Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

sir craig mackey: and other craven cops

I've had a few bad hidings off of the cunts in my younger days. There was never less than three of them, this cunt was never going to go front up whether there were arms involved or not. As mentioned above, he could have at least distracted the fucknut with the blade.
even if he'd only whimpered like a mewling child or squealed like a pig.
 
Well of course it does, but then it is designed to. Now everyone is talking about Mackey rather than who made (and why) the decision to switch from armed officers being on fixed points at Parliament to them being on patrol.

The tactical details, unless driven by budget cuts are fairly bullet proof. You can’t plan the perfect reaction/response to a constantly mutating threat. Things aren’t “wrong”, rather lessons are learned and new responses developed. It’s like screaming at the firemen at Grenfell for making on the ground, critical decisions within their current “playbook” while facing an extraordinary event

Anyways. Many take the wage to “protect” society, we complain when they don’t step up, it’s unfortunate that the ones that get stuck in are also the ones tasering disabled grannies in the face and pepper spraying teens
 
The tactical details, unless driven by budget cuts are fairly bullet proof. You can’t plan the perfect reaction/response to a constantly mutating threat. Things aren’t “wrong”, rather lessons are learned and new responses developed. It’s like screaming at the firemen at Grenfell for making on the ground, critical decisions within their current “playbook” while facing an extraordinary event

Anyways. Many take the wage to “protect” society, we complain when they don’t step up, it’s unfortunate that the ones that get stuck in are also the ones tasering disabled grannies in the face and pepper spraying teens

That isn't what I meant. If the decision to move those officers was made because of a tactical assessment or for some operational reason, fine (as long as the rationale is debated honestly). If it was made on the ground of some other reason like the aesthetics then it isn't.
 
That isn't what I meant. If the decision to move those officers was made because of a tactical assessment or for some operational reason, fine (as long as the rationale is debated honestly). If it was made on the ground of some other reason like the aesthetics then it isn't.

Fair one, I misinterpreted your post
 
When you look through the detail of what he told the inquest:
Acting Met chief 'witnessed Westminster attack from inside car'
he makes it clear he was going off what one of the PCs said about locking the door. Even if the advice from the PC was right in terms of approved practice, it's fucking cowardly hiding behind a junior's decision and trying to manoeuvre that PC into the limelight. Also, it wasn't just about the attack on the copper, the cunt with the knife could have gone on to murder several more.
 
... Also, it wasn't just about the attack on the copper, the cunt with the knife could have gone on to murder several more.

Including, for example, the most senior Police Officer in the lead counter-terrorism agency.

The attacker could have been wearing a suicide vest, his target might have been the Mets' senior command in order to paralyze it's ability to respond to another, much larger, much more elaborate attack - a scenario that is well established in counter-terrorism planning, and an idea well established in terrorist doctrine.

His job was to stay alive in order to command the Met response, and if that means leaving others to do their jobs then so be it - it might not look good, but he's not paid to look good, he's paid to command the Mets' counter-terrorism response to, potentially, a large, geographically spread attack.

The very obvious example of the senior officer getting stuck in was at Goose-Green in the Falklands: 2PARA were a bit bogged down, their CO led a section attack against a machine gun post in order to re-establish momentum, and he was killed. The battalions command and fire-support apparatus was paralyzed for a while and it took casualties it should not have taken while a new command was established.

Lt Col Jones richly earned his VC, but leading section attacks was not his job, and the battle, and his battalion, suffered as a result of him being killed instead of running the battle and using the assets given to him.

If Mackey had got involved, been killed/injured, and then a much larger terrorist attack taken place - the response to which would be more confused as command of it was interrupted - he would be slated for playing the role of a PC, not a Commissioner of the Met.
 
Including, for example, the most senior Police Officer in the lead counter-terrorism agency.

The attacker could have been wearing a suicide vest, his target might have been the Mets' senior command in order to paralyze it's ability to respond to another, much larger, much more elaborate attack - a scenario that is well established in counter-terrorism planning, and an idea well established in terrorist doctrine.

His job was to stay alive in order to command the Met response, and if that means leaving others to do their jobs then so be it - it might not look good, but he's not paid to look good, he's paid to command the Mets' counter-terrorism response to, potentially, a large, geographically spread attack.

The very obvious example of the senior officer getting stuck in was at Goose-Green in the Falklands: 2PARA were a bit bogged down, their CO led a section attack against a machine gun post in order to re-establish momentum, and he was killed. The battalions command and fire-support apparatus was paralyzed for a while and it took casualties it should not have taken while a new command was established.

Lt Col Jones richly earned his VC, but leading section attacks was not his job, and the battle, and his battalion, suffered as a result of him being killed instead of running the battle and using the assets given to him.

If Mackey had got involved, been killed/injured, and then a much larger terrorist attack taken place - the response to which would be more confused as command of it was interrupted - he would be slated for playing the role of a PC, not a Commissioner of the Met.

Have you got any credible sources for that detail

Not disagreeing, just can’tremember reading anything “from the horses mouth” to support that position.
 
Including, for example, the most senior Police Officer in the lead counter-terrorism agency.

The attacker could have been wearing a suicide vest, his target might have been the Mets' senior command in order to paralyze it's ability to respond to another, much larger, much more elaborate attack - a scenario that is well established in counter-terrorism planning, and an idea well established in terrorist doctrine.

His job was to stay alive in order to command the Met response, and if that means leaving others to do their jobs then so be it - it might not look good, but he's not paid to look good, he's paid to command the Mets' counter-terrorism response to, potentially, a large, geographically spread attack.

