Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Shakespeare in Love

Yeh, right :D

What's intriguing is that while I wouldn't be foolish enough to claim any objectivity, you will - "the craft is there to see" etc.

Hypocritical much? :D
No, not at all. Whilst I think you could get a measure of consensus amongst the experts on whether a director is technically competent or not, I wouldn't pretend to have any specialist knowledge on the subject at all. With that in mind, I think I've been pretty careful even here to say that I was impressed with the technical aspects highlighted on the commentary, but I would urge you to borrow a copy of the DVD and watch it yourself, and form your own opinion.

Maybe the extra insight would elevate it in your mind from worst film ever (a, some would say, controversial charge that you haven't attempted to justify..) to, I dunno... 2nd?
 
I got lots of Mr Stoppard's little jokes.

I found these 'jokes' smug, knowing and nauseating. Also when I saw it at the cinema it was clear that many of the people laughing were just doing so cos everyone else wanted to make it look like they 'got' the reference.

A film for middle class wankers. File next to Vetriano Prints, M People, Weekend trips to Ikea and Pashmina Scarves.
 
I found these 'jokes' smug, knowing and nauseating. Also when I saw it at the cinema it was clear that many of the people laughing were just doing so cos everyone else wanted to make it look like they 'got' the reference.
fucking hell... have all films got to be gritty dramas set on council estates now or something?

fwiw, my knowledge of shakespeare extends to what i learned in school, and seeing the occasional play or film adaptation (like most people, i expect) and i got a lot of the references. and yeah, i laughed at some of them too... was that bad of me? :(
 
I love the way all your arguments grind to a halt when confronted by the fact that I've seen / heard the work in question.

Pathetic, really
:confused:

Oh right. You want me to argue with your opinion that American Beauty is... rubbish? Is... the worst film ever? What would be an effective strategy for that, do you think? Refuting someone's opinion.

It's your opinion. You're entitled to it. I find the assertion that it's the worst film ever utterly ridiculous but, until you attempt to justify it, I've nothing further to go on.

Anyway, what I was getting at is: I know you've seen the film. That is clear. However, I don't believe - correct me if I'm wrong - that you've watched it with Mendes' commentary. You know - the thing we've been discussing most of the way along?

So that is what I suggested you should watch. Do you understand now? :)
 
But why on earth would I want to see a man justify a work i think is execrable? What on earth would be the point? Do you think, in taking in this commentary, I might suddenly be convinced that I was wrong all along, and it's actual a great movie? Or simply that despite it being a piece of crap, he's nonetheless a great director?

Well, the first isn't going to happen and the latter is, as I've already explained, irrelevant. I don't care if he can give a good account of himself, I do care about the end result. And the end result is toss.
 
I found these 'jokes' smug, knowing and nauseating. Also when I saw it at the cinema it was clear that many of the people laughing were just doing so cos everyone else wanted to make it look like they 'got' the reference.

So that's got fuck-all to do with the film then. It's all about you.

A film for middle class wankers.

I refer my honourable and learned friend to the great tradition of miners' Shakespeare productions.
 
But why on earth would I want to see a man justify a work i think is execrable? What on earth would be the point? Do you think, in taking in this commentary, I might suddenly be convinced that I was wrong all along, and it's actual a great movie? Or simply that despite it being a piece of crap, he's nonetheless a great director?
No, too wildly overoptimistic. I'd hope for something smaller than that. I'd hope that, watched without prejudice (preh-judice), it might cause you to revise your, frankly, embarrassing pronouncement about it being the worst film ever. A pronouncement which, with your repeated failure to justify it, is looking more and more ridiculous at every turn.
 
I don't need to justify it to anyone, least of all you. I loathe the film, I've given a potted version of why and I certainly can't be bothered to expand on that.

Sorry, must be a crushing disappointment.
 
I don't need to justify it to anyone, least of all you. I loathe the film, I've given a potted version of why and I certainly can't be bothered to expand on that.

Sorry, must be a crushing disappointment.
It is, it is. Since I found the film immensely enjoyable and I'm mystified as to why you.. not merely didn't, but actively loathe it so. It puzzles me deeply and, being imbued like most of the species with a natural curiosity, it hurts to not have a satisfactory answer. Do you, by any chance, have a copy of your review that I could read, that I might pursue the matter further?
least of all you.
I'm honoured with a special place in your disaffections? Why, pray? :)
 
We haven't talked about the acting yet.

What did you think about the standard of the acting?
So many unanswered questions.

ok. You think it's the "worst film ever" - but you're not prepared to say why. :rolleyes:

Like I said to begin with: silly.

thread_hot_lock.gif
 
Don't need to. You find it derivative. Many films are equally unoriginal, so this doesn't justify your pronouncement. Feel free to withdraw it, as I can accept that you simply don't like it. That's no big deal.

(But seriously - I really would like to read the review if possible? No doubt I'll disagree, but I'm not looking for 'ammo'. It just sounds like it'll be fun.)
 
Fuck me, you're a bore. I loathe the film. for the reasons stated, and some others. I have no need or desire to justify that to you. Move on, find somebody else to fail to antagonise.
 
I'm not trying to antagonise you. Like I said, I'm just puzzled by the levels of enmity that you display towards the film (and towards me - but that's by the by :)), and simply asking politely why you hate it so.

But I'll reluctantly leave it there if being asked questions annoys you.
 

Kevin Spacey's acting mainly but also the portrayal of his character, who was made out to be a sort of hero when he was a vile creep.
I don't think it's the worst film ever - there are many many far worse films than American Beauty - but it's certainly a mediocre film and very disappointing considering Alan Ball is the creator of Six Feet Under, which I loved.
 
Christ, I'm bored with this now too.

I can see how Spacey's style might put some off and I'm not even sure what the film's trying to say morally.

Now for God's sake let me out of this thread.
 
Jeff's making me, Clyde. :(

Ironic that you now want out of a debate you pretty much instigated.

Not really. An invisible boredom threshold has been crossed. It's no mystery. I did respond to his points. :rolleyes:

(Half-heartedly with the last breath of a dying man, I must admit... can I go now? :()
 
No he isn't
No he is. I find the vitriol he continually spits my way irresistible (but I say again that, in this instance, that I wasn't out to antagonise, easy and satisfying though that is on the rare occasions I pursue it).

So I suppose we're both to blame.

It's a sort of love really.
 
Back
Top Bottom