i did. i thought it was a smashing movie.But nobody extolled the virtues of Spice World.

i quite liked shakespeare in love too, mind...
i did. i thought it was a smashing movie.But nobody extolled the virtues of Spice World.

No, not at all. Whilst I think you could get a measure of consensus amongst the experts on whether a director is technically competent or not, I wouldn't pretend to have any specialist knowledge on the subject at all. With that in mind, I think I've been pretty careful even here to say that I was impressed with the technical aspects highlighted on the commentary, but I would urge you to borrow a copy of the DVD and watch it yourself, and form your own opinion.Yeh, right
What's intriguing is that while I wouldn't be foolish enough to claim any objectivity, you will - "the craft is there to see" etc.
Hypocritical much?![]()
I would urge you to borrow a copy of the DVD and watch it yourself, and form your own opinion.

I got lots of Mr Stoppard's little jokes.
Oh, it's clear that you've seen the film. What were we talking about again?I watched it at the cinema on release and reviewed it too. I've no need to revisit it, thanks![]()

Oh, it's clear that you've seen the film. What were we talking about again?![]()
fucking hell... have all films got to be gritty dramas set on council estates now or something?I found these 'jokes' smug, knowing and nauseating. Also when I saw it at the cinema it was clear that many of the people laughing were just doing so cos everyone else wanted to make it look like they 'got' the reference.

I love the way all your arguments grind to a halt when confronted by the fact that I've seen / heard the work in question.
Pathetic, really


I found these 'jokes' smug, knowing and nauseating. Also when I saw it at the cinema it was clear that many of the people laughing were just doing so cos everyone else wanted to make it look like they 'got' the reference.
A film for middle class wankers.
No, too wildly overoptimistic. I'd hope for something smaller than that. I'd hope that, watched without prejudice (preh-judice), it might cause you to revise your, frankly, embarrassing pronouncement about it being the worst film ever. A pronouncement which, with your repeated failure to justify it, is looking more and more ridiculous at every turn.But why on earth would I want to see a man justify a work i think is execrable? What on earth would be the point? Do you think, in taking in this commentary, I might suddenly be convinced that I was wrong all along, and it's actual a great movie? Or simply that despite it being a piece of crap, he's nonetheless a great director?
It is, it is. Since I found the film immensely enjoyable and I'm mystified as to why you.. not merely didn't, but actively loathe it so. It puzzles me deeply and, being imbued like most of the species with a natural curiosity, it hurts to not have a satisfactory answer. Do you, by any chance, have a copy of your review that I could read, that I might pursue the matter further?I don't need to justify it to anyone, least of all you. I loathe the film, I've given a potted version of why and I certainly can't be bothered to expand on that.
Sorry, must be a crushing disappointment.
I'm honoured with a special place in your disaffections? Why, pray?least of all you.

So many unanswered questions.We haven't talked about the acting yet.
What did you think about the standard of the acting?

), and simply asking politely why you hate it so....
why?

Ironic that you now want out of a debate you pretty much instigated.

)Jeff's making me, Clyde.![]()
No he is. I find the vitriol he continually spits my way irresistible (but I say again that, in this instance, that I wasn't out to antagonise, easy and satisfying though that is on the rare occasions I pursue it).No he isn't