I bow to thee my worthy master!
![]()
Just realised that you may take this literally and misclaim another victory.
What it actually means is that you're wrong, 100%, utterly, totally, wrong.
With bells on!

Too late-you've posted it now and its out in the open. I win....with bells on![]()
Then you're either lying or stupid.
You are one of the most biased posters in this forum. You allow Nino free reign to chase Rachamim all over the place but chastise me for doing nothing different to him.
Ah, I've found another example of your intentions on this forum. I "chase Rachamim all over the place"? How laughable.
A more intelligent poster than yourself would rebut his claims with argument. You are unable to do this so you resort to "liar, liar" and "links, links".
I've read enough of the threads to understand why Rachamim exercises people so much. Some of his views are regarded as extreme. However due to either extreme anger or lack of intelligence some correspondents are unable to offer meaningful rebuttal and resort to shouts for "proof" which if supplied would be dismissed as "biased".
Frankly I'm dissapointed that you were one of the many posters who consistently asked Tobyjug for proof of his claims (and rightly so) but somehow when the exact same thing occurs in this forum its somehow different?
Spymaster said:He could easily provide links supporting most of his assertions. It's just that those links would be from sources that some posters would find unacceptable, that's pointless and boring.
Spymaster said:Take him on at another level, offer a rebuttal.
As I said, I disagree with a lot of Rach's posts. I just think that if you can't challenge them intelligently, you shouldn't bother at all.
I'm glad you brought that up because it was the whole Tobyjug debacle that made me realise that the entire "proof, proof" thing is bollocks.
See, you (and others sadly) seem to think that a hyperlink to a page proves something. It does not
As I said, I disagree with a lot of Rach's posts. I just think that if you can't challenge them intelligently, you shouldn't bother at all.
What? Are you suggesting that you challenge him "intelligently"? Don't make me laugh, all you do is come here to snipe at Grandma and me.
All I've done to you Nino is precisely what you've done to Rachamim for the last two years. Annoying and pointless isn't it.
Anyway I'm bored with making you look foolish so how about you just put me on ignore as you've already promised on 3 threads? I'm done with you.
Or were you lying about doing that too?
Grandma: I "promised" links because you DEMANDED THEM AFTER CURSING ME and I stupidly thought it would stop the nonsense and lead to a more relaxed atmosphere. Luckily circumstances allowed me to see how fruitless THAT effort would be. Political discourse is going to be heated in the best of times I think and that is why I take great pains not to let myself use expletives and such. I would hope that this would have also contributed to a more congenial atmosphere, but alas. Shame that the mods have to do what they do I think.
Stop it now Granny, FFS.
Nah mate, I'm not a mod but this is silly.
Rach's posts on the "rubber bullet" thread are full of moral "chinks". You're doing well there, why do this?
