Stonehenge created in 1900?

[quimcunx]

Turner's ''sunrise at stonehenge''.

Looks fake to me.

 

[xes]

The engraving explained that the moon is made of cheese.

now that I would believe!!

 

[danny la rouge]

Turner's ''sunrise at stonehenge''.

Looks fake to me.

Stone 'enge!

 

[moon]

The pictures in that film clearly show that the stones are just lying on the ground
Also there are articles to prove it was made
http://www.ufos-aliens.co.uk/cosmicstonehenge.htm
http://beehive.thisissomerset.co.uk/default.asp?WCI=SiteHome&ID=8259&PageID=51317

 

[belboid]

The pictures in that film clearly show that the stones are just lying on the ground
Also there are articles to prove it was made
http://www.ufos-aliens.co.uk/cosmicstonehenge.htm
http://beehive.thisissomerset.co.uk/default.asp?WCI=SiteHome&ID=8259&PageID=51317

god, you really are fucking thick arent you? have you actually read the replies, amidst laughing at your stupidity they do point out the fact that the stones were reset. Tghat is not a secret, and only thick fuckwits and conspiraloons think otherwise

 

[JimW]

Fucking hell belboid - there's an article at ufos-aliens.co.uk - what more proof do you want?

 

[FreddyB]

god, you really are fucking thick arent you? have you actually read the replies, amidst laughing at your stupidity they do point out the fact that the stones were reset. Tghat is not a secret, and only thick fuckwits and conspiraloons think otherwise

Fucking brainwashed

 

[danny la rouge]

Fucking hell belboid - there's an article at ufos-aliens.co.uk - what more proof do you want?

 

[DotCommunist]

Fucking hell belboid - there's an article at ufos-aliens.co.uk - what more proof do you want?

There's no telling some sheeple

 

[belboid]

Fucking hell belboid - there's an article at ufos-aliens.co.uk - what more proof do you want?

co.uk??!! co dot bleeding uk?????

If they were a serious group they'd have a co.universe address!

 

[moon]

note to self.
Must remember not to question anything..repeat X100

 

[Signal 11]

The pictures in that film clearly show that the stones are just lying on the ground
Also there are articles to prove it was made
http://www.ufos-aliens.co.uk/cosmicstonehenge.htm
http://beehive.thisissomerset.co.uk/default.asp?WCI=SiteHome&ID=8259&PageID=51317

Both those articles say that Stonehenge is 4000 years old.

 

[quimcunx]

note to self.
Must remember not to question anything..repeat X100

No! No! No! You must question things.




Start with questioning these two:

http://www.ufos-aliens.co.uk/cosmicstonehenge.htm
http://beehive.thisissomerset.co.uk/default.asp?WCI=SiteHome&ID=8259&PageID=51317

 

[FreddyB]

Both those articles say that Stonehenge is 4000 years old.

You're seeing what you want to see. So sad

 

[belboid]

note to self.
Must remember not to question anything..repeat X100

note to moon:

do some basic bleeding research before believing any old guff you read on a website

 

[Blagsta]

note to self.
Must remember not to question anything..repeat X100

Question things, but use your brain too!

 

[JimW]

For centuries we have known only two medieval depictions of Stonehenge. Now a third has been found...Medieval representations of Stonehenge are extremely rare. For generations we have known of only two, dateable to the earlier 14th century. Further views do not appear until the second half of the 16th century, after a complete break in both the spirit and form of imagery. I can now describe, for the first time to the English-speaking world, a newlydiscovered medieval drawing of Stonehenge created in the 1440s.

http://www.britarch.ac.uk/ba/ba92/feat1.shtml
Not aliens-r-us, I admit, but might be worth your inquiring perusal, tho did just edit to go direct to the source, some so-called "archaeologists"

 

[two sheds]

Unless the real stones were moved, and falsies put in place of them. But I'm struggling to think of a reason why. Unless they were engraved with something telling, like esoteric knowlage or something else that "they" don't want us to know about.

Well known fact that they didn't have the technology in the 1900s to move stones that size.

 

[belboid]

Question things, but use your brain too!

especially question whatever sounds like absolute bollocks, and is sourced from a website mainly concerned with 'aliens'

 

[moon]

If the footage shows stonehenge as a pile of rocks lying on the ground...why should I beleive that their current configuration is ancient? As per all the guide books?

 

[Blagsta]

If the footage shows stonehenge as a pile of rocks lying on the ground...why should I beleive that their current configuration is ancient? As per all the guide books?

You're not using your brain.

 

[danny la rouge]

note to self.
Must remember not to question anything..repeat X100

You, moon, need this.

hth

 

[FreddyB]

If the footage shows stonehenge as a pile of rocks lying on the ground...why should I beleive that their current configuration is ancient? As per all the guide books?

You shouldn't, it's clearly not ancient and is yet another example of public money being used by the corporate machine. Tussauds will take it over now it's built.

It's like PFI tourism

 

[xes]

If the footage shows stonehenge as a pile of rocks lying on the ground...why should I beleive that their current configuration is ancient? As per all the guide books?

because you've been told to (remember, never question authority, the urbans don't likes it)

And you are using your brain, by looking for an alternative answer, other than one you've been told is right. Ones that don't use their brains just believe hook line and sinker, what they've been told by some bloke who looks clever cos he's got a scientist coat on.

 

[JimW]

Or you could review the extensive archaeological work done on the site that shows the pits where the stones were placed, including ones now missing. Like some kind of sheeple dupe.

 

[DotCommunist]

while 19th century archeologists did get somewhat 'creative' on occaisonal restorations (see some of the greek/turkish excavations and restorations), the evidence doesn't support such for stonehenge.

 

[moon]

while 19th century archeologists did get somewhat 'creative' on occaisonal restorations (see some of the greek/turkish excavations and restorations), the evidence doesn't support such for stonehenge.

What evidence?

 

[butchersapron]

What evidence?

What evidence that stonehenge existed prior to 1900? Is that what you're asking?


(I'm not falling for this btw, but onwrds...)

 

[two sheds]

god, you really are fucking thick arent you? have you actually read the replies, amidst laughing at your stupidity they do point out the fact that the stones were reset. Tghat is not a secret, and only thick fuckwits and conspiraloons think otherwise

Bit fucking unnecessary wasn't it?

 

[DotCommunist]

What evidence?

do your own research. I saw a history channel documentary on stonehenge (and seahenge) ages ago, and have read several articles on it. of course, I'm willing to be proved wrong, but the chances of it being entirely a 19th century forgery strike me as miniscule.
(read your links before you post them and people won't mock so much)