Pity. At least they didn't enforce a party line, though.lewislewis said:Unfortunately it was not a resolution, although I was under the impression it was as were many others.
It could be turned into a resolution though, Jill obviously knows more than me about the climate in the party because I'm certain the NC would back an anti-St.Athan resolution.
The NC decided not to take any stance on the issue. Lame. However Jill and anyone else are free to campaign against the academy and not be 'stopped' as John Smith MP suggests.
I guess it would've been too damaging for the membership to have voted against the leadership on an issue like this, especially given the shitstorm of over the top right wing abuse that Jill had to endure from all quarters over the weekend.
