In 2010, all three councillors are up for re-election, and it's no surprise that many labour voters will vote for two labour councillors and the leading green candidate. That's how greens got elected in a number of London wards in 2006. The practical effect of having 3 votes at once is a very, very limited form of proportionality creeping in.
I think Hackney greens will be disappointed not to win the byelection, but we've strengthened our case in 15 months time. You can bet there will be a few more Lib Dems in the ward who perhaps feel a bit let down or misled, who will also be voting green next time.
As expected the Greens did well in Stoke Newington. But if you look at recent election results in North and East London you will see how badly the Greens have been doing in comparison with their previous results:
29 January Valentines ward, Redbridge
In previous by election the Greens got 9.8%. This time they didnt field a candidate
15 January Seven Sisters ward, Haringey - 7.1%
8 January Bush Hill Park, Enfield - 5.5.%
4 December. Hale End & Highams Park, Waltham Forest -4.7%
As for the Greens in Stoke Newington Central my guess is that if they couldent win this time with activists drawn in from elsewhere they wont win in 2010
BarryB
eek:!), but at least we've never allied ourselves with a party of war-mongers and gentrifiers. Nusret Sen's Tankie ideas are bizarre, but in practical terms relatively harmless compared with the stalinist-like dominance of Hackney Labour Party which, when not force-feeding residents with the pravda-like Hackney Toady, sets up false consultations and rides rough-shod over tenants wishes, closes down debate about local issues by refusing access to its venues to anyone potentially off-message and is trying to change the rules to allow Mayor Pipe (a promoter of his own cult of personality) to stand for a third term.