Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Saudi paedo to be beheaded & crucified!

Don't really see the point in crucifying someone after they've been beheaded?

Glad it isn't just me then that thought this. On closer inspection of the thread though it appears to be more of a warning type 'display' of the beheaded body than a cruxifiction.
 
Some deterrent - "We'll kill you quickly and painlessly, and then your corpse is going to have a really, really bad time!" I thought the Saudis were meant to be experts in this kind of thing.
 
I don't give a fuck about this guy if he's guitly, but its Saudi Arabia ffs.

Going by the shit I've heard about SA there are literally thousands more like him out there and getting away with it and a lot of these are members of the religious establishement.

This, seriously.

The main thing that gets me about Saudi Arabia is not just are they horrible fucking barbarians but it's a total land of hypocrisy. If anyone remotely important did this, they would most likely get away with it. It would be hushed up pretty fast... in fact there's probably some lovely prince somewhere who gets all whisky'd up and goes for a nice rape-wander without anyone giving two camel shits.

Aye anyway i don't believe in people getting killed by the state, even child rapists, so it's foooooked up anyway. Paid for by lovely Western money too :) :facepalm:
 
I don't believe there is any state using electrocution. Nebraska was the last state to use electrocution and it switched last year. They almost had the votes to end the death penalty this year too. I think they were short two votes.

Nebraska was the last state to have electrocution as its sole method of execution, but other states do keep Old Sparky as a backup method in case lethal injection is ever declared unconstitutional.

The supreme irony about both electrocution and lethal injection, given the considerable numbers of botched executions by both methods, is that they were both pitched as being more humane than their predecessors.
 
Isn't paedophilia a recognised mental illness, at least in the UK?

Executing a mentally ill man is a bit over the top, but I suppose it is a normal, knee-jerk reaction to a story such as this.
NB: my post was a line from the Life of Brian.
 
Fuck me. What century are they in?


Muhammad Basheer al-Ramaly, 22, left his youngest victim, aged three, stranded in the desert to die.

This one. Maybe the UK could join their club and kill a few bastards like him, leaving the bodies to the crows as an example to other cunts that would do the same. :)
 
This one. Maybe the UK could join their club and kill a few bastards like him, leaving the bodies to the crows as an example to other cunts that would do the same. :)

Yeah, that kind of thing's always worked in the past.
 
Paedophilia is no more a mental illness than homosexuality.

He wasn't punished for that, though.
 
Paedophilia is no more a mental illness than homosexuality.

He wasn't punished for that, though.

It's not mentally abnormal to be sexually attracted to physically underdeveloped people(ie children) who don't have the mental maturity to reciprocate the attraction?
 
It's not mentally abnormal to be sexually attracted to physically underdeveloped people(ie children) who don't have the mental maturity to reciprocate the attraction?

Deviancy isn't mental illness. They're typically normal, healthy men. Paedophiles don't show any signs of mental illness. In fact, it's necessary to question the artificial category itself, especially since it seems to have been created to legitimize child abuse.
 
You know when people say that a country has been totally unspoilt by modern development and is a really different/exotic place to visit, how come they never mean Saudi Arabia?
 
Deviancy isn't mental illness. They're typically normal, healthy men. Paedophiles don't show any signs of mental illness. In fact, it's necessary to question the artificial category itself, especially since it seems to have been created to legitimize child abuse.

I think you'll find that pedophilia was created as a category of mental illness to explain child abuse. Not legitimize it.
 
ICD 10 is a peado conspiracy?

It wasn't invented by the WHO. Mental illness classification (which varies greatly) is a tool of social policy in the first place (just because they say so, it must be true :rolleyes:). It's treated as a mental illness because that narrows the focus of the problem. It's not a conspiracy per se, it's just the result of a social bias whose logic ends up being to hide the wider problem, to protect and apologise for child abuse.

We also have other things like NPD, that are also only formally recognised as a mental illness, whereas it isn't recognisable as one, and there's no treatment.
 
Humans are social animals and have progressed to the state we're in largely down to our ability to learn from each other's experiences, rather than having to experience each lesson ourselves. This demands that we be capable of putting ourselves in the place of another. This ability is called empathy. Empathy is at the core of what makes us human.

Failure to empathise is the result of a mental abnormality. This may be permanent or temporary, and to a lesser or greater degree. At the shorter and lower end of the scale it may be attributable to tiredness, stress/adreneline, or drugs, for instance. At the other end of the scale mental illness/congenital abnormality is the only rational explanation.

Not the medical professions' official view, but it is mine.

And that places paedophilia very squarely under 'mental health', imo.
 
People who can't empathise are irredeemable. They've lost their humanity. They're not ill, and they can't be 'cured'.

It doesn't stop them being presidents or billionaires, so I can't see how.
 
Back
Top Bottom