tbaldwin said:Your interest in immigration seems to exist primarily as a way of trying to get back at a couple of people who disagree with you.

Fruitloop said:Durruti's Atherstone fire thread has the word 'migrants' in the OP.
tbaldwin said:nino. Durruti started a thread on the Atherstone fire...You were the one who started going on and on about immigration on it.
Fruitloop said:Durruti's thread about the Atherstone fire was about migration from the outset.
nino_savatte said:I see you managed to contradict yourself again. Here, you say
Then, in a breathtaking volte face, you claim
What is odd is that you see no contradiction between these two bits of text - both of them written by you.
So what do you want? I don't think you're sure. All I know is that you claim not to "hate" immigrants but you demand some form of local control over immigration that is administered by the local 'working class' in their 'communities'.
I take it you are familiar with The League of Gentlemen?

oh boy .. so was it SOLELY about that? what else did the OP say?Fruitloop said:Durruti's Atherstone fire thread has the word 'migrants' in the OP.
Fruitloop said:Durruti's Atherstone fire thread has the word 'migrants' in the OP.
tbaldwin said:nino. Durruti started a thread on the Atherstone fire...You were the one who started going on and on about immigration on it.
You seem self obsessed. Your interest in immigration seems to exist primarily as a way of trying to get back at a couple of people who disagree with you.
To be honest, i dont think you have shown much interest in immigration and its national and international consequences.
At best you seem to be stuck in the past,not recognising how immigration is presently being used.
You seem self obsessed.
Your interest in immigration seems to exist primarily as a way of trying to get back at a couple of people who disagree with you.
durruti02 said:no no contradiction ..
Lock&Light said:modern bulk warehouse ; cheap food ; supermarkets ; profits ; decent farmers ; vegtables ; migrants ; slave conditions ; gang masters ; health and safety ; spiv britain ; angry/sick
All of these words featured in that OP. Which one(s) do you think best represents what that thread was about?


nino_savatte said:Hardly, you lot dominate this forum with your incessant (that means "ceaseless") threads on immigration and if anyone takes an opposing position to either you, durutti or you wee chums, they are treated to abuse, misrepresentation and lies..

Grandma Death said:Not to mention the facile labels like 'white liberal middle class' and 'no borders supporters'![]()

nino_savatte said:I find it interesting that those calling for a "debate on immigration" are those people who are least interested in having a debate. I also find that it is always the same voices who demand that 'we' have a 'debate' on immigration. Those voices were around in the 50's, 60's and 70's and to suggest that circumstances have suddenly' changed' now that we are in the 21st century is a myth.
nino_savatte said:Exactly; if you don't agree with the crew, then you're a "liberal" or even "neo-liberal". I had one accuse me of "playing into the hands of the BNP" because I didn't support their proposals for immigration controls.![]()

Pigeon said:Think yerself lucky. I got called "fascistic".![]()

brasicattack said:Would it not be better to merge all immigrants in to one giant person?![]()

tbaldwin said:shown much interest in immigration and its national and international consequences.
At best you seem to be stuck in the past,not recognising how immigration is presently being used.
Darcus Howe said:Those of us who have been here half a century or more will recall the old battered quote "wogs begin at Calais." Calais is the French port which was the main connection point from England to Europe five decades ago. This was before we all started flying everywhere. "Wog" is the shorthand version of "golliwog", a degrading reference to those of us with dark skins. This term of abuse also referred to whites who were not British- French, Italians, Germans, Russians et al, none of whom were welcome, and the saying evoked a combination of xenophobia and racism.
Though the often quoted sentence has fallen into disuse, the sentiment still courses through the veins of white citizens of the UK. It reappears at election times with amazing regularity...With the election for Mayor of London due in the next few nmonths, and national elections not too fardown the road, xenophobia and racism may return drip-by-drio, inevitably to grow with great force when the election dates are set. The modern reference to immigration tells us that "wogs begin at Calais" is returning in an ever changing form.
Our Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, has fired the first shot. And I quote: "British jobs for British workers". Not for Africans, Asians, Caribeans. Not for white Europeans, with particular reference to Poles, Lithuanians, Czechs...From cities to rural areas of this green and unpleasant land are scattered Polish builders and other Eastern Europeans who farm, workers who plant, tend and reap fruit and veg. A swift tour of London will inform the stranger that the trail in food production leads all the way to the supermarkets where new Europeans, Africans and the offspring of Caribbean peoples serve...Almost daily, the national newspapers, radio and TV engage in scaremongering by quoting statistics. They tell us that in 50 years time there will be 20 million more people living in the country. This inflated figure was issued deliberately into frighterning the white population into believe that they will be over-run by "wogs".
And the voters are asked to chose which political party has the most powerful border control programme within which the UK is to be ring fenced.
Our political leaders are getting closer and closer to mass deportation if they dare. Enoch Powell once used the term "repatriation". In short, "go back where you come from." Some will claim that it is the only way to win the war on terror, to defeat gun crime, to empty overcrowded prisons, to offer white citizens smaller classes in schools, to reduce the numbers of us who seek care in hospitals.
This tiny island inches its way to barbarism.
Pigeon said:Talking of "the past", some interesting points are raised in an article in this week's Voice.
Gordon Brown wants to see people in the UK in work, it hardly makes him Adolf Tyndall does it....
tbaldwin said:Shame about that. I have always quite liked Darcus Howe..Especially enjoyed his programme with Bernard Manning.
But here he seems to be falling into the trap of parroting nonsense from misguided white liberals.

Pigeon said:I'm still waiting for a source for your oft-repeated claim that 99% of British blacks and Asians are calling for an immediate cap on immigration, by the way...![]()
while clearly afro caribean british have reason to be worried about emotive electionering and rabble rousing they have more to be worried by the use by capitalism of new sources of cheap labour. Capitalism has always used differrent sources of migrants in suceeding waves of cheap labour .. so the preceeding ones always get shafted ..chymaera said:I don't know about 99%, but BBC News 24 seems to have no trouble at all finding ones who will state just that on TV.
tbaldwin said:Shame about that. I have always quite liked Darcus Howe..Especially enjoyed his programme with Bernard Manning.
But here he seems to be falling into the trap of parroting nonsense from misguided white liberals.
Its plainly silly to link Gordon Browns interpretation of " British Jobs for British Workers" with that of the Holocaust deniers and racists of yesteryear.
Gordon Brown wants to see people in the UK in work, it hardly makes him Adolf Tyndall does it....
durruti02 said:while clearly afro caribean british have reason to be worried about emotive electionering and rabble rousing they have more to be worried by the use by capitalism of new sources of cheap labour. Capitalism has always used differrent sources of migrants in suceeding waves of cheap labour .. so the preceeding ones always get shafted ..
nino_savatte said:What utter tosh. So "afro caribean british" (sic) shouldn't worry about racism or the fact that the BNP still retain their desire to 'repatriate' anyone who isn't white? What you're proposing here is another division of the working class; in other words, you want to pit workers against workers.
Funny kind of w/c solidarity that.

durruti02 said:you blind or just a wind up?![]()