Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Shakespear for beginners

kyser_soze said:
This would be the one accused of rampant anti-semitism and generally panned for De Niro's Shylock?

Hey, there's some bits in Othello which could be regarded as pretty off to modern sensibilities, as well as the tradition associated with it of actors blacking up.
 
spanglechick said:
Not an interpretation I've come across before in my pretty extensive Shakespeare studies...

"Making it clear that..." was maybe too definite."Presenting the interpretation that..."

Must do some work, mustn't re-read the play... seem to recall that there is a suggestion in the text that nurse may have offered Juliet a tincture to rid her of a... troublesome female issue...
 
kyser_soze said:
This would be the one accused of rampant anti-semitism and generally panned for De Niro's Shylock?

Yes, but it is wrongly accused. The play has long been regarded as problematic and has been a source for anti-semitic characature.

Firstly the film opens with scenes designed to put the anti-semitic atmosphere of the time in context. Secondly, it is a source of major dispute as to whether the play itself is anti-semitic (the accusations that the film is is simply based on that - clearly from the added opening scenes the film makers are not). Shakespeare puts into Shylock's mouth the oft quoted anti-racist statement 'if you cut me do I not bleed?' Only if we require victims of racism to themselves be faltless paragons of virtue would we see the play as anti-semitic. Mike Rosen's book takes on the question as to whether the plas is anti-semitic and concludes that it is not (this is not a universally held view, though).

See it and make up your own mind.
 
Nemo said:
Hey, there's some bits in Othello which could be regarded as pretty off to modern sensibilities, as well as the tradition associated with it of actors blacking up.

That 'tradition' arises purely because black actors have not been used to play the lead. This is not something you would expect to see today. Is it racist or anti-racist? Given that Othello is the lead character, given that he is the tragic hero, given that he is wronged and driven mad by jealousy stirred up by irrational hatred of him, the play can be seen as anti-racist.

In the film version Othello is played by Denzil Washington. In every stage production I have seen Othello is played by a black actor.
 
laptop said:
"Making it clear that..." was maybe too definite."Presenting the interpretation that..."

Must do some work, mustn't re-read the play... seem to recall that there is a suggestion in the text that nurse may have offered Juliet a tincture to rid her of a... troublesome female issue...
ahh, now this I can go with - one of the joys of shakespeare is what you can make it mean.
 
kyser_soze said:
there's a pretty decent Dick III version updated to WWII era armies and stuff which is quite watchable...

THat's the Ian McKellan one to which I refer.

It's supposed to be excellent.
 
30-4.jpg


MACBETH! :mad:
 
If you can find it being performed anywhere, Measure for Measure is a good one. The themes about hypocracy in power and corruption are still very relevent. Plus I also remember that one as being a bit dirty. :D
 
Groucho said:
That 'tradition' arises purely because black actors have not been used to play the lead. This is not something you would expect to see today. Is it racist or anti-racist? Given that Othello is the lead character, given that he is the tragic hero, given that he is wronged and driven mad by jealousy stirred up by irrational hatred of him, the play can be seen as anti-racist.

In the film version Othello is played by Denzil Washington. In every stage production I have seen Othello is played by a black actor.

I've seen Othello played by a blacked up white man (at least I presume that's what he was), or at least one who had been made to look distinctly swarthy.

Agent Sparrow said:
If you can find it being performed anywhere, Measure for Measure is a good one. The themes about hypocracy in power and corruption are still very relevent. Plus I also remember that one as being a bit dirty.

Yep, Merasure for Measure is good, but possibly not one to go for in the first instance.
 
spanglechick said:
I mentioned it too - k_s is to important to read the whole thread, doncha know... :p ;)

I have people to read threads for me, doncha know :p

It's not a bad version, altho the wheels come off the WW2/WW1 imagery toward the end and it looses it's way - it certainly didn't contain the bloody finish I was hoping for and it felt a bit flimsy...IMO of course...
 
kyser_soze said:
I have people to read threads for me, doncha know :p

It's not a bad version, altho the wheels come off the WW2/WW1 imagery toward the end and it looses it's way - it certainly didn't contain the bloody finish I was hoping for and it felt a bit flimsy...IMO of course...
ahhh, but the acting's shit hot.

btw - sack your people, they're shite
 
Hamlet and King Lear are the plays.

