Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Should economics be a compulsory subject in schools?

The cynic in me says that decent education about personal finances is incompatible with an economic system that relies on being able to take people for a ride. If we really cared about preventing people getting into terrible economic situations, we could legislate against some of the things that send them down that path. I suppose we do this a bit, but there are still some obscene interest rates and suchlike around. I quite like rules that make bills easier to understand, but some smallprint remains inaccessible to the everyman.

Not to mention the quantity of media reports and television programs that give people bad advice about money, eg all the stuff that encouraged people to buy houses at silly prices during the bubble. People giving investment advice are salesmen by and large, and do not often have our best interests at heart.

The wider economic system could certainly be taught more in school, although it is a messy subject, complicated for multiple reasons. It is kept murky, this is a great way to prevent people from taking part in politics effectively. Another problem is that its not exactly a science like physics, the economic rules are more about politics and personal opinion than any rules of nature.
 
I'd like to see a combined history/economics/geography gcse tbh.

I know my history well, but have trouble finding countries on maps:mad:
 
Yes, that too. Although statistics ought to be covered as part of maths, really.

You don't really need to know much in the way of technical stats (maybe mean, median and mode) but what you do need is to be able to analyse data or look at somebody else's analysis and say "that's bollocks". Best school training I had in that was in science, even at GCSE, because you have to present results. Enlarging on that a bit would be handy - it's useful for all sorts of subjects as well as generally for realising when you're being fed a load of shite.

(History was best in terms of analysing sources for reliability, another vital skill, but that's not strictly relevant to this thread.)
 
Economics is the study of how limited resources are distributed in a society of unlimited wants. No one ever said HOW those resources should be distributed.

This should not be confused with either personal finance nor international finance.
 
If everyone understood the basic principles of how the modern world economy operates all hell would break loose. Cobblestones and petrol bombs would be flying everywhere amid cries of 'you cannot be fucking serious!'

E. F. Shumacher's 'Small is Beautiful' should be required reading in schools IMO.
 
Economics is the study of how limited resources are distributed in a society of unlimited wants.

Unlimited wants are consciously fabricated as a result of economic practices. Without marketing, indoctrination, mass media etc I suspect most people would be happy with little more than a roof over their heads and food on the table. And perhaps the occasional pint.
 
I think it's worth covering the basics in compulsory general studies/social studies/citizenship/whatever classes rather than just maths and science.
 
What do 'citizenship' classes entail anyway? I imagine them being something along the lines of;

DO AS YOU'RE FUCKING TOLD OR GO TO PRISON. YOUR GOVERNMENT IS IN CONTROL OF YOUR LIFE AND ALWAYS WILL BE. THE SOONER YOU ACCEPT THIS THE EASIER YOUR LIFE WILL BE.

...repeated ad nauseam through loudspeakers while strobe lights flash continuously.
 
Back
Top Bottom