I just provide a free, popular forum where you can talk about - and publicise - issues that are important to you, but unless I personally get involved with every issue that ticks your boxes, I'm to blame for Alex Jones?Yes it does. The utter fucking silence of 'progressive's like you on the removal of those with LD/MH from society (or indeed, from life) is background to this. And that cause is able to be exploited to the max by cunts like Alex Jones, because 'progressives' couldn't give a shit.
Maybe if lefties actually gave a shit about parents such as the Evan's, it wouldn't be so easy for Alex Jones et all to exploit their suffering
That's what I thought but assumed I had misunderstood or the matter was up for debate. I really can't think of any other reason no to let the parents take him to italy if they want.The kid's apparently brain dead, he's not suffering anything.
I just provide a free, popular forum where you can talk about - and publicise - issues that are important to you, but unless I personally get involved with every issue that ticks your boxes, I'm to blame for Alex Jones?
Jesus wept.
Yes it does. The utter fucking silence of 'progressive's like you on the removal of those with LD/MH from society (or indeed, from life) is background to this. And that cause is able to be exploited to the max by cunts like Alex Jones, because 'progressives' couldn't give a shit.
Maybe if lefties actually gave a shit about parents such as the Evan's, it wouldn't be so easy for Alex Jones et all to exploit their suffering
experts pah
We were euthanizing down syndrome children one or two generations ago and that was expert opinion
how about this near miss
'Miracle' Baby Wakes From Coma As Doctors Prepare To Turn Off Life Support
Why not let the kid go somewhere else?
You attacked me because I'm apparently some sort of figurehead for what you define as "progressives" and "lefties."And that's exactly what I just said, of course.
I am very grateful for a space and discussion forum to come share and vent onI just provide a free, popular forum where you can talk about - and publicise - issues that are important to you, but unless I personally get involved with every issue that ticks your boxes, I'm to blame for Alex Jones?
Jesus wept.
I realise this is a subject with personal resonance for you, but I'm not sure attacking anyone here over it is helpful or appropriate.
What do you think "progressives" or whoever should be doing about this case which might demonstrate their "giving a shit" and prevent Alex Jones et al from exploiting the suffering of the Evans parents and others like them?
what bad things will happen if he is transfered to rome and has his palliative care prolonged in a hospital with connections to the vatican?There's no hope of recovery, the transfer to the hospital in Rome, which has connections with the Vatican, would only result in his palliative care continuing.
Why do you think I represent 'leftie' politics? Why even include me in your post?The comment wasn't an attack on Ed (I thought my post was clear on that), but on the leftie politics, which sneers at certain unfashionable groups (for their struggles, and their desperate attempts to make sense of, and liberate themselves from, such struggles); and then can't understand why scum like Scientology/Conspiraloons have such influence on those groups.
Why do you think I represent 'leftie' politics? Why even include me in your post?
And as for attacking the likes of Scientology and Alex Jones, I think I've certainly played a bigger part than some and this board has had some influence in dismantling and ridiculing some of the bonkers theories emanating from conspiracy nuts.
The parents are fucking idiots, sorry.
No, I was directly comparing the two specific medical cases.I was responding to your glib post that the killing of kids with LD 'has nothing to do with this'. Can we focus on the social/poilital context of families like those of the Evans', rather than what might have been a poorly worded post of mine earlier on?
Is that how NHS funding works?Meanwhile somewhere today a child who could have been saved will die, cos the NHS is spunking money on keeping alive a baby that is already brain dead!
Meanwhile somewhere today a child who could have been saved will die, cos the NHS is spunking money on keeping alive a baby that is already brain dead!
Meanwhile somewhere today a child who could have been saved will die, cos the NHS is spunking money on keeping alive a baby that is already brain dead!
Meanwhile somewhere today a child who could have been saved will die, cos the NHS is spunking money on keeping alive a baby that is already brain dead!
Potentially sets a dangerous precedent whereby anyone can transfer a patient out as soon as they're unhappy with a decision? Thus the principle of duty of care based expert decision making is compromised by carers' nuclear option of 'I'm going elsewhere'.what bad things will happen if he is transfered to rome and has his palliative care prolonged in a hospital with connections to the vatican?
I’m sure I read a while back that the medical team couldn’t be sure he wasn’t feeling pain but I can’t remember where.I think you probably need to be brain-alive to feel anything at all. I can't say I understand the science though, maybe he's actually suffering in there - it doesn't sound like it though.
TBH I don't have very strong feelings on this, other than a vague uneasiness about the whole thing. Just feels like The wrong kind of people doing the wrong protest.
The real blame for that is the cunting fucking Tory scumbags and the Blairite shitbags who have handed over chunks of the precious NHS to profiteering filth.I doubt it.
This is the most detailed description that I've managed to come across.what bad things will happen if he is transfered to rome and has his palliative care prolonged in a hospital with connections to the vatican?
No mention of pain or suffering.Mr Justice Hayden said the details of provisions for the final stage of Alfie Evans’s life could not be made public.
.....
The judge said details of that plan could not be revealed because Alfie was entitled to privacy at the end of his life.
Is this not already the case? Once my child is in the care of the NHS I can't choose to take him somewhere else if I disagree with their care or diagnoses?Potentially sets a dangerous precedent whereby anyone can transfer a patient out as soon as they're unhappy with a decision?
Christ, this thread's really brought out some wankers. Mind you, you were in favour of NHS cutbacks anyway aren't you.Meanwhile somewhere today a child who could have been saved will die, cos the NHS is spunking money on keeping alive a baby that is already brain dead!
And paying a paper chaser administrator 250,000 pounds a year (whilst incidentally they may be suspended, sick gardening leave whatever) these are the cunts that drain the system not the sickMeanwhile somewhere today a child who could have been saved will die, cos the NHS is spunking money on keeping alive a baby that is already brain dead!
Barring certain legal provisions, anyone deemed to have capacity can do whatever they want with regards to care.Potentially sets a dangerous precedent whereby anyone can transfer a patient out as soon as they're unhappy with a decision? Thus the principle of duty of care based expert decision making is compromised by carers' nuclear option of 'I'm going elsewhere'.
Not necessarily, no. Lots of cases about this in recent years. I don't have anything beyond layman's info though.Is this not already the case? Once my child is in the care of the NHS I can't choose to take him somewhere else if I disagree with their care or diagnoses?