Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Starship troopers - any good?

Johnny Canuck2 said:
Funny, I would have considered it to be more anti-war, than fascistic.
Starship Troopers, the book, anti-war?

Okay, you're going to have to go into more detail on that one, because I cannot see that at all.
 
The film is great nazis in outer space wonderful fun .The 2nd one is terrible until the end .cartoon is good as well .
The book was written as a homage to the united states marine corps
as Heinlein was in the united states navy on the troop ships which the marines left to invade various pacfic islands .The idea that we would have better leaders if the right to lead or vote had to be earned and earned by military or some other civilian equivilent service is intresting .The book is certainly worth
reading .
 
FridgeMagnet said:
Starship Troopers, the book, anti-war?

Okay, you're going to have to go into more detail on that one, because I cannot see that at all.

Maybe it was just me at the time I read it. It seemed to paint war almost as tedious drudgery.
 
FridgeMagnet said:
Not that the political climate is any excuse. There were other people writing challenging, intelligent SF at the same time.

What I can't understand is that some people don't get that Heinlein was taking the piss out of right wingers/military dweebs/authoritarians etc. rather than endorsing them.
 
Loki said:
What I can't understand is that some people don't get that Heinlein was taking the piss out of right wingers/military dweebs/authoritarians etc. rather than endorsing them.
He must have been far too subtle; I'm afraid the book reads completely straight to me.
 
Stigmata said:
Read The Forever War by Joe Haldeman. It's a similar idea but better executed.

and, to some extent at least written as a response/critque to Starship Troopers (Haldeman having been in Vietnam)
 
FridgeMagnet said:
He must have been far too subtle; I'm afraid the book reads completely straight to me.
I've never been able to make my mind up for sure, I used to think it was completely straight until I saw the movie, in which several of the funniest scenes were lifted straight from the book: e.g. their high-school teacher's rant about military/civic virtue or the scenes with the psycho drill instructor. Did Heinlein intend those as satire? If you just saw the film you'd be in no doubt those scenes were satirical and as far as I can recall they were a straight lift. On the other hand, maybe a po-faced origin in Heinlein's serious intent is exactly why they became such spot-on satire in the movie?
 
Bernie Gunther said:
I've never been able to make my mind up for sure, I used to think it was completely straight until I saw the movie, in which several of the funniest scenes were lifted straight from the book: e.g. their high-school teacher's rant about military/civic virtue or the scenes with the psycho drill instructor. Did Heinlein intend those as satire? If you just saw the film you'd be in no doubt those scenes were satirical and as far as I can recall they were a straight lift. On the other hand, maybe a po-faced origin in Heinlein's serious intent is exactly why they became such spot-on satire in the movie?

I think that might be more to Verhoevens take on the source material (a throwback to his Robocop days).
 
In Bloom said:
This one of those books I keep meaning to read and never get round to, so is it worth bothering with then?

The book is fantastic, much better then the film, but the film is good as well but for totally different reasons.

Heinlin definately endorses stratocracy (government by military) I wouldn't say his world view is fascist, it's certainly militarist, perhaps facistic or pseudo-fascist, but I respect the opinions of those that say he is a straight out fascist. Afterall, military organizations are all inhereantly fascist by definition so... it's all cigerette papers really.

I enjoyed the book Starship Troopers but I don't agree with Heinlins world view (and I remember that alot of the book seemed to go on in a kind of rant-against aspects of the US military and American society in general). I can't stand Heinlin usually, particularly the way he writes about women makes me feel like I'v been locked in a room with an out an out shit-painting lunatic who thinks women are literally from another planet, I can't take most of his stuff seriously, A Stranger in a Strange Land for instance semed promising, before it was ruined for me by his unwieldy and painful chauvanism (I got as far as page 20 I think).

The book was a good way of entering the American military mind of the 40's and 50's anyway (or whenever it was originally written) and how they saw the rest of the world like the people of Korea and the 'communist threat' for example. But I was also impressed by the technology Heinlin imagined, which I thought was quite sophisticated for its time.

57th Mobile Infantry, HOO-AHH!
 
Bernie Gunther said:
I've never been able to make my mind up for sure, I used to think it was completely straight until I saw the movie, in which several of the funniest scenes were lifted straight from the book: e.g. their high-school teacher's rant about military/civic virtue or the scenes with the psycho drill instructor. Did Heinlein intend those as satire? If you just saw the film you'd be in no doubt those scenes were satirical and as far as I can recall they were a straight lift. On the other hand, maybe a po-faced origin in Heinlein's serious intent is exactly why they became such spot-on satire in the movie?

Always saw the original book as satire... Too scary if its taken seriously.
 
heinlein was a bit of a funny one, basically an objectavist (randite), so i'd be inclined to think the book is a parody of fascist statism - but his support for the vietnam war (mentioned in the other thread) would sugest otherwise...

heinlein was definately strongly opposed to racism, and did (accurately) predict fascism without racism in at least one of his books
he also was not consistantly sexist - one of his books had a black female protagonist if i remember rightly
 
The line that made me 'chuckle' was when the guy was offered to be promoted and he said something like,

"No thanks Ive been there once and blown it, i'm just here to fight."

Kind of summed up the stupidity of war in a very throw away remark.
 
rednblack said:
heinlein was a bit of a funny one, basically an objectavist (randite), so i'd be inclined to think the book is a parody of fascist statism - but his support for the vietnam war (mentioned in the other thread) would sugest otherwise...

heinlein was definately strongly opposed to racism, and did (accurately) predict fascism without racism in at least one of his books
he also was not consistantly sexist - one of his books had a black female protagonist if i remember rightly

Hmmm, read most of Heinlein's stuff, and if it's satire then it's buried pretty deep.. try getting hold of a copy of "Farnham's Freehold", a deeply unpleasant book (altho a good read....) and then have another stab at "who is Heinlein?"
 
Psychonaut said:
The revolutionary cell-structure hierarchies in Heinlein's 'the moon is a harsh mistress' almost resulted in 60's karma-terrorists 'brotherhood of eternal love' spiking the US resevoirs with LSD.

I really like that book, aside from it's cringe-inducing bits (spandex!?!?!) it's a good read :cool:
 
be intresting to think who of our current leaders would get into power if heinleins
system was in place.
certainly not Blair or Bush :D.
you did'nt have to fight under the system but whatever you did have to do under fedral service would be difficult dangerous or just unplesantly harsh how many of the westminster mob would deal with 5 years of VOS service for example to get a vote :mad:
who said facism was entirely bad :mad:
 
Jografer said:
Hmmm, read most of Heinlein's stuff, and if it's satire then it's buried pretty deep.. try getting hold of a copy of "Farnham's Freehold", a deeply unpleasant book (altho a good read....) and then have another stab at "who is Heinlein?"

i'll be honest i havent read any of his stuff in about 11-12 years
 
Loki said:
What I can't understand is that some people don't get that Heinlein was taking the piss out of right wingers/military dweebs/authoritarians etc. rather than endorsing them.
That's what I've been thinking. There's a whole load of hienlein stuff that is anti-authoritarian. Like the moon is a harsh mistress, which admittedly I haven't read since the age of about 14. I haven't read starship troopers, but I can't imagine how that film could have been made out of a book endorsing space nazis. It's a distopia if ever there was one.
 
Loki said:
What I can't understand is that some people don't get that Heinlein was taking the piss out of right wingers/military dweebs/authoritarians etc. rather than endorsing them.

...if you like his books then this is an understandable bit of self-delusion.... just not true though..... sorry
 
Back
Top Bottom