Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Salma Yaqoob on 'Any Questions?' Friday 14th December 8pm

nwnm said:
...

It comes as no surprise that Galloway's post split lapdogs on here spend more time attempting to spread black propaganda about those who stayed in RESPECT, than they have promoting their own little grouping. That is because they have very little to promote. Whilst RESPECT is actively taking up issues such as gun crime in the communities effected, the other lot are scrabbling around in the gutter looking for muck to throw - ignorant of the fact that the longer they remain in the gutter; the more at home they will feel and the more marginal they will become.....

"black propaganda"?

You've got a cheek - who was it who said Galloway was witch-hunting Rees and going on about some "obscure cheque"? Who was who said Galloway was wrong about the state of Respect finances? And who was it who accused Linda Smith of being a ballot-rigger at an SWP meeting?... the list goes on

The only thing people are throwing around here is the TRUTH. And you cannot argue against a single fact, because it is the TRUTH that the SWP leadership have lied ... and lied ... and lied ... throughout this fiasco.

Your complicity and that of other SWP members in this fabric of deceit will sicken all decent socialists.
 
Udo Erasmus said:
So what was Salma like on AnyQuestions? :)
None of all this answers Udo Erasmus' question. Did Cllr Yaqoob have anything interesting to say at all? Or do you really think we are interested in all your trottery, especially if there's no saucy scandal involved?
 
JHE said:
Come on then, hack boy. Tell us what the line is from Social Workers' al-Respeq. I'm intrigued to know what measures you propose to combat gun crime.

I hope you are not going to disappoint by just gibbering about how you are against the (imaginary) 'demonisation of youth'.

you should have looked at the linky's on no. 49 in this thread....
 
Fisher_Gate said:
"black propaganda"?

You've got a cheek - who was it who said Galloway was witch-hunting Rees and going on about some "obscure cheque"? Who was who said Galloway was wrong about the state of Respect finances? And who was it who accused Linda Smith of being a ballot-rigger at an SWP meeting?... the list goes on

The only thing people are throwing around here is the TRUTH. And you cannot argue against a single fact, because it is the TRUTH that the SWP leadership have lied ... and lied ... and lied ... throughout this fiasco.

Your complicity and that of other SWP members in this fabric of deceit will sicken all decent socialists.

Actually You sicken most decent socialists with your lies. Show us one link to any of the threads on here stating that galloway was witch hunting rees about a cheque, which swp poster on here accused smith of ballot rigging - these are unsubstantiated imports of your own, (Even your 5K defecit wasn't true at the time). You obviously went to the Dr Goebbels school of propoganda, "If you are going to tell a lie....make it a very big one"
 
nwnm said:
you should have looked at the linky's on no. 49 in this thread....

Well, I have now and realise that of course I was wrong to expect any proposals from a daft bunch of Trots or their chums.
 
nwnm said:
...You obviously went to the Dr Goebbels school of propoganda
Is this close enough to invoke Godwin's Law (or whatever it is called when somebody invokes the Nazis and is automatically deemed to have lost the argument)?
 
cockneyrebel said:
nwnm didn't you bring up something about Linda Smith being investigated by the FBU a little while back? I'm pretty sure you did.
ABSOLUTELY NOT. And to those claiming I have posted on the SUN website, I have never posted on the SUN website, nor would I. It was set up by a disgruntled ex-SWP'er. Never liked him when he was in the party, certainly don't now.

Whatever my differences with Linda Smith - I wouldn't slur a left trade union leader. Disagree politically, or over tactics, but leave smears to the gutter press (and no, that doesn't mean feed 'em as I suspect some people in RR seem to be doing with the East London Advertiser). Those sorts of smear campaigns, done to undermine opponents, usually effects the left in general. This was the case with the ETU trial in the 1960's which may have unseated the CP in that particular union, but which ended up being led in the 1980's by Eric 'single union sweetheart deals' Hammond
 
Back
Top Bottom