ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
what are the causes of chav scum, pk? from whence are they spawned?
They were traumatised at an early age by witnessing an arson attack on their local boozer, innit?

what are the causes of chav scum, pk? from whence are they spawned?

), and I seem to recall a thread around 2002 here where it happened to a female PC in Brixton. Typical Croydon chav scum at their best.
If 30 people put the boot in then how come only two were charged?
Shame it wasn't a fight with these guys...
![]()
Chav scum.
They appeared overnight in winter 1996 wearing Kappa tracksuits.
I have no idea what causes them to breed, however. Stella Artois would be my guess.
Let's face it, the gene pool could use a little chlorine. Especially in Croydon.
The police are always arsey, it's their job. And most of them are arseholes anyway.
But this stupid chav kid thought she'd be clever and what would have been a simple matter turns into a "o no dont diss mi!" screaming and petulant foot-stamping exercise and 30 similarly inbred fuckwits pile in thinking she was getting attacked.
Welcome to Croydon.
But in the same sense - anyone who has lived in Croydon ought to know what fucking trash the chavs who live there can be.
And don't start on that whole underclass crap - it's not a class issue, no matter what the fuckwit Fabians say.
The chav scum have a completely different moral code to regular people, chav lads wouldn't think twice about punching a girl in the face, for example.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7509968.stm
JHE, since you are so interested in language- why repeat the use of the word 'gang'?
What images do you think 'gang' projects?
Probably a combination of (a) exaggeration (there weren't actually 30 directly involved at all); (b) minimal involvement (of those actually taking a direct role, some/many would have been guilty of no more than a bit of low-level pushing, shoving and shouting) and (c) a lack of evidence immediately available / officers immediately available to make multiple arrests (as I suspect the majority would leg it as soon as assistance turned up).If 30 people put the boot in then how come only two were charged?
Maybe ... but there is absolutely no reason that there would have to be. Any sort of challenge, no matter that there is not actually any penalty intended to it, is perceived as "disrespect" by large swathes of the population now. They will kick off over anything (see the post about the bus - you must have seen that loads of times), you see it on Police, Camera, Action type programmes all the time....or if there is more to it than that.
No, they aren't. No, it isn't. And no, they're not.The police are always arsey, it's their job. And most of them are arseholes anyway.
No, they aren't. No, it isn't. And no, they're not.
There are certainly some who fail to recognise their responsibility to break the aggression cycle, no matter how provoked they are ... but there is absolutely no reason to suspect that that must have happened here as the response happens regardess of the attitude of the officers.
Just as well he moved to Dorset, to be honest. Clearly he was provoking these responses by the way he dealt with them, poor lickle victimised darlings. We're better off without him. God help Dorset ...Yup thats the sort of shit my dad had to put up with on a daily basis, being spat at and all sorts, thank fuck he moved to Dorset![]()
Tell me about it ... I was at the centre of it a number of times when I was trying to arrest the fucking drug dealers the "community" kept moaning that we didn't arrest enough of ...It used to be quite common to see 'insta-mobs' popping up around Brixton whenever a street arrest was going down.

Maybe you need to look in the mirror ...As for the dickhead:nice person ratio, I'd put it at about 7 in 10. Feel sorry for the remaining 3 in 10 who are decent people, but that's how it is.
I read this thread in the hope that someone who was there would post.
I'm currently picturing either lots of people laid into some cops on a very flimsy pretext, or the cops did something really provocative which the media are keeping quiet about.
emerging news seems to be that the 2 coppers in question used CS gas and batons BEFORE it kicked off
Its PK innit! Force of nature. law unto himself etc etc ...My only use of the word 'gang' is in the quotation from The Times. It is perfectly obvious that the word refers to the group who attacked the police. (I don't think there is any suggestion that the 30 people usually form any sort of pre-existing organised gang.)
Personally, I call them 'yobs' or 'thugs', but there's nothing wrong with calling them various other things. I've nothing against the use of the word 'gang' here - nor anything against the use of 'mob' in the thread title. Have you?
What do you think of PK's attribution of the thuggery to 'chavs'?

I may be wrong about that. that would probably be during the kickoff
that would probably be during the kickoff
Do you think appeasing violent morons is the way forward then?Would your telling someone off for dropping their litter change them into a better person?
I don't think so.
Is it your job to turn them into a better person?
Whose job is it?
Do you think appeasing violent morons is the way forward then?
Actually I didnt read it as him dissembling or attempting to mislead-
... I saw it as his word for young scrotes in general- with no intention of indicating race or colour in this specific instance.
I'd like to read his response - but, anyway, do you - or does anyone here - think 'chav' is not racially-coded?
Do you think appeasing violent morons is the way forward then?