
Dr. Furface said:I haven't heard her tune but the lyrics look shit and it seems she's been hyped to the hilt, but I'll say one thing for her - she's dead right that she missed a damn good time in '77!
Groucho said:It is quite dreadful, but I wondered if in a treacley gooey kind of way it might connect with a certain feeling some young people have that today's yoof don't have their Summer of Love or Punk rock rebellion.
pinkychukkles said:Actually, having lyrics that don't make any sense or contradict each other hasn't been a barrier to many other artists, like errr, Oasis for example.

pinkychukkles said:Just read this article in the Guardian about the manufactured PR surrounding this single (no surprise there) and it just made my blood boil! The lyrics are just contradictory! How the fuck can you be a 'punk rocker' and have 'flowers in your hair'? The punks were a reaction against all the hippy stuff. Initially I was suckered in when this story 'broke' but the proof was in the pudding, so when I first heard this track I saw through the thin facade for the false crap that it is. It's just so fake.



Are they indeed???trashpony said:And they're comparing her to Janis Joplin? Well fuck right off![]()
Where's me fucking boxing gloves, I'm not having THAT! No one can compare to Janis 
spoone said:wank song. im sort of glad i dont have something to rebel against, it seems like too much effort.

spoone said:wank song. im sort of glad i dont have something to rebel against, it seems like too much effort.

I'd go to war if it meant an end to this sort of drivel. (or I'd at least be a big military supporter and make a flag saying "welcome home, our boys" and stick photos of "our boys" up in the local supermarket and knit socks and stuff. I probably wouldn't be arsed to actually fight)Skim said:Rebel against this kind of senseless mediocrity – rise up against Sandi Thom![]()
Major Tom said:![]()
If you can't think of anything to rebel against then I can probably give you quite a lengthy list.![]()