Sony World Photography Awards 2018

Discussion in 'photography, graphics & art' started by blossie33, Mar 21, 2018.

  1. blossie33

    blossie33 trailer trash

  2. FridgeMagnet

    FridgeMagnet Administrator

    Maybe I'm jaded but I wasn't exactly blown away by any of those. The first and the third you posted here are nice.
     
    editor likes this.
  3. blossie33

    blossie33 trailer trash

    Yes, I do see what you mean.
    There are usually some great photos in the competition though, I will probably go along to Somerset House to have a look when the exhibitions on - 20th April - 6th May.
     
  4. FridgeMagnet

    FridgeMagnet Administrator

    I went along this morning. There are better photos than the winners - I was a bit baffled as to why they picked the ones they did sometimes, but as long as you can see them all I’m okay.

    There are a shedload of photos there in all sorts of categories, and also from people in lots of different countries which is refreshing. My only real complaints were

    * it’s fairly pricey to get in, though you save by going during the day and booking online
    * many of the pics are part of series which aren’t all up, probably due to there just not being enough room. There are a few screens around that seem to cycle through the rest of them but I have zero patience for that and screens never look as good as prints anyway. Probably the exhibition book would be the best way to see everything.
    * Somerset House still has terrible lighting! I don’t understand why, it’s been like that for years. It’s not like these are ancient delicate prints. Just get some new bulbs already.
     
    editor and blossie33 like this.
  5. blossie33

    blossie33 trailer trash

    I went on the first weekend it was open as I got a discounted ticket, went on the Sunday at 10 am when it opened so it wasn't busy and you had chance to read the bits that went with the photos.

    I do agree with the 'normal' price of tickets being expensive.
    Also that there were other photos I preferred to the chosen winners, I think that's always a matter of taste anyway and you never know what the judges are looking for do you?

    I did enjoy seeing the exhibition again this year though. :)
     
  6. editor

    editor Taffus Maximus

    I'd be happy to have snapped 1 and 3, but I'm not a fan of posed 'wacky' pictures like the second one.
     
  7. Sweet FA

    Sweet FA ✪ Three rounds Lord, in my .44 ✪

    I feel sort of cheated when I find out the picture's not 'real'. Like the 1st photo has had a cabin removed and the swimming one below is a composite. Colour/contrast or whatever, I'm not so bothered about.

    [​IMG]
     
    grosun likes this.
  8. editor

    editor Taffus Maximus

    That is a swizzle. Do Not Like. They may as well gone for gold and added a stuffed anteater.
     
    Sweet FA likes this.
  9. FridgeMagnet

    FridgeMagnet Administrator

    I dunno, I liked that one; it pulls together a set of images into a whole that you know is not real but represents reality. I also liked the Andreas Gorsky at the Hayward gallery last weekend and that sort of composite is very much in his style (even the photographer says so explicitly in the blurb).

    There was a whole “Enhanced” section btw which is unusual though the results did vary. I was encouraged by the clear variety of cameras and techniques on show, rather than some prizes where basically everyone uses one of two bodies from one of three manufacturers, and one of two lenses for that mount. The winner of “photographer of the year” - 1st Place, "Ex-voto" by Alys Tomlinson | World Photography Organisation - shot on 4x5 film.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice