Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Subterranean Rivers

poster342002 said:
I thought the River Effra went from south London and out into the Thames' south bank? The one I mean exits onto the north bank just next to the northern end of Vauxhall Bridge - which means it must run through north London? :confused:

Sorry, all those references to northbound confused me.

The one on the north bank is the Tyburn stream somtimes known as the River Tyburn.

The mouth of the Effra used to be under what is now the St George's Wharf development, hence that site was referred to as the Effra site during the thirty years that it remained undeveloped. I think that there is still a small outlet somewhere in the river wall.

IIRC The larger outlet with the new nameplate for the river Effra in front of the Security Service (MI5) is actually the more recent Effra storm relief channel.
 
PacificOcean said:
There is nothing at Sloane Square about it. You think for something so interesting right above your head, they might have put up a little plaque or sign or something, but no.

What, something like "Insert explosive device here to flood most of the District Line" :rolleyes:

Actually AFAIK it is only "full" of water about half a dozen time a year after torrential downpours.
 
lang rabbie said:
Sorry, all those references to northbound confused me.

The one on the north bank is the Tyburn stream somtimes known as the River Tyburn.
Thanks for that! I often wondered about it. I think quite a few people mistakenly get this confused with the effra, oddly enough.
 
lang rabbie said:
What, something like "Insert explosive device here to flood most of the District Line" :rolleyes:

They don't need too. The District line floods at the merest hint of drizzle, as I am fully aware being a daily user. :)
 
lang rabbie said:
These are the waters of that sacred stream known as the River Effra

I was only half kidding - this was an ancient place of sacrifice. I've only just realised from Google that Gods of the River and Bridge is included in the magazine section of U75. :o

In 1998 the Thames Archaeological survey found the remains of a huge oak bridge built 3500 years ago not far from the present Vauxhall Bridge. The confluence of three rivers, where the Tyburn enters the Thames from the north and the Effra from the south, and the tidal turning point would have made this a sacred site for Bronze Age tribes.

Around the bridge were votive offerings of valuable goods to appease the spirits of the river. The Celts regarded rivers as bestowers of life, health, and plenty, and offered them rich gifts and sacrifices often at the same spots used by pre-Celtic British tribes.

It's an article to complement Chris Roberts' * new book on London Bridges Cross River Traffic which, counter-intuitively for many people, starts with Vauxhall Bridge as probably the oldest crossing-place.

(*friend of Maggot who "led" a walk of Urbanite rabble around the city bridges this summer)
 
I have a cool book called London under London, by Richard Trench and Ellis Hillman

One of the most popular books on London (it has reprinted six times since it was first published in 1984) London under London has now been updated to take into account the latest subterranean developments. Drawing extensively from the literature and visual archives of the underworld, London under London traces the history of the tunnellers and borers who have pierced the ground beneath the city for close on two thousand years. The authors trace the routes taken by man and nature, and enable us to follow them from the comfort of our armchairs. They can also tell us, gazetteer-style, exactly where we can get below and see the strange world which they depict, whom to ask for permission, and which of the public service authorities organizes trips underground

not just about subterranean rivers but they are in there.
 
PacificOcean said:
They don't need too. The District line floods at the merest hint of drizzle, as I am fully aware being a daily user. :)

When I started work with the Underground one of my first chances to earn overtime came when sewage leaked onto the Circle and District Line. I was aprt of the team that had to get the signals working again - all that wet stuff had fucked up the elecrical circuits.

I didn't go down there until most of it had been cleared, but even then it smelt quite pooey.
 
all this talk of subterranean london - has anyone heard of the moleman of hackney? He's a bloke who has been digging holes under his house in Hackney for decades. I've got a feeling he's been locked up now.
 
Major Tom said:
all this talk of subterranean london - has anyone heard of the moleman of hackney? He's a bloke who has been digging holes under his house in Hackney for decades. I've got a feeling he's been locked up now.

Why? (Why did he dig holes, not why has he been locked up)

and ewww to your District line story. Some stations do have a whiff about them. There always seems to be a slight pong at my local station (Aldgate East)
 
Major Tom said:
When I started work with the Underground one of my first chances to earn overtime came when sewage leaked onto the Circle and District Line. I was aprt of the team that had to get the signals working again - all that wet stuff had fucked up the elecrical circuits.

I didn't go down there until most of it had been cleared, but even then it smelt quite pooey.
disgust.jpg
 
PacificOcean said:
Why? (Why did he dig holes, not why has he been locked up)

i wish i knew - it was only a short piece in the Fortean Times, with absolutely no detail.

and ewww to your District line story. Some stations do have a whiff about them. There always seems to be a slight pong at my local station (Aldgate East)

I think Waterloo is the stinkiest station. The smell comes form dead animals rats, mice, pigeons) rotting in sections of the station that are no longer accessible - so i have been told.
 
Major Tom said:
I think Waterloo is the stinkiest station. The smell comes form dead animals rats, mice, pigeons) rotting in sections of the station that are no longer accessible - so i have been told.

How would a pigeon get to the lowest reaches of the Bakerloo line platorms - which is where the smell seems to be at its worst :eek:
 
lang rabbie said:
How would a pigeon get to the lowest reaches of the Bakerloo line platorms - which is where the smell seems to be at its worst :eek:

I should have put a question mark after pigeon. I'd guess that they can get down there. However, like you I doubt that there'd be many. But definitely rats and mice I would have thought. And their poo.
 
lang rabbie said:
previous London's Underground Rivers thread

Lost Rivers of London by Nicholas Barton is the standard book - should still be a copy at most London public libraries

It's a fine book, but it only devotes one chapter to the lost rivers of south London. These are, apparently, "less interesting, less historically important and much less well documented than those of the north" because of the "marshy conditions which for long prevailed over much of the area".