Hamlet is the Lion King, with a bad ending, because Hamlet can neer make up his mind what to do, and when he acts in the end, it's too late, and everyone dies. Or strictly, the Lion King is Hamlet, disneyfied.

King Lear is even worse. Have a good leer at a king in trouble, loses his kingdom and goes mad.

When you understand who Hamlet is, or represents, then you understand also why the most famous line in it is so famous.

I only really got it when I was at Glastonbury in 1999, I came across this little tent selling cloths and so on from the far east,

It had a caption on a card outside, the name of the shop, kind of,

"To be or not to be, that is the question, artworks for the 21st century, or The scrap shop? "

And I looked at the cloths, and the artistry in them went on forever, honestly.

Oh, and they're good to read as well as see, btw., those two are.
 
mmm - other than Kurasowa's Ran, are there any decent film adaptations of Lear? It's a fab play and quite an easy entry point to the canon, but I can't think of a decent film of it...
 
Those *are* the tragedies, ther's only 4 of 'em. Well, at least there were on the A-level course I sat...

Histories, fantasies, tragedies
 
kyser_soze said:
Those *are* the tragedies, ther's only 4 of 'em. Well, at least there were on the A-level course I sat...

Histories, fantasies, tragedies
wha??

Romeo and Juliet
Anthony and Cleopatra
Julius Caesar
Titus Andronicus
Corialanus
Timon of Athens*

*to be fair, I had to look that one up
Tragedies, Histories, Comedies (including later plays / problem plays - Winter's Tale, Measure for Measure, Tempest...)

eta - JC - i missed the fecker out
 
Surely the tragedies are the stories of a single hero with a tragic flaw, which rules out R&J...

Soz - I wuz tort that there are only 4 tragedies.
 
kyser_soze said:
Those *are* the tragedies, ther's only 4 of 'em. Well, at least there were on the A-level course I sat...

Histories, fantasies, tragedies

What about the comedies? :confused:

Oh, and the tragedies you missed out?

Romeo and Juliet
Titus Andronicus
Julius Caesar
Timon of Athens
Antony and Cleopatra
Coriolanus
??????????

Not to mention other tragicomedies such as The Winter's Tale, Merchant of Venice etc.

PS Julius Caesar and Antony and Cleopatra are not classed as histories

Edit: Beaten to it. Doh! Well done Spanglechick! :)
 
kyser_soze said:
Surely the tragedies are the stories of a single hero with a tragic flaw, which rules out R&J...

Soz - I wuz tort that there are only 4 tragedies.
nope that's, iirc - the Platonic definition of tragedy (harmartia and all that).

But at anyrate it could be argued that Othello has two flawed protagonists too. Or that Juliet is subserviant to Romeo's tragic path. (if he hadn't gone to the ball, she'd have lived happily ever after with paris etc) Regardless, they're all the tragedies. trust me ;)
 
kyser_soze said:
Soz - I wuz tort that there are only 4 tragedies.

I was taught that Jupiter had only 10 moons. Within just two years it was established there were 12. 14 now I believe. Teachers, eh?! What do they know?
 
kyser_soze said:
Surely the tragedies are the stories of a single hero with a tragic flaw, which rules out R&J...

Soz - I wuz tort that there are only 4 tragedies.

You were tort wrong then! :p :cool:
 
kyser_soze said:
Those *are* the tragedies, ther's only 4 of 'em. Well, at least there were on the A-level course I sat...

Jesus Kyser, where did you go to school? And, more worryingly, you didn't *pass* your A level did you?
 
Back
Top Bottom