Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Some tube strikes, just for a change.

What a cheery fellow you are...! One would think if LU where to finally implement driverless trains they'd have advanced the technology a bit... Dunno why this is "hollow politics". Do people really want to be driving trains in dark tunnels under London if the technology can be made available... :confused:

cos it's their job?? Would you like to be made unemployed by a robot?
 
Oh well, when you're lying in a tube train wreckage; sloshing around in your own faecal matter and piss while your life's blood draining away; maybe, only maybe, you’ll wonder if this could have been avoided if the train was equiped with a driver.

I hope as those final seconds hurtle towards you; and, your life begins its final phase of insignificance; I hope your last thoughts sum up the utter uselessness of your existence, and the hollowness of your politics.

:rolleyes: x 1,000,000
 
Oh well, when you're lying in a tube train wreckage; sloshing around in your own faecal matter and piss while your life's blood draining away; maybe, only maybe, you’ll wonder if this could have been avoided if the train was equiped with a driver.

I hope as those final seconds hurtle towards you; and, your life begins its final phase of insignificance; I hope your last thoughts sum up the utter uselessness of your existence, and the hollowness of your politics.

What a lot of nonsense.

The reason driverless trains haven't been introduced is not because they wouldn't be safe, but because of passenger perception. Arguably also because of union pressure acting in the interests of the drivers who don't want to lose their jobs.
 
They already have the technology to operate trains without drivers; the new stock on the Picc and Vic have it built-in already. The problem for LUL is that passengers consistently reject the idea of being stuck in a tunnel 200 feet underground in the morning peak with no possibility of human intervention should the on-train computer need re-booting. I "drive" Central Line trains which are supposed to get from end to end automatically, but I can barely remember one journey when I haven't had to intervene in some way to allow the train to continue.

I have a feeling I'll be retired long before they do away with drivers on the tube.

I didn't realise this, cheers Oxpecker.
 
Yes, but perhaps also those who no longer have to do incredibly tedious or dangerous jobs because they are now automated.

:confused:

Why would they? Or in your mind is everyone automatically allocated a less tedious/dangerous job, which pays at least the same money?
 
Last time there were threatened strike on the tube in London, lots of Urbanites did the usual thing (hey, we are all LibDem now in Lambeth right. ;) ) and threw their toys about how overpaid train drivers are and how DARE they quibble over a top rate of 30K a year.

Until I did the maths. And worked out that that was equivilent to MAYBE being able to afford to buy a flat in the ex council tower block my uncle lived in. In the arse of London; in the least accesable part of the capital. And then, the "best" piad, can't even afford the worst?

Something bloody wrong there.

And it is not something wrong that we deny a good wage to the men and women that take us to work, to college, to the shops, to a night out. I've enough mates who work in public transport. When it comes to my safety, I know who I'll put my trust in.
 
The cunts that moan and bitch about tube drivers earning £30K (actually, with enhancements etc it's nearer £36K), haven't the balls to get themselves organised at work. These tossers would see organised workers brought down to their level, rather than fight to claw their way up to levels of decent wages and conditions. To all such forelock-tugging boss-loving fuck cunts I say: Stop trying to drag the others down to your miserable level and fight for the same rights!
 
Last time there were threatened strike on the tube in London, lots of Urbanites did the usual thing (hey, we are all LibDem now in Lambeth right. ;) ) and threw their toys about how overpaid train drivers are and how DARE they quibble over a top rate of 30K a year.

Until I did the maths. And worked out that that was equivilent to MAYBE being able to afford to buy a flat in the ex council tower block my uncle lived in. In the arse of London; in the least accesable part of the capital. And then, the "best" piad, can't even afford the worst?

Something bloody wrong there.

And it is not something wrong that we deny a good wage to the men and women that take us to work, to college, to the shops, to a night out. I've enough mates who work in public transport. When it comes to my safety, I know who I'll put my trust in.

(a) People don't tend to buy houses on their own... I've got friends who earn less than £30k, and since they weren't train drivers, clubbed together and bought a house.

(b) Once you figure in six months holidays, its more like £45k a year... For a job that has, on the DLR, been replaced by a computer, thats more than the national average salary. And any time they want a pay rise, they go on strike... Do you really want London held hostage to a bunch of button pushers...?
 
(a) People don't tend to buy houses on their own... I've got friends who earn less than £30k, and since they weren't train drivers, clubbed together and bought a house.

