pogofish said:A guy stops outside my house & skins one up before driving away from the city & out a country road almost every weeknight.
I remember the last time this came up, someone posted Canadian research that suggested people driving after a smoke may actually be safer than sober drivers. Anyone know if this has been further explored.
Personally, I'm in the not a good thing camp.
Aye. You just need to give the brain a little tickle. Too much is not goodfela fan said:As with drink though, if you've gotten yourself thoroughly stoned, maybe not a good idea. But one spliff, and you're away, nice and slow, careful, enjoying yourself, reaction times not impaired in the slightest, no road rage...
sojourner said:Again, I used to think the same, but have changed me mind over the years.
We'll agree to disagree on this I think, as I am right, and you only think you are![]()
![]()

Have you measured that properly? With the way weed distorts time perception I can't see how you can tell. It seems very unlikely to me.fela fan said:reaction times not impaired in the slightest
Ta mateYetman said:If I ever crash (which I havent once in 9 years of driving) then I'll let you know so you can cream yourself dry in your smuggery![]()

Spion said:Riding a motorbike 25 miles on mushrooms was quite memorable too, but that's one I won't be doing again

sojourner said:Ta mate![]()


You're very special, you know that yetty? Very specialYetman said:S'alright mate
In case its fatal I'll leave a note in a locket round my neck so my family can let you know![]()
Brainaddict said:Have you measured that properly? With the way weed distorts time perception I can't see how you can tell. It seems very unlikely to me.
With me it was on an ancient Yam 250 2 stroke about 25 years ago. And was at the height of the trip. All went well (apart from a freaked out pillion passenger and the sensation of constant car horns - on a mostly empty road.) I could never figure out how I managed to get round the roundaboutsjontz01 said:8 Hours after I'd ingested, and 3 after I'd come back down, I rode home.
Poi E said:Used to in my youth. But back then I had a fuck off fast car and wore a baseball cap the wrong way round, so I was clearly a complete twat.
sam/phallocrat said:Do you wear it the right way round now?
sojourner said:You're very special, you know that yetty? Very special


thursdog said:(looks like we a car full now, me and the aptly named passenger in the front, dirty santa and yetman building joints in the back)

did you not read my next post cobbles?http://www.urban75.net/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=6818504&postcount=24Cobbles said:That's as idiotic as saying that someone who drinks regularly gets used to the effects of the alcohol and compensates for it.
They may think that they're safe but that just proves what an irresponsible twat they are.
The trick is to just give the brain a little tickle, not get completely neanderthal-edDrRingDing said:Drink driving is and driving when stoned is different, although both impair you ability.
I hate driving whilst stoned, just because I get overwhelmed by all the different variables screaming at me for attention plus I end up thinking the old bill are lurking around for me.
Not what I'd call very pleasant.
Spion said:The trick is to just give the brain a little tickle, not get completely neanderthal-ed
agreedfela fan said:It's just my subjective judgment based on my experience. I feel very much sharper after a smoke than not.
But where these kinds of arguments break down is how we drive. For example on most roads you can take precautions over reaction time. If i'm driving three or four seconds behind a car, then that leaves me so much more time to react than some fucker right up my arse half a second or less behind me.
The biggest menaces on the roads are speedsters, with or without dope or alcohol in their blood. And if yer stoned, chances are you're in no rush to get where you're going...

thursdog said:(looks like we a car full now, me and the aptly named passenger in the front, dirty santa and yetman building joints in the back)
sam/phallocrat said:I appreciate people's concerns but suspect that they are, in the whole, based on presumption amd emotion (and perhaps the odd 'experience') rather than on evidence. As has been stated, very little time has been devoted to the effects of driving whilst blazed whilst we all know about the incontrovertible dangers of drink driving.
Kanda said:I don't get why people are arguing about driving under the influence of anything.
Cars are heavy, people are fragile. End of.
Why bother? Why put it down to chance or stubborness?
Just don't chance it. Tis stupid no?![]()
Radar said:If the proposed kits actually test for impairment, then yes I'm with the cops all the way !