Udo Erasmus
Well-Known Member
Jon Crudas, Leader of the Compass group supported 42 days
Jon Crudas, Leader of the Compass group supported 42 days
And the point you're making is what?
42 Days in the UK.
Does anyone know how many days people can get locked up in other countries such as the US or European countries + dodgy regimes?
Apparently, even China doesn't hold people for this long without trial. They're limit is 38 days - so that's the kind of yardstick we're measuring up against.

what's the USA limit?
Dai Davies supported the government![]()
That according to this poll, the British public support Brown.
Dai Davies supported the government![]()
Just shows what a bad situation Brown is in that even when going for a popular policy he still makes himself look bad and has come out of it looking desperate. There is nothing Brown can do now to turn things around, he's finished like John Major was.
Are you sure? He is the MP for Blaenau Gwent People's Voice?
David Davies is a Tory MP.
David Davies has resigned from the Tory frontbench and as an MP, though he is apparently going to stand in the by-election "without the support of Tory HQ".. utterly bizarre. His statement is at 1300.
Could be spectacular.
Nick Robinson now says this is solely over the 42 days issue, and the Libs (nearest rivals) are not going to run against him. If this is the case, hats off to him for putting his career on the line. Statement follows...
His statement makes it clear it's well beyond 42 days. Brings in ID cards, DNA database, CCTV: 'the slow strangulation of fundamental British freedoms by this government'.
A man of some principle.

A factual point: new labour didn't pass the parliament act which enables the government to force legislation through against the lords - that power has been available for years:Firstly, nobody here appears to have pointed out that the lords cannot "save us" any more - New Labour made sure of that, remember? All they can do is delay it by one parliamentary session (one year), after which it comes onto the statute books regardless of what the lords do.

A factual point: new labour didn't pass the parliament act which enables the government to force legislation through against the lords - that power has been available for years:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parliament_Act
The point about the Lords turning it down is not that they might be able to stop it outright but they can - as the hunting furore showed - make life a living hell for the government. For a leader with a strong grip on power this wouldn't matter *too* much but for someone in Brown's position? With any luck it will be political suicide![]()

I don't think the lords would do too much damage to Brown by fighting him tooth and nail over this, because he's got the public mood on his side - unlike the foxhunting fiasco, where opinion was pretty evenly split (unless you believe that stupid Cuntryside Alliance claim that '97% of the public say yes [to foxhunting]'), and other instances where the Parliament Act has been used in the past (eg. lowering the age of consent for same-sex sexual activity)
PS: Also, it's two parliamentary sessions over one year, not one session over one year.

Well done and fair play to him. What a shame the left has been unable to produce anyone capable of this - thus leaving the mantle of ""defender of liberties" to a tory. What a shocking indictemnt of the state of the left today and the times we live in.