Dubversion said:Should have stuck with the original plan of situating the new Israel in Alaska![]()
Stalin did actually give the Jews their own state in Siberia, didnt prove very popular aws you can imagine, though there are still a few Jews there.
Dubversion said:Should have stuck with the original plan of situating the new Israel in Alaska![]()
dangerous talk, unless you're taking the pissDubversion said:Should have stuck with the original plan of situating the new Israel in Alaska![]()
zenie said:Is that really what happened or is it open to interpretation?
why is it any more dangerous that the beta zion which was created in russia before stalin wiped it out... which was also suggested as being the place to rehome european Jewry after the second world war... It wasn't just a case of the land round Jerusalm well make a state there... (although the actual lines drawn up were that arbitary...)jonH said:dangerous talk, unless you're taking the piss
GarfieldLeChat said:Zenie are you being totally serious?
GarfieldLeChat said:I mean you cannot really be oblivious to this situation consdierign you will have grown up with it along with most other people...
GarfieldLeChat said:Zenie are you being totally serious?
I mean you cannot really be oblivious to this situation consdierign you will have grown up with it along with most other people...
i didn't say it was more dangerous, but suggesting the jews have a state in alaska is a bit like saying the Romani people have a state in Madagascar.GarfieldLeChat said:why is it any more dangerous that the beta zion which was created in russia before stalin wiped it out... which was also suggested as being the place to rehome european Jewry after the second world war... It wasn't just a case of the land round Jerusalm well make a state there... (although the actual lines drawn up were that arbitary...)
Zenie are you being totally serious?
I mean you cannot really be oblivious to this situation consdierign you will have grown up with it along with most other people...
jonH said:i didn't say it was more dangerous, but suggesting the jews have a state in alaska is a bit like saying the Romani people have a state in Madagascar.
Both the Jews and the Romani have Eurasian origins and should be allowed to keep them, I'm not into ethnic cleansing
you said they "should have stuck with the original plan"Dubversion said:It was a reference to a very real suggestion at the time, that was put before Congress. Dumbass
jonH said:you said they "should have stuck with the original plan"
jonH said:dangerous talk, unless you're taking the piss
jonH said:taht's what I hoped
yes that's what i said entriely you've got be bang to rights...Dubversion said:so it's wrong for someone to ask questions about something they feel they don't know about now?
patronising twat.

patronising twat...Dubversion said:i was making a reference to something, not agreeing with it.
are you being serious, it's hard to tellGarfieldLeChat said:asumptive twat...
![]()

but techncially, and without dissapearing down a rabbit hole you'd have to conceed that moving people of shared and common identity from europe and moving them to the middle east would be ethnic cleansing, ie the systematic remvoeal of a group of people to displace or remove their cultral genus from the given area/state...jonH said:i didn't say it was more dangerous, but suggesting the jews have a state in alaska is a bit like saying the Romani people have a state in Madagascar.
Both the Jews and the Romani have Eurasian origins and should be allowed to keep them, I'm not into ethnic cleansing
I was merely questioning or really astonished that in all the time Zenie has been both here on the boards and around members of the boards she wasn't more clued up. That's all, it's not a particularlly snide comment to make or patronising either for that matter. Unless of course you are dubversion who'll see snide in my comments if i offered him cake...jonH said:are you being serious, it's hard to tell![]()
the Jews are a Semitic people like the Arabs, their culture and language centres around the middle east.GarfieldLeChat said:but techncially, and without dissapearing down a rabbit hole you'd have to conceed that moving people of shared and common identity from europe and moving them to the middle east would be ethnic cleansing, ie the systematic remvoeal of a group of people to displace or remove their cultral genus from the given area/state...
and then do it big timejonH said:it's obvious that some people on these boards are not into discussion or new ideas,
surely at whcih point then technically at the return of the Messiah then there'd be no need for such trivaialities as statehood or nations...jonH said:the Jews are a Semitic people like the Arabs, their culture and language centres around the middle east.
I am not suggesting that the State of Israel is anyway desirable but if they did have a state surely it should be somewhere between the Euphrates and the Nile;
imo we should wait until the return of the Messiah![]()
and then do it big time
but yes techncially there can be no isreal until such time as such the tirbes of david were all concentraited in philistine (palestine) so there is no more an inherent rigth or claim to it by anyone of these tribes other than the ones who provided the name to the region ... 
go on thenDubversion said:shall we take a random sample of your usual standard of contribution to serious threads, jonh? like your comments on the killing badgers thread etc?
you're a hypocrite as well as an inane cunt, then.

The Jews were a Semitic people, once. Now we're hybrids. Once the Diaspora occurred we intermixed with just about every people and culture we came across. Very few Jews are "pure" Semites, just as, to a lesser degree because of their insularity, Arabs aren't.jonH said:the Jews are a Semitic people like the Arabs, their culture and language centres around the middle east.
can we have just one thread you particiapte in which isn't about your elephantine ego please, this threads topic of discussion is should isreal have been given to the jews. not Dubversion yet again feels some anynomous person on the internet has trodden on his cock.Dubversion said:shall we take a random sample of your usual standard of contribution to serious threads, jonh? like your comments on the killing badgers thread etc?
you're a hypocrite as well as an inane cunt, then.
samskara is valid hindu philosophy and eating less beef and milk products would reduce the risk of cattle spreading TB, you are a sad and angry little manDubversion said:fuck off and die, garf, there's a good lad.
and jonh - the threads about killing badgers and your STERLING contributions to blagsta's thread about identity in theory this morning should serve as perfect examples of your willingness to debate.
dick
ViolentPanda said:The Jews were a Semitic people, once. Now we're hybrids. Once the Diaspora occurred we intermixed with just about every people and culture we came across. Very few Jews are "pure" Semites, just as, to a lesser degree because of their insularity, Arabs aren't.
As for language and culture, the state of Israel's language is modern Hebrew, a synthesis of G-d alone knows how many borrowings, and more "middle eastern" by those borrowings than anything else. Jews, however, tend to speak the language of their host country, and then possibly one of the culture tongues such as Yiddish or Ladino. Jewish culture is as little centred around the middle east as it's languages are, except insofar as religious observance is concerned, but bear in mind that one doesn't have to be observant to be a Jew.
jonH said:samskara is valid hindu philosophy and eating less beef and milk products would reduce the risk of cattle spreading TB, you are a sad and angry little man
this might help you but i doubt it

zenie said:Is that really what happened or is it open to interpretation?