Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Settlers filmed beating Palestinians with baseball bats

Just realised that you may take this literally and misclaim another victory.

What it actually means is that you're wrong, 100%, utterly, totally, wrong.

With bells on!


Too late-you've posted it now and its out in the open. I win....with bells on :p
 
Too late-you've posted it now and its out in the open. I win....with bells on :p

Oh that makes sense. Ok then.

crush.gif
 
Then you're either lying or stupid.

You are one of the most biased posters in this forum. You allow Nino free reign to chase Rachamim all over the place but chastise me for doing nothing different to him.

Ah, I've found another example of your intentions on this forum. I "chase Rachamim all over the place"? How laughable. Praytell, what are you doing...aside from following me around? You haven't spent much time on this forum, yet you think you know what's happening.

All you've done is suck up to R18 and make a series of baseless accusations
 
Ah, I've found another example of your intentions on this forum. I "chase Rachamim all over the place"? How laughable.

You disagree?

Do you have some kind of memory retention problem which causes you to instantly forget your own posts?

Are you seriously suggesting to posters that you do not follow Rachamim around and post behind just about every post he contributes? Didn't you even do some internet research on the man and his businesses? You delusional, obssessive fruitcake.

You're a joke kid.

Regarding your "sucking up" comment; I'll happily admit that I find Rachamim's postings interesting. Regardless of whether I agree or disagree with him, he is a clearly intelligent, eloquent individual. You and one or two others are (relatively speaking of course) unintelligent, with only the aim of shouting him down and destroying debate by constant shouts of "liar, liar" and demands for links.

A more intelligent poster than yourself would rebut his claims with argument. You are unable to do this so you resort to "liar, liar" and "links, links".
 
A more intelligent poster than yourself would rebut his claims with argument. You are unable to do this so you resort to "liar, liar" and "links, links".

Equally a more intelligent poster would take time to read some of the debates that have taken in place in this forum with Rach. It would appear that you and others seem unable to do this and resort to claims of bullying of people that don't 'tow the line' or sticking facile labels like 'Zionist are scumbags' on forum users who object to the behaviour of Israel.
 
I've read enough of the threads to understand why Rachamim exercises people so much. Some of his views are regarded as extreme. However due to either extreme anger or lack of intelligence some correspondents are unable to offer meaningful rebuttal and resort to shouts for "proof" which if supplied would be dismissed as "biased".

I would suggest that you read some of the exchanges between Tangentlama and Rachamim for some frank but open exchanges that actually give those of us interested in the situation something to think about and research; rather than just jumping in with "liar, liar pants on fire".
 
I've read enough of the threads to understand why Rachamim exercises people so much. Some of his views are regarded as extreme. However due to either extreme anger or lack of intelligence some correspondents are unable to offer meaningful rebuttal and resort to shouts for "proof" which if supplied would be dismissed as "biased".

Your perception is so way off the mark its laughable.

Frankly I'm dissapointed that you were one of the many posters who consistently asked Tobyjug for proof of his claims (and rightly so) but somehow when the exact same thing occurs in this forum its somehow different?

Rach has a track record for making claims and not backing them up (even after promising to back up his many claims). To suggest that somehow the debate is weaker because people are asking him for proof suggests to me that your position is the weak one not the posters asking for proof.
 
Frankly I'm dissapointed that you were one of the many posters who consistently asked Tobyjug for proof of his claims (and rightly so) but somehow when the exact same thing occurs in this forum its somehow different?

I'm glad you brought that up because it was the whole Tobyjug debacle that made me realise that the entire "proof, proof" thing is bollocks. You may recall that I also initiated a thread, apologising to Tobyjug for my part in his hounding and desisted from there on. Besides, Tobes would often state that black is white whereas Rachamim is more likely to state that he holds an opinion which others find offensive and be asked to prove a position rather than an individual fact.

He could easily provide links supporting most of his assertions. It's just that those links would be from sources that some posters would find unacceptable, that's pointless and boring. Take him on at another level, offer a rebuttal.

As I said, I disagree with a lot of Rach's posts. I just think that if you can't challenge them intelligently, you shouldn't bother at all.
 
Spymaster said:
He could easily provide links supporting most of his assertions. It's just that those links would be from sources that some posters would find unacceptable, that's pointless and boring.

This is a new excuse which I'm sure Rach would be more than happy to use next time. Rach hardly ever produces links full stop and not because people will question the source-its more likely that he can't produce them. If you'd even bothered to read his posts (which you claim you have but once again I voice my serious doubts about your claim) you'd know this.


