Andy the Don
Wise men say only fools..
Shawshank Redemption - crap/not crap
neither, just rather overrated.
neither, just rather overrated.
Andy the Don said:Shawshank Redemption - crap/not crap
neither, just rather overrated.
spanglechick said:My take, fwiw.
This is not a classic of the film makers art. It is superior entertainment though. It's like the difference between literature and fiction. Authors like Helen Fielding/Nick Hornby/Tony Parsons/Alexander McColl Smith/JK Rowling are immensely popular, and their books are favourites of a massive number of people. But they're not Austen/Greene/Murdoch/Wells and to compare them is facile and pointless. And so with film.
I'd contend that most people want escapism and entertainment from their £6.50 at the box office - and films like shawshank deliver that. It's not a stupid film, but it does tell an easy-to-like unchallenging story (don't like films with feelgood endings? - steer away from films with the word "redemption" in the title...). The photography and direction isn't groundbreaking - but does give a nice period feel, and the acting is pretty good. The plot is emotional and emotive - rather like a soap opera, and really deals with no complex issues or developments, and i think this is one of the reasons for it's popularity, but also the biggest stick critics have to beat it with.
There's a difference between "best film ever" and "most popular" - this is a popular choice, and among some other popular films (the excerable "Titanic"?) it is certainly holding it's place with justification.



a fine and fair distinction, but misplaced in this case. It's also a shite movie. Complete and utter wank. Bland, insipid, every other word under that heading from the thesaurus. Trite, obvious, tedious. To be watched only when your brain has been/you wish you brain to be turned to mush.kyser_soze said:Spanglechick's got it - it's a great piece of entertainment - a great movie but not a great film
I know you touched on it in your post, but there are films that are both - there really is no good reason why a film (or, in your words, a 'movie') shouldn't be both. Why are our standards so low? There's thousands of fantastic films everywhere. Giving undue credit to something like Shawshank (even in being kind to it) does nobody any service, we should rather rant and rave about complete genius like The Princess Bride or Dr Strangelove. It's not that Shawshank is bad, it's that it isn't good enough.kyser_soze said:Spanglechick's got it - it's a great piece of entertainment - a great movie but not a great film
top post.Good Intentions said:I know you touched on it in your post, but there are films that are both - there really is no good reason why a film (or, in your words, a 'movie') shouldn't be both. Why are our standards so low? There's thousands of fantastic films everywhere. Giving undue credit to something like Shawshank (even in being kind to it) does nobody any service, we should rather rant and rave about complete genius like The Princess Bride or Dr Strangelove. It's not that Shawshank is bad, it's that it isn't good enough.
belboid said:edit: Shawshank Redemption = Coldplay