Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Serious question to the political left regarding terrorists

Blagsta said:
Do you think these suicide bombers actually think in that manner?

no. Which is surely the point. We are all the enemy. From the pattern that seems to be emerging there is no tactical plan that seeks to garner support from 'outside' sources (thus trying to gain sympathy or at least some kind of political understanding).

Like i say, if they'd have targeted gleneagles, wouldn't we be jumping for joy?
 
Maybe I should ask the questions diferently.

What are the terrorists end goals? Change our way of life? Are they attacks against our political establishment? are they against our economic power? etc

Why do you think they are using the means they are using to reach their ends?

Do you think their means will be effective long term?
 
Christian Man said:
I definitely disagree, economies are not run on buildings. You can take away all our skyscrapers and we'll still find a way to go to work just as Londoners will ride their bike to work if they have to. Even after 9/11 our economy just paused for a bit. Economies run on oil.


sorry i dont think i explained myself very well.

terrorists arent going to be able to realistically cripple the economy so its better to destroy symbolic places and cause as much disruption as possible
 
soluble duck said:
sorry i dont think i explained myself very well.

terrorists arent going to be able to realistically cripple the economy so its better to destroy symbolic places and cause as much disruption as possible

I see what you are saying and partially agree but if terrorists get one oil choke point then that food which was supposed to be delivered to your grocery store may not make it without gas. That would definitely hinder us in all aspects.
 
Christian Man said:
Maybe I should ask the questions diferently.

What are the terrorists end goals? Change our way of life? Are they attacks against our political establishment? are they against our economic power? etc

Why do you think they are using the means they are using to reach their ends?

Do you think their means will be effective long term?

I'll go first.

I think their end goals are to dominate our way of life, put our political establishment on the run, and bring down our economic power. I think they want superiority not justice.

I think they are using these means because it may accomplish all of these.

Yes
 
Christian Man said:
I see what you are saying and partially agree but if terrorists get one oil choke point then that food which was supposed to be delivered to your grocery store may not make it without gas. That would definitely hinder us in all aspects.
but don't the yankee imperialists import much of their oil pre-refined?
 
Christian Man said:
I see what you are saying and partially agree but if terrorists get one oil choke point then that food which was supposed to be delivered to your grocery store may not make it without gas. That would definitely hinder us in all aspects.

But that's long term impact...they want to have an instant effect, cause as much fear and panic as possible.
 
scumbalina said:
But that's long term impact...they want to have an instant effect, cause as much fear and panic as possible.

So you're saying they just don't think long term? I think individually you may be right, some of these terrorists may have short term anger and motives but I think the "movement" as a whole has long term goals.
 
scumbalina said:
I am a bit confused as to why this thread is addressed to the political left TBH? :confused:

Because I consider myself polically right (no pun intended) :P and I tended to think terrorists were mostly after war mongering Texan raised right wing Republicans, not your average Londoner on the subway or tourist from any country on a bus.
 
Christian Man said:
Because I consider myself polically right (no pun intended) :P and I always thought terrorists were mostly after war mongering Texan raised right wing Republicans, not your average Londoner on the subway or tourist from any country on a bus.


But I think anyone can have an opinion on that - being left wing doesn't give you any more insight does it?
 
scumbalina said:
But I think anyone can have an opinion on that - being left wing doesn't give you any more insight does it?

I have no clue, I'm just stirring up conversation for ideas, and yes everyone I'm sure has their opinions both left and right and unpolitical.
 
Christian Man said:
Because I consider myself polically right (no pun intended) :P and I always thought terrorists were mostly after war mongering Texan raised right wing Republicans, not your average Londoner on the subway or tourist from any country on a bus.


i think this point has already been made, so sorry

but I really don't think a terrorist differentiates between political ideologies among the population, its America the land of evil etc etc etc
 
soluble duck said:
i think this point has already been made, so sorry

but I really don't think a terrorist differentiates between political ideologies among the population, its America the land of evil etc etc etc

So basically stereotyping and over-generalizing, yes I definitely think thats a big part of the problem actually.

I was thinking that modern day Islam was like European Christianity back in the "dark ages" period, half pagan, half christian, very backward and superstitious and mostly full of fear of the new and unknown. imo

Anyway I have to get some errands done I may be back later tonight (US time)
 
montevideo said:
We are all the enemy. QUOTE]

I think there's a lot in that. I don't think fanaticism/fundamentalism, whatever banner it marches under, sees details, it just sees everything in black and white.

I haven't read all this thread but it seems obvious why the bombers targeted London, it's the capital. Big population etc. If you want to blow something up and get maximum impact, then it seems a far more obvious choice than a smaller place. Grim, but seems logical enough.
 
Christian Man said:
Because I consider myself polically right (no pun intended) :P and I tended to think terrorists were mostly after war mongering Texan raised right wing Republicans, not your average Londoner on the subway or tourist from any country on a bus.


Yeah, but the bombing is about making a statement, isn't it? And where better to do that than what is seen as the centre of somewhere. More publicity and reaction in that, surely. The actual identities people messed up in it are pretty much immaterial to the bombers. It's surely more of a strike against the coutry rather than individual people
 
Just to point out...the North is not a right wing area, and the BNP don't really have that much of a presence, it's just they're a bit more active there than some other places. England isn't really as politically divided as the U.S, at least not too the same extent.
Is that a general view in the US? :eek:
 
Back
Top Bottom