Spymaster said:
Take him on at another level, offer a rebuttal.

As I said, I disagree with a lot of Rach's posts. I just think that if you can't challenge them intelligently, you shouldn't bother at all.

Again this is pure nonsense. Try engaging with him yourself-failing that....trawl through his posts. Either you're being deliberately obtuse, lying or totally blind mate.

I'm glad you brought that up because it was the whole Tobyjug debacle that made me realise that the entire "proof, proof" thing is bollocks.

So now you're a reformed character. Well done. Now sit down and engage with Rach instead of wasting time yet again talking about him or getting me to engage on the subject of Rach.
 
The thing is Grandma that I have stated that in many posts. I often offer that I could provide hyperlinks to IDF, MFA, or Kahanist sites but in the end, to me, it is absolutely worthless. See, you (and others sadly) seem to think that a hyperlink to a page proves something. It does not. You can find webpages claiming G.W. Bush is an alien if you look moderately. So what? I would much rather deal with actual facts but this seems to escape you (and of course others).


As for not being able to produce links, as I said, one can find anything on the ent. that is not an issue. I much rather have people truly research a subject and learn.
 
See, you (and others sadly) seem to think that a hyperlink to a page proves something. It does not

What a ludicrous position to take. First you promise links; make excuses as to why you can't provide them; flounce from the boards in the hope posters will forget to ask for them and finally you make up ad homs to deflect from providing them. Now (as if all that wasn't enough) you choose to rubbish links as not proving anything.

Yes links are so not important.....yet even you ask for them.

Make your mind up Rach-you're all over the place with your piss weak excuses.
 
As I said, I disagree with a lot of Rach's posts. I just think that if you can't challenge them intelligently, you shouldn't bother at all.

What? Are you suggesting that you challenge him "intelligently"? Don't make me laugh, all you do is come here to snipe at Grandma and me.
 
What? Are you suggesting that you challenge him "intelligently"? Don't make me laugh, all you do is come here to snipe at Grandma and me.

All I've done to you Nino is precisely what you've done to Rachamim for the last two years. Annoying and pointless isn't it.

Anyway I'm bored with making you look foolish so how about you just put me on ignore as you've already promised on 3 threads? I'm done with you.

Or were you lying about doing that too?
 
All I've done to you Nino is precisely what you've done to Rachamim for the last two years. Annoying and pointless isn't it.

Anyway I'm bored with making you look foolish so how about you just put me on ignore as you've already promised on 3 threads? I'm done with you.

Or were you lying about doing that too?

Bullshit. You hadn't spent any time on this forum until a few weeks ago, so don't pretend that you're familiar with what's happening here.

Goodbye, chump.
 
Right. The next little personal dig dished out here earns the poster a one day ban. No exceptions.

Continue at your peril.
 
Grandma: I "promised" links because you DEMANDED THEM AFTER CURSING ME and I stupidly thought it would stop the nonsense and lead to a more relaxed atmosphere. Luckily circumstances allowed me to see how fruitless THAT effort would be. Political discourse is going to be heated in the best of times I think and that is why I take great pains not to let myself use expletives and such. I would hope that this would have also contributed to a more congenial atmosphere, but alas. Shame that the mods have to do what they do I think.
 
Grandma: I "promised" links because you DEMANDED THEM AFTER CURSING ME and I stupidly thought it would stop the nonsense and lead to a more relaxed atmosphere. Luckily circumstances allowed me to see how fruitless THAT effort would be. Political discourse is going to be heated in the best of times I think and that is why I take great pains not to let myself use expletives and such. I would hope that this would have also contributed to a more congenial atmosphere, but alas. Shame that the mods have to do what they do I think.

Lies and more lies.
 
Nah mate, I'm not a mod but this is silly.

Rach's posts on the "rubber bullet" thread are full of moral "chinks". You're doing well there, why do this?
 
Nah mate, I'm not a mod but this is silly.

Rach's posts on the "rubber bullet" thread are full of moral "chinks". You're doing well there, why do this?

If you think I'm going to sit there and say nothing when he is blatantly lying you're seriously barking up the wrong tree.
 
Yes! Crusader for truth! I kneel before thouse noblest presence and beg your indulgence! Now can we get back to the real worl and a forum without nonsense?
 
Conveniently for Rach (unless he was making it up) he's just going away for a few days. Perfectly timed, if nothing else :)
 
Back
Top Bottom