Not really, but how about this shot!alef said:Would someone like to post a shot?
wordie said:Not really, but how about this shot!
It really needs to be on a black background and be centered. Oh, and you may have to increase it's size - as when I view it in FireFox it's not at it's full size! But then that's not a criticism of the shot is it?
I won't take any criticism personally. Maybe .
I'll assume that's complimentary then Alef! Hadn't seen the robot/transformer/ESB connection and I would have preferred to have some clouds in the back. As it was it was just a grey day.alef said:Very strong shot, anthropomorphises (animal-pomorphises!?) the bridge. Reminds me of those walker-robot things in snow from the Empire Strikes Back! Lack of clouds is good, can't find fault, though agree a non-white background would be better. Flipping the photo left to right might be worth considering?
alef said:I'll submit this one because I'm not very sure about it. Was trying to do something similar to yours, wordie, but just don't think these pipes and bit of wall are interesting enough.
jeff_leigh said:ok i'm game for it here's my pic
Cadmus said:seems it's all about rivers, bridges...ha, well....Enter the Thames
[SIZE=-2](im crap at photography, i just do it for self amusement)[/SIZE]
I'm liking all of them but "clapham on a sunny day" is my favorite. The colours work well and compsition is lovely.alef said:Like it a lot. Though would definitely be better in b+w because it's strength is the shapes, textures and compositions, but the brown water is distracting. Perhaps needs a bit of contrast adjustment too. Look out for a competition theme on "sinking"!
(Entries coming in thick and fast now -- at least for such a usually slow forum -- need more critics please)
Agree with Alef. Great composition and intrigueing subject. Would be better in B&W I reckon.Cadmus said:seems it's all about rivers, bridges...ha, well....Enter the Thames
[SIZE=-2](im crap at photography, i just do it for self amusement)[/SIZE]
I think you've confused yourself here Alef. You liked the angles of the top of the building as well as the blue sky and lamppost didn't you?. Problem is you quite liked the pattern of the pipes as well. Without knowing your circumstances - like how much freedom of movement you had, equipment restrictions etc, - I think you've got too much in the picture.alef said:I'll submit this one because I'm not very sure about it. Was trying to do something similar to yours, wordie, but just don't think these pipes and bit of wall are interesting enough.
beekeeper said:I'm liking all of them but "clapham on a sunny day" is my favorite. The colours work well and compsition is lovely.
I'd like to submit but don't have my own webspace. Can I just attach a file to a post instead?
Again, as with my critique of Alef's shot, I haven't a clue about how much freedom of movement you had or what your equipment was but if you'd moved a little to your left and panned the camera a smidgen to the right, you would have made the "Z" in the picture more obvious and lost the vegitation at the end of the bridge on the right, making the whole shot more graphic.jeff_leigh said:ok i'm game for it here's my pic
wordie said:I think you've confused yourself here Alef. You liked the angles of the top of the building as well as the blue sky and lamppost didn't you?. Problem is you quite liked the pattern of the pipes as well. Without knowing your circumstances - like how much freedom of movement you had, equipment restrictions etc, - I think you've got too much in the piture.
I reckon you'd have done better getting closer to the pipes and cropped out the rest, making an interesting pattern come alive against the bricks. OR Tried to isolate the slightly strange angles of the roofline against the blue sky, leaving the pipes out of it altogether.
But then, what do I know?
Alef, if you're going for a walk, and you've got the chance to take something more than a compact digicam, see what you can do with a longer lens on both pipes and roof angles. See if you can't get a little higher on the pipes as well... Just a thought! (And hopefully you'll start another thread with the results of your trip....! )alef said:I think you know a lot Agree with your analysis: too much at once. "Keeping it simple" really is such a good rule of thumb. Might go back and try some more shots with that of wall of pipes since it's only a short walk from here...
Filesize is limited to 9.8k... Now I know why it's not such a good idea. I fiddled around with photoshop but can't get a decent enough pic that small! - I'll try and find some webspace.alef said:Cheers, bee
I think people avoid attachments to help keep down the server costs, but if it were a real problem surely editor & co would have disabled it? Go for it.
wordie said:If you'd gone to the path on the bridge, there may have been some very graphic things going on with all those diagonal metal struts.
Of course it's only a subjective view and you might not have thought there was anything else in it. Not a problem. Nice bridge!
Corax said:I'm very amateur. Point'n'click, me. I was pleased with this though.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v320/Corax_U75/U75/Line.jpg
jeff, rather than trying to get the whole structure, try getting closer to the metalwork and look for patterns in there if you can. Often some very graphic shapes and shadows to be found.jeff_leigh said:i took a couple of pics from the path on the bridge but the problem was the lighting, i'm gonna go back sometime and try and climb the fence to get a pic of the bridge from the rail track
something like this
I agree with your comments Alef. The washing would have looked better if it was isolated in silhouette against the evening sky.... OR the buildings would have made a good frame for the colours in the sky.alef said:Don't underestimate what can be done with a simple compact!
Your picture captures a very relaxing mood. Although I haven't taken many, I like silhouettes of buildings with sunsets. Here, though, think you've got too much going on. The clothes line would work better either as a side detail or the central subject, here it's half and half. The aerial/lighting rod was probably impossible to avoid from where you were, but unfortunately I think it really distracts. The edges of the buildings frame the sides of the picture nicely.
beekeeper said:right - I hope this works:
http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/postercontact/detail?.dir=9605&.dnm=a96d.jpg&.src=ph
it's in Geneva, SwitzerlandMrs Magpie said:It does...where is it?