Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Sinead O'Connor

Interesting that she is equating race (skin colour) and faith. "white people" "if that's what non-muslims are called".

I know she has her daemons, and I wish her health, but those words, those concepts, from a person with her reach, are, to put it charitably, deeply unhelpful.
 
Right, so into defending this. Something the idiot herself recognises is racist. Because singing is her livelihood - apparently. I imagine a roofer shouting such nonsense would not be cut suck sickening slack. Back to your giants.

oconnor-twat-jpg.183476

Have a read of the background to that tweet...the absolute islamophobia she was subjected to when she announced she had converted to Islam.

For the love of God, please stop sharing Sinéad O'Connor's tweets about white people
 
Interesting that she is equating race (skin colour) and faith. "white people" "if that's what non-muslims are called".

I know she has her daemons, and I wish her health, but those words, those concepts, from a person with her reach, are, to put it charitably, deeply unhelpful.


Context matters. See previous post. People targetted her for becoming muslim
 
Context matters. See previous post. People targetted her for becoming muslim
Sure, but the response to that is “don’t be bigoted”, not “here’s some bigotry of my own”.

I like her. I empathise with her issues. I hope she finds peace and happiness. But these words were not skilful. It’s not helpful to excuse them, whatever they are a response to.
 
The above went into justifying the content, not just excusing it.
The article does indeed try to justify.

And it’s worth saying that her words might well be an angry response to the shit she’s been showered with. And I also condemn that shit. Over the decades she’s been vilified personally, in misogynist ways, as well as anti-Muslim bigotry. Nobody deserves that. But that does not mean her words, their meaning, their effect, are acceptable.
 
The article does indeed try to justify.

And it’s worth saying that her words might well be an angry response to the shit she’s been showered with. And I also condemn that shit. Over the decades she’s been vilified personally, in misogynist ways, as well as anti-Muslim bigotry. Nobody deserves that. But that does not mean her words, their meaning, their effect, are acceptable.
No i meant lupa's post here
 
No i meant lupa's post here
Oh Jesus. Lupa , sorry, that’s nonsense. We all love Sinead here, but that’s not a good argument. Stick to having empathy for her issues, the abuse she’s showered with, and so on. But it’s possible to deplore both what she’s received as well as what she’s said. (And there’s no need to attempt equivalence or anything else).
 
So you responded to that with:

white men have fucked up the world. Do you think otherwise?

Who has more power, an unemployed white man in Ballymun, or someone like Rosalind Brewer?

The people with the power to fuck up the world are the captains of capital, whatever their gender, sexuality or colour.
 
So you responded to that with:



Who has more power, an unemployed white man in Ballymun, or someone like Rosalind Brewer?

The people with the power to fuck up the world are the captains of capital, whatever their gender, sexuality or colour.

Obviously Joe Soap has no power.....at all. This doesn't stop some from being prejudicial or racist or islamophobes.
 
Obviously Joe Soap has no power.....at all.
So the description of the people who ‘fuck up the world’ that you used earlier was cast too wide. A better description would be “the ruling class”.

For example, the people the protestors in Hong Kong are opposing are not white men. Carrie Lam, the chief official, is neither white nor a man.

This is why class matters as an analysis of power. It is about structure.
 
Never mind her confusion, this stands out to me as one of the greatest deliveries of a song ever. It's jaw-dropping. She is fierce and beautiful and vulnerable and wonderful in these six minutes.

 
Back
Top Bottom