sheffieldboy said:what you do tend to find in life is that groups who espouse violence against external opponents like say the IRA and the Ulster loyalists were also liable to use violence to settle matters internally. Violence becomes a legitimate modus operandi. And that's really the crowning argument against militant anti-fascism.
Also no surprise whatever that one of the authors of the no retreat book giving all those lurid accounts stamping on skinhead's heads, was found guilty of mugging a gay man.
...and forced to resign from Red Action and AFA as a result. Which destroys your uttely incoherent 'crowning argument' on two levels - fistly a) violence was not used to "to settle matters internally" and b) the members of AFA did not 'grow over' into the same sort of politics as the fascists through confronting them, they still retained their political rejection of fascism and acted accordingly whenever those principlese were put to the test.
I'd be interested to hear just why the possibility of internal violence is your 'crowning argument' btw? Presumably if any fascist group directed it's violent activties externally they would be looked on more favourbaly by you up on your cloud than any non-fascist group that had ever experienced any degree of internal violence?

Tosser.
]