not-bono-ever
meh
that post of mine sounds terribly macho - its not meant to be btw
hope it's just a rest!At this point i think i'll take a rest from this place
Don't use real names![]()

hope it's just a rest!
I hope it was worth the wait!
Not the words i used iirc.
Anyway, bringing up and disingenuously using bits from a conversation we had privately over a curry( to score a point) is out of order. I know a handful of people from here in real life and i wouldn't, nor expect them to be using things said in private (whatever the subject) to be splashed across the internet. At this point i think i'll take a rest from this place.
That seems like a good summary of the reality and conflicts that would have played out in his mind, in real time. And if I get past the headline comments about the bloke being a 'coward', it really is about what comes out of the mental conflicts you describe. Getting out of the car, approaching the murderer, shouting and the like might not have achieved much/anything, but my criticism is the bloke seemed to go for the 'let's get the fuck out of here' option without too much internal conflict. Ultimately, I'd like to have seen some evidence that he really was conflicted and at least thought about helping. His own words to the inquest suggest that wasn't the case.People who haven’t been in this sort of situation often think this kind of fighting is like the movies, all slow motion, dramatic balletic movement and cool music, together with a clarity about who’s who and what’s going on. The reality is more like the coordination of a load of six year olds playing football complicated by the shock factor, your mind doesn’t really want to accept what it’s seeing all whisked together with fear of getting killed.
84 seconds. That’s about a third of the time it taken to type this far.
I like to think I’d have done what he did, and stuck to the drills. There is a tiny part of the hero fantasist in me that I’d have jumped out and disarmed the cunt with a weapon constructed from a rolled up briefing paper and some cool ninja moves. There’s a fear in me that the most likely option is that I’d have run blindly forward towards the shouting and added the not very effective efforts of a fat middle aged bloke, with some decent muscle memory but not much muscle left, to the six year old football match, probably hampering people who were about to rock up having brought guns to a knife fight. There’s a worry I’d have just frozen.
The reality is I don’t know what I’d have done. And nor does anyone else who hasn’t been in an attack like this.
Ultimately, I'd like to have seen some evidence that he really was conflicted and at least thought about helping. His own words to the inquest suggest that wasn't the case.

A Met chief stayed in his car during an attack. That’s not leadership | Gaby HinsliffThe car from which Mackey instinctively wanted to leap, he told the inquest this week into PC Keith Palmer’s death, before deciding that – as he was in shirtsleeves with no police radio or protective kit ...
I think she's got it about right, esp. with this:
t’s horribly unfair to call Craig Mackey a coward, particularly from the safety of civilian armchairs. He made what was in all probability the rational decision. But it does not, somehow, look like the decision of a leader.
I don't. It suggests that, in her view, leaders should make decisions that appear irrational. But that wasn't the point of the post. Rather, that you were mistaken in your understanding of his testimony to the inquest.I think she's got it about right, esp. with this:
I
Well, I'm not convinced it was a rational decision, beyond of course a rational survival instinct. Seeing some violent attach unfolding in real time, with the possibility it could carry on, move to another location, you need to at least stay around to see if anything can be done (all the aforementioned shouting, distracting, helping restrain the murderer etc.). But the thing about leadership is the core of it for me. He was still an active copper, actually witnessing a murderous attack happening. It's pretty central to the job description that you do something other than leg it in those situations - that's what a copper is supposed to do. Ditto in terms of backing up your colleagues/underlings.I don't. It suggests that, in her view, leaders should make decisions that appear irrational.
I disagree but either way that's a shift of the goalposts. First you didn't think that he'd expressed conflict at the inquest at all. When it's pointed out that he has, you're not convinced it was rational.Well, I'm not convinced it was a rational decision, beyond of course a rational survival instinct. Seeing some violent attach unfolding in real time, with the possibility it could carry on, move to another location, you need to at least stay around to see if anything can be done (all the aforementioned shouting, distracting, helping restrain the murderer etc.). But the thing about leadership is the core of it for me. He was still an active copper, actually witnessing a murderous attack happening. It's pretty central to the job description that you do something other than leg it in those situations - that's what a copper is supposed to do. Ditto in terms of backing up your colleagues/underlings.

I hope you come back soon!I hope it was worth the wait!
Not the words i used iirc.
Anyway, bringing up and disingenuously using bits from a conversation we had privately over a curry( to score a point) is out of order. I know a handful of people from here in real life and i wouldn't, nor expect them to be using things said in private (whatever the subject) to be splashed across the internet. At this point i think i'll take a rest from this place.
Isnt it a war crime to use D.U.P?i would have got arlene foster or another mp and used them as a human shield, thrusting the jihadi back into a corner
it's a war crime not to use them thusIsnt it a war crime to use D.U.P?
it's a war crime not to use them thus
Top munitions based punage.Isnt it a war crime to use D.U.P?