holy war or struggle) against the Jews on every last hilltop of historical Palestine - not just the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, but also Israel proper, as established in 1948.

http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0201/p06s01-wome.html

 

[nino_savatte]

Donc, c'est vrai? Oui!

The charges stick and you have absolutely no defence...except a silly smiley.

I see you're still finding it hard to tell the truth or answer any questions that have been put to you. Odd how you demand that others reply to your points and questions, while you refuse to oblige anyone. What an arsehole. Still, it exposes you for the dishonest dissembler that you are.

 

[GarfieldLeChat]

Garfield: Please do not tell us what the Israeli people think. I have invited you to visit and if you ever take me up you will then have an idea on what SOME Israelis think but we have a saying here: "2 Israelis equal 3 opinions." Take it to heart. In fact, currently, the right has never been in a stronger position.

Provide me with proof that the ISM leadership admitted to doctoring photos of rachel corrie.

Evidence please that Captain "R" sucessfully sued Uvda-and the trial is over.

The producers of Uvda in that same court case admitted their show on Captain "R" was 'pure fantasy'

Three simple questions....since you made the claims you should be able to back them up easily? If not am I to take it you cannot....because it's looking that way.


Publicly retract rachamim-it's all you have left now.
just for refference like

 

[Johnny Canuck3]

Donc, c'est vrai? Oui!

The charges stick and you have absolutely no defence...except a silly smiley.

I see you're still finding it hard to tell the truth or answer any questions that have been put to you. Odd how you demand that others reply to your points and questions, while you refuse to oblige anyone. What an arsehole. Still, it exposes you for the dishonest dissembler that you are.

 

[Lock&Light]

 

[Johnny Canuck3]

 

[GarfieldLeChat]

You really expect me to dredge back through your 13,000+ posts to satisfy your commmand that I produce quotes, and all this after being called a lying shitbag?

Dream on, bubba.

yes you lying shit bag i do for good reason i'm calling you a lying shit bag preciesly because you make such a smear but cannot back it up now you are refusing to do so becuase of hurt feelings awr didums no proof and once again you smear with out cause and prove catigorically that you are a lying shit bag... well done jonny i didn't think it would be that quick of you to admit your own dishonesty...

 

[nino_savatte]

Two smilies instead of one. You're still a dissembler, a hypocrite and a liar. Nothing can alter that.

 

[Johnny Canuck3]

Two smilies instead of one. You're still a dissembler, a hypocrite and a liar. Nothing can alter that.

 

[Johnny Canuck3]

yes you lying shit bag i do for good reason i'm calling you a lying shit bag preciesly because you make such a smear but cannot back it up now you are refusing to do so becuase of hurt feelings awr didums no proof and once again you smear with out cause and prove catigorically that you are a lying shit bag... well done jonny i didn't think it would be that quick of you to admit your own dishonesty...

This is a run-on sentence.

 

[nino_savatte]

You

 

[nino_savatte]

This is a run-on sentence.

This is typewritten diarrhoea.

 

[goldenecitrone]

If I were an Israeli candlestick maker I'd be a bit more careful around my business after this.

 

[moono]

Yeah. What a pity that the butchers survive.

 

[GarfieldLeChat]

This is a run-on sentence.

so again you are wriggling not providing proof of your lies or alligations and still attempting to smeer well done JCTwatter proud of you work... outstanding..

 

[Johnny Canuck3]

You

 

[Johnny Canuck3]

so again you are wriggling not providing proof of your lies or alligations and still attempting to smeer well done JCTwatter proud of you work... outstanding..

I can't. Your saved posts only go back to Jan 15, 2007.

 

[nino_savatte]

Projecting again? It's you who needs help, Bozo.