DexterTCN
Troy and Abed in the morning
Once Saddam is dead...who will they blame next?nino_savatte said:It's so nice to have scapegoats - isn't it?
Once Saddam is dead...who will they blame next?nino_savatte said:It's so nice to have scapegoats - isn't it?
DexterTCN said:Once Saddam is dead...who will they blame next?


mauvais said:What exactly did they find him guilty of?
But Nemo, as Margaret Beckett pointed out this morning in response to the news, it's not for the UK government to meddle with the internal affairs of another country. Oh no.Nemo said:Nice to see our government speaking out against the death penalty.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
But Nemo, as Margaret Beckett pointed out this morning in response to the news, it's not for the UK government to meddle with the internal affairs of another country. Oh no.

mauvais said:What exactly did they find him guilty of? Last thing I heard, the trial wasn't progressing anywhere and wasn't finding anything definitive at all.
I know, but at what point did they actually manage to convict him of any of this stuff? The last I heard, they were trying to produce evidence about the Kurdish massacre but not really making much headway - not because it didn't happen, but because the trial was a bit of a farce.jæd said:The murder of villagers after an attempted assinatin attempt.... He ordered nearly a whole village masacred as retaliation. There's also the gassing of the Kurds to think about, starting a war with Iran (and using gas during part of it), invading Kuwait, and the systematic disappearence and torture of people he did like the look of.
The guys hardly blameless....
MIKHAIL MARGELOV, RUSSIAN FOREIGN AFFAIRS COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN
Does this not mean that someone wants to cover up their tracks, that someone wants to eliminate the main witness of what went on in Iraq over the past decades?
It is absolutely clear that all those plans that the Americans had made before the invasion have turned out to be unrealistic and have led to this situation, where today Iraq is on the brink of territorial disintegration.
The murder of villagers after an attempted assinatin attempt.... He ordered nearly a whole village masacred as retaliation. There's also the gassing of the Kurds to think about, starting a war with Iran (and using gas during part of it),
jæd said:The murder of villagers after an attempted assinatin attempt.... He ordered nearly a whole village masacred as retaliation.

Loki said:But Nemo, as Margaret Beckett pointed out this morning in response to the news, it's not for the UK government to meddle with the internal affairs of another country. Oh no.
jæd said:starting a war with Iran (and using gas during part of it)
nino_savatte said:Iraq was a secular country before Saddam Hussein came to power.
pyrovitae said:why hanging? seems a bit archaic, doesn't it?
ViolentPanda said:I'd wager that the decision is political.
Hanging is considered by some Muslims to be a shameful way of dying, so IMHO the court (possibly at the behest of the US) is sending a message. Saddam will be executed in the way a traitor would be, rather than "cleanly", by the sword or the bullet, which might be read as some form of "warrior's death".
ViolentPanda said:I'd wager that the decision is political.
Hanging is considered by some Muslims to be a shameful way of dying, so IMHO the court (possibly at the behest of the US) is sending a message. Saddam will be executed in the way a traitor would be, rather than "cleanly", by the sword or the bullet, which might be read as some form of "warrior's death".
Now you say it, it's obvious. There was some comment this morning that since he's already been sentenced to death then further trials may not need to go ahead. Can't remember who was saying that though...Nemo said:but a very convenient thing for him to be executed for before he can be tried for politically embarrassing things like Halabja.
Please don't try and trash every news thread with your relentless, raging fact-free conspiraloonery. Thank!Jazzz said:It's not him anyway, one of the doubles