The very obvious example of the senior officer getting stuck in was at Goose-Green in the Falklands: 2PARA were a bit bogged down, their CO led a section attack against a machine gun post in order to re-establish momentum, and he was killed. The battalions command and fire-support apparatus was paralyzed for a while and it took casualties it should not have taken while a new command was established.

Lt Col Jones richly earned his VC, but leading section attacks was not his job, and the battle, and his battalion, suffered as a result of him being killed instead of running the battle and using the assets given to him.

If Mackey had got involved, been killed/injured, and then a much larger terrorist attack taken place - the response to which would be more confused as command of it was interrupted - he would be slated for playing the role of a PC, not a Commissioner of the Met.
Well, he's trying to hide behind that logic, suggesting his first reaction was to get stuck in, almost a case of 'hold me back, hold me back'. He says he was about to get out of the car until:
“One of the PCs, quite rightfully, said: ‘Get out, make safe, go, shut the door,’ which he did, and it was the right thing to do.

“That’s when I thought: ‘I have got to start putting everything we need in place. We have got no protective equipment, no radio, I have got two colleagues with me who are quite distressed,’ so we moved out.”
Essentially, that he wasn't aware of the stuff you mention, had to be reminded. Hmmm... But most of all its about whether you step up when one of your mates is facing danger. He didn't.
 

I’m looking for specifics. The Chris Keeble take over was apparently dynamic, smooth (trained for)and i’ve not seen him or any other paras suggesting a paralysis of command

As for fire support apparatus i’m Not sure what you mean, external support units? ie artillery. Or his support company (who anecdotally offered fire support but were told to fuck of by Jones)

While having a Sunray down moment isn’t an everyday occurrence a military unit isn’t just one man everyone trains up.

Apologies i’m being very picky about specifics

I still agree he shouldn’t have been leaping around

There is analysis that his death and the transfer from a system of tactical command known as 'restrictive control' to the alternative 'directive command' actually improved the situation

A good book to read if you want to get balls deep in military doctrine debate is

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Not-Mentioned-Despatches-History-Mythology/dp/0718830164


Anyways back on topic ACAB
 
The blokes clearly laid off the Phys and does not do MMA or anything like it so his ability to do anything useful and frankly he's more useful alive than becoming a casualty I'd have tried something and achieved nothing unless the stabbing bastard was looking the wrong way then meet very heavy padlock attached to a chain :D
 
Bloke did exactly what he should’ve done.

Anyone who thinks the fat old fart should’ve jumped out and tackled the cunt with two big knives and possible explosives, whilst unarmed and knowing armed plod will be arriving shortly, and having been told to bugger off by his protection officer, is a twat.
 
Last edited:
Bloke did exactly what he should’ve done.

Anyone who thinks the fat old fart should’ve jumped out and tackled the cunt with two big knives and possible explosives, whilst unarmed and knowing armed plod will be arriving shortly, and having been told to bugger off by his protection officer, is a twat.
Soz where are you getting this protection officer from?
 
I will stick up for him - one of the things drilled into senior Police Officers, Army Officers, Politicians and Intelligence Officers is they do what they are told by their protection officers, even if they are Chief of the Defence Staff with 40 years of throat-cutting behind them and their protection officer hasn't gone through puberty yet.

50yo fat blokes who've been driving a desk for 15 years have no place in a fist and fire fight - whatever he might have wanted to do, and whatever he might have been able to achieve, his duty as a very senior officer was to do what his protection team told him to do.

I've no end of criticism of the Met over the way they handled the security of parliament and the safety of the people providing that security, but this - for me - isn't a matter for that criticism.
Soz where are you getting this protection officer bit from?
 
likesfish post first page. Driver/bodyguard/whoever. kebabking is making the only sense on this thread.
Only in the link here
When you look through the detail of what he told the inquest:
Acting Met chief 'witnessed Westminster attack from inside car'
he makes it clear he was going off what one of the PCs said about locking the door. Even if the advice from the PC was right in terms of approved practice, it's fucking cowardly hiding behind a junior's decision and trying to manoeuvre that PC into the limelight. Also, it wasn't just about the attack on the copper, the cunt with the knife could have gone on to murder several more.
No mention of such, just a stray pc
 
No mention of such, just a stray pc
It's still the correct advice. The choice was to stop the car and put himself and everyone in it at risk, or to do his actual job and get away to command the response while allowing properly trained and equipped firearms plod, who were a few seconds away, to do theirs. The comparisons with Lt Col Jones are apt. He was very heavily criticised for his action at Goose Green. No doubt those who are now suggesting that Mackey should've committed suicide at the PoW are the same people who'd be pillorying him had he done so.
 
Last edited:
I guess it looks bad this guy staying in the car, but to be honest, how likely would you have been out there unarmed tacking a knife wielding jihadi?
 
Bloke did exactly what he should’ve done.

Anyone who thinks the fat old fart should’ve jumped out and tackled the cunt with two big knives and possible explosives, whilst unarmed and knowing armed plod will be arriving shortly, and having been told to bugger off by his protection officer, is a twat.

He shouldn’t be a fat old fart though, there are ongoing standards of fitness to be met if you wanna be a filth, if this yellow bellied streak of piss is not fit for the job he should fuck off and do something else.

The real reason he stood by and did nothing whilst his ‘colleague’ was butchered before his eyes is that PC Palmer wasn’t a colleague at all, he was a minion in the eyes of this cunty-chops boss.
 
Back
Top Bottom