There are still 9 pages on the Effra, the Falcon Brook, the Earl's Sluice and the Neckinger - and a nice pull out map at the back - but probably not worth the £17 investment.

You can get a good idea of the map from here for free anyway: http://www.platformlondon.org/images/rivermap.pdf
 
lang rabbie said:
What, something like "Insert explosive device here to flood most of the District Line" :rolleyes:

This happened during WWII, a bomb hit the station and ruptured the aquaduct and flooded the station and/or line. I think nearly 200 people were killed.....!?!
 
BrixiSteve said:
lang rabbie said:
What, something like "Insert explosive device here to flood most of the District Line" :rolleyes:

This happened during WWII, a bomb hit the station and ruptured the aquaduct and flooded the station and/or line. I think nearly 200 people were killed.....!?!

:confused: I thought although that bomb destoyed the station at ground level, it didn't actually lead to mass fatalities.

The Underground at War said:
"Sloane Square" [Circle/District, sub-surface]
Direct hit 10pm 12/11/40 demolished a previous reconstruction only completed 27/03/40. Large concrete fragment landed on roof of one car of departing train, injuring 79. Rebuilt post-War. {R15/R06}
http://www.625.org.uk/tuawtemp/tuaw.htm
 
Major Tom said:
all this talk of subterranean london - has anyone heard of the moleman of hackney? He's a bloke who has been digging holes under his house in Hackney for decades. I've got a feeling he's been locked up now.

I heard about this in local paper. Here's a link I just found. It is an amazing looking building also featured on derelict London website.

http://tunneling.irational.org/united_kingdom/london/hackney_moleman/

But the nuttiest tunnel builder has to be the Mole of Edge Hill in Liverpool. No-one know why he did it.

http://www.williamsontunnels.com/
 
subterranean rivers - north london

Have been looking at the south london subterranean rivers thread and am wondering if anyone knows about subterranean rivers north of the Thames? Particularly in the Islington area, including the New River in canonbury.
 
Urban has had walks along the length of at least the Effa and Fleet in the past 2-3 years - I researched the Fleet one - and quite a lot of that info is searchable here.

There is also plenty online. Here are the rivers:
http://strangemaps.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/lost_rivers.jpg

Sorry, I know this isn't south London but I was facinated to find (as I use the station everyday) that the huge pipe running over the platforms at Sloane Square station is a underground tributary of the Thames (can't remember what it's called though) which they had to route through the pipe when building the station as it's a "cut and cover" build.

There is nothing at Sloane Square about it. You think for something so interesting right above your head, they might have put up a little plaque or sign or something, but no.
It's the River Westbourne - passing overhead:

1000476_7c28b813.jpg
 
Andrew Duncan's book "Secret London" has a selection of walks that follow the hidden rivers through central London.
 
These things are placed in various parts of South London, and as far as I can tell seem to mark the passage of a subterranean river. Any idea what function they serve?

This one here is right above the Quaggy just up the road from Lewisham town centre.

DSCF1763.jpg

They are called Stink pipes and were used to diffuse the smells and gases from the rivers in the days when they were much dirtier than they are now.
 
There's some kind of small stream running through Peckham Rye Park. I used to play around it with a mate when I was a kid. I remember having to squeeze through a gap in the wall of the children's playground to get to it.
 
There's some kind of small stream running through Peckham Rye Park. I used to play around it with a mate when I was a kid. I remember having to squeeze through a gap in the wall of the children's playground to get to it.

http://www.foprp.org.uk/#/early-history/4543697136

"Rye comes from the Old English 'brook' and would have been named after the little river Peck that once flowed across the Rye. Part of this stream can still be seen on the West side of Peckham Rye Park today."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/River_Peck

"River Peck is a small stream in London that was enclosed in 1823. Today, parts of this stream can still be seen on the west side of Peckham Rye Park.

The mouth of the stream was at Deptford, where it was widened to form South Dock."
 
http://www.foprp.org.uk/#/early-history/4543697136

"Rye comes from the Old English 'brook' and would have been named after the little river Peck that once flowed across the Rye. Part of this stream can still be seen on the West side of Peckham Rye Park today."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/River_Peck

"River Peck is a small stream in London that was enclosed in 1823. Today, parts of this stream can still be seen on the west side of Peckham Rye Park.

The mouth of the stream was at Deptford, where it was widened to form South Dock."
That's fascinating. Cheers! :cool:
 
Have been looking at the south london subterranean rivers thread and am wondering if anyone knows about subterranean rivers north of the Thames? Particularly in the Islington area, including the New River in canonbury.

The "New River" is neither subterranean nor an actual river!

It was dug as a water supply channel from the Lea Valley near Ware to Clerkenwell (New River Head is just behind Sadlers Wells) back in the days of King James VI & I in the early C17th.

The part south of Stoke Newington became just decorarative sometime in the late nineteenth century when it was mostly filled in leaving just the shallow fake stream you can see nowadays.
 
The "New River" is neither subterranean nor an actual river!

It was dug as a water supply channel from the Lea Valley near Ware to Clerkenwell (New River Head is just behind Sadlers Wells) back in the days of King James VI & I in the early C17th.

The part south of Stoke Newington became just decorarative sometime in the late nineteenth century when it was mostly filled in leaving just the shallow fake stream you can see nowadays.

That's very interesting. I live near the New River and always thought it was a bit of a joke to call it a river as it's so narrow.
I also used to wonder where it went as it seems to just stop and I thought maybe it went into the Lea at some point, though couldn't see where.
The mystery is now solved!
 
Back
Top Bottom