What a cheery fellow you are...! One would think if LU where to finally implement driverless trains they'd have advanced the technology a bit... Dunno why this is "hollow politics". Do people really want to be driving trains in dark tunnels under London if the technology can be made available...![]()
it's off now anyway.

Oh well, when you're lying in a tube train wreckage; sloshing around in your own faecal matter and piss while your life's blood draining away; maybe, only maybe, you’ll wonder if this could have been avoided if the train was equiped with a driver.
I hope as those final seconds hurtle towards you; and, your life begins its final phase of insignificance; I hope your last thoughts sum up the utter uselessness of your existence, and the hollowness of your politics.
x 1,000,000cos it's their job?? Would you like to be made unemployed by a robot?
Oh well, when you're lying in a tube train wreckage; sloshing around in your own faecal matter and piss while your life's blood draining away; maybe, only maybe, you’ll wonder if this could have been avoided if the train was equiped with a driver.
I hope as those final seconds hurtle towards you; and, your life begins its final phase of insignificance; I hope your last thoughts sum up the utter uselessness of your existence, and the hollowness of your politics.
The bosses?
They already have the technology to operate trains without drivers; the new stock on the Picc and Vic have it built-in already. The problem for LUL is that passengers consistently reject the idea of being stuck in a tunnel 200 feet underground in the morning peak with no possibility of human intervention should the on-train computer need re-booting. I "drive" Central Line trains which are supposed to get from end to end automatically, but I can barely remember one journey when I haven't had to intervene in some way to allow the train to continue.
I have a feeling I'll be retired long before they do away with drivers on the tube.
Yes, but perhaps also those who no longer have to do incredibly tedious or dangerous jobs because they are now automated.
) and threw their toys about how overpaid train drivers are and how DARE they quibble over a top rate of 30K a year.Last time there were threatened strike on the tube in London, lots of Urbanites did the usual thing (hey, we are all LibDem now in Lambeth right.) and threw their toys about how overpaid train drivers are and how DARE they quibble over a top rate of 30K a year.
Until I did the maths. And worked out that that was equivilent to MAYBE being able to afford to buy a flat in the ex council tower block my uncle lived in. In the arse of London; in the least accesable part of the capital. And then, the "best" piad, can't even afford the worst?
Something bloody wrong there.
And it is not something wrong that we deny a good wage to the men and women that take us to work, to college, to the shops, to a night out. I've enough mates who work in public transport. When it comes to my safety, I know who I'll put my trust in.
(a) People don't tend to buy houses on their own... I've got friends who earn less than £30k, and since they weren't train drivers, clubbed together and bought a house.
(b) Once you figure in six months holidays, its more like £45k a year... For a job that has, on the DLR, been replaced by a computer, thats more than the national average salary. And any time they want a pay rise, they go on strike... Do you really want London held hostage to a bunch of button pushers...?
(b) Once you figure in six months holidays, its more like £45k a year... For a job that has, on the DLR, been replaced by a computer, thats more than the national average salary. And any time they want a pay rise, they go on strike... Do you really want London held hostage to a bunch of button pushers...?
This one makes teutonic look almost sensibleproof positive that there's no point arguing with this idiot seeing as he reverts to the same fuckwitted arguments even after pages of detailed analysis of why they were threatening to go on strike

This one makes teutonic look almost sensible

The cunts that moan and bitch about tube drivers earning £30K (actually, with enhancements etc it's nearer £36K), haven't the balls to get themselves organised at work. These tossers would see organised workers brought down to their level, rather than fight to claw their way up to levels of decent wages and conditions. To all such forelock-tugging boss-loving fuck cunts I say: Stop trying to drag the others down to your miserable level and fight for the same rights!
Don't know where you live pal; but here in London, the cost of living and housing has been driven up by coke-snorting-cunts on obscene salariesFirstly, have you had a think about what would happen if everyone in London was given a minimum wage of £36k? That maybe, the cost of living and housing and everything else would go up just a teeny weeny bit?
Oh fuck off. You asked a question. Somebody gave you a response you didn't want; and, you try to move the goal posts.Things were a bit different in 1979, though, weren't they? Do you think you'd be equally effective in a similar situation today?
Going back to my example of the corner-shop worker in 2008: what would be his course of action?
Oh fuck off. You asked a question. Somebody gave you a response you didn't want; and, you try to move the goal posts.
A mini market not far from where I live has 100% Unite-T&G membership.
Define the 'going market rate'.Eh?
Where have I moved the goal posts from and to?
OK, but what would be the result of strike action that demanded wages significantly over the going market rate?
Define the 'going market rate'.
Things were a bit different in 1979, though, weren't they? Do you think you'd be equally effective in a similar situation today?

Define similar positions, the responsibilities therein etc.The rate at which similar positions are currently being advertised and accepted.
Define similar positions, the responsibilities therein etc.
Look up "similar" in the dictionary. You'll find it under "S".
What point are you trying to make?