(b) Once you figure in six months holidays, its more like £45k a year... For a job that has, on the DLR, been replaced by a computer, thats more than the national average salary. And any time they want a pay rise, they go on strike... Do you really want London held hostage to a bunch of button pushers...?

proof positive that there's no point arguing with this idiot seeing as he reverts to the same fuckwitted arguments even after pages of detailed analysis of why they were threatening to go on strike
 
(b) Once you figure in six months holidays, its more like £45k a year... For a job that has, on the DLR, been replaced by a computer, thats more than the national average salary. And any time they want a pay rise, they go on strike... Do you really want London held hostage to a bunch of button pushers...?

:D This one makes teutonic look almost sensible
 
proof positive that there's no point arguing with this idiot seeing as he reverts to the same fuckwitted arguments even after pages of detailed analysis of why they were threatening to go on strike

Yaay : Its the personal insults brigade... :rolleyes:
 
The cunts that moan and bitch about tube drivers earning £30K (actually, with enhancements etc it's nearer £36K), haven't the balls to get themselves organised at work. These tossers would see organised workers brought down to their level, rather than fight to claw their way up to levels of decent wages and conditions. To all such forelock-tugging boss-loving fuck cunts I say: Stop trying to drag the others down to your miserable level and fight for the same rights!

Firstly, have you had a think about what would happen if everyone in London was given a minimum wage of £36k? That maybe, the cost of living and housing and everything else would go up just a teeny weeny bit?

Anyway, setting that aside for now: your point about other people not having the "balls to get themselves organised at work".

This is an oft quoted argument in these kinds of discussions. But it's not a fair one because it is not equally easy for anyone to organise themselves in this way. The tube workers aren't blessed with a strong union because they've got more "balls" - its a result of a mixture of historical accident and also the nature of the work they do and the nature of the organisation they work for. This is one of the reasons I am unconvinced that strike action is the best way to encourage good pay and conditions, and favour the idea that this should be dealt with by the state through regulation and benefits instead. Workers in certain industries/positions have an unfair advantage over others in terms of the power they can exert through industrial action.

Perhaps you could talk me through how exactly the employee of a family-owned independent corner shop (AKA "forelock-tugging boss-loving fuck cunt") goes about joining/forming a union and then using his membership to improve his conditions? Assuming he has the "balls" to do so, of course.
 
There are ways of doing this, T. My first full-time job back in 1979 was for a company that had no union recognition. It was a small, private parcel delivery firm. When the T&G called a national one day stoppage, as the only union member I was the only employee to go on strike. Within 2 years I'd recruited the majority of staff to the union, I was negotiating on their behalf with the company and a year later I'd secured a recognition deal with the T&G for both London depots. As a result the wages and conditions improved enormously.

I'm not exceptional in any way, just someone who believes in the effectiveness of collective bargaining and is prepared to do something about it.
 
Things were a bit different in 1979, though, weren't they? Do you think you'd be equally effective in a similar situation today?

Going back to my example of the corner-shop worker in 2008: what would be his course of action?
 
Firstly, have you had a think about what would happen if everyone in London was given a minimum wage of £36k? That maybe, the cost of living and housing and everything else would go up just a teeny weeny bit?
Don't know where you live pal; but here in London, the cost of living and housing has been driven up by coke-snorting-cunts on obscene salaries
 
Things were a bit different in 1979, though, weren't they? Do you think you'd be equally effective in a similar situation today?

Going back to my example of the corner-shop worker in 2008: what would be his course of action?
Oh fuck off. You asked a question. Somebody gave you a response you didn't want; and, you try to move the goal posts.

A mini market not far from where I live has 100% Unite-T&G membership.
 
Things were a bit different in 1979, though, weren't they? Do you think you'd be equally effective in a similar situation today?

You're right, things were a bit different. Following on from the winter of discontent and the election of the Thatcher government we witnessed the largest recorded decline in trade union membership and a great raft of anti-trade union legislation.

Would I be equally effective? I don't know is the honest answer, but the RMT is the fastest growing union in Britain at the moment so somebody is doing something right.

Incidentally, the workers at a local Indian take-away have all joined the ISTC (community) union and wear their union T shirts as they work. Which is encouraging :)
 
Look up "similar" in the dictionary. You'll find it under "S".

What point are you trying to make?

My question was very straightforward. However, since you're obviously struggling; I’ll put it in such a way even you may, probably with a little help from your friends, Google, the British Library, 12 years of a wasted education, grasp. A R E n Y O U n R E A D Y?

Give me examples of comparable jobs; highlighting the responsibilities expected to be undertaken by people filling those jobs.
 
Back
Top Bottom