There will be more airlines going under but I wouldn't trust a single thing uttered by BA, the only sad thing is it's not going to be them that go bankrupt.
well, fewer competitors are good for BAs business

There will be more airlines going under but I wouldn't trust a single thing uttered by BA, the only sad thing is it's not going to be them that go bankrupt.

What a kind-hearted gesture, how nice of him to warn us in advance so we can make sure that any trips we book are booked with reputable airlines like, er, BA...
Unlikely, they made £193 million pre-tax profits last year.
- they expanded very far very rapidly and have something like 100 planes on order.
Yeah, because only rich people should be able to take holidays or to travel and see the world and meet new people, learn about different countries and cultures...![]()

So Willie Walsh, the chief exec of BA, is warning people that 30 smaller airlines (the type of airlines that have been reducing BA's passenger numbers and market share) are going to go under in the next few months...
What a kind-hearted gesture, how nice of him to warn us in advance so we can make sure that any trips we book are booked with reputable airlines like, er, BA...
There will be more airlines going under but I wouldn't trust a single thing uttered by BA, the only sad thing is it's not going to be them that go bankrupt.
To say that the demise of shitbucket airlines like XL means that the world will return to the 1950s is rubbish - what it means is the true cost of flying might start to be reflected in ticket price, and people who would use a cheap flight for a weekend break won't be doing so. No bad thing.
What's that got to do with artichokes in Belarus? Europe is perfectly well served by trains (most of which will actually take you to the town you want to go, as opposed to dropping you off 30 or 40 miles away at some dirt-strip of an airport that O'Leary has managed to con some subsidy out of the local government about.
Here's a simple thing. There is no 'right' to flying, and compared with many other things, it's actually cheaper now than it was in the 1950s, and you'd have to increase economy priced seats to over £2k for the London-New York run to make them comparable. Long time before that happens, and in the meantime, there's no great loss in the number of short flights being reduced.

There aren't trains to Ireland![]()
There are a number of ferries tho, and they've been perfectly servicable for people travelling to and fro cross the Irish sea for decades.
And?
Europe is perfectly well served by trains (most of which will actually take you to the town you want to go, as opposed to dropping you off 30 or 40 miles away at some dirt-strip of an airport that O'Leary has managed to con some subsidy out of the local government about.