Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

S T W C -- Shame On You!

Bloody hell TeeJay this has certianly been an interesting thread to read. never have I seen someone do quite so accurate impression of this little guy
bash.gif
 
I've just re-read all my posts on this thread. Anyone care to point out the specific posts which they think I should apologise for? Anyone have anything relevant to say about J4J?
 
rebel warrior said:
Apologising for trying to shove heaps of steaming shitty Right wing pro police propaganda down our throats would be a start...
Is the Stop The War Coalition going to apologise for trying to take political advantage of the situation? If not, will you distance yourself from those responsible?

I'm not referring to the accusations levelled at the J4J campaign in the press, but the execrable troops-out-nonvigil on the 25th July, the offensive 'Bliars' placards, and the entirely false claim on the current 'March for Peace & Liberty' flyers which under the heading 'Defend Civil Liberties' says 'One innocent man has already paid with his life for "increased police powers". If these new measures go through, more injustice will be visited on us all."
 
winjer said:
Is the Stop The War Coalition going to apologise for trying to take political advantage of the situation? If not, will you distance yourself from those responsible?

I'm not referring to the accusations levelled at the J4J campaign in the press, but the execrable troops-out-nonvigil on the 25th July, the offensive 'Bliars' placards, and the entirely false claim on the current 'March for Peace & Liberty' flyers which under the heading 'Defend Civil Liberties' says 'One innocent man has already paid with his life for "increased police powers". If these new measures go through, more injustice will be visited on us all."
why should they apologise? Why shouldn't they draw the links? It's all quite clearly connected isn't it?? :confused:

Should stwc just not talk about the London bombings/shoot-to-kill/Jean Charles/erosion of civil liberties for fear of being accused of being bandwagon jumpers and hijackers etc?

It would be quite bizarre and very disappointing if they didn't talk about these very worrying developments imo.

What's the 'entirely false claim' btw?
 
rebel warrior said:
Apologising for trying to shove heaps of steaming shitty Right wing pro police propaganda down our throats would be a start...
Like I said - would you care to point out the *specific* posts I should be apologising for? I can't recall saying anything about the police on this thread - but feel to point out to everyone which posts you are referring to. Likewise, maybe you could explain which posts have been "right wing" and why you are describing them as such - unless you are claiming that anyone who doesn't support the SWP/RUC or their front groups is automatically 'counter-revolutionary' and therefore automaticially "right wing".
 
Anything to say to/about the J4J campaign teej? Do you have anything relevant to say about J4J? Nope, nothing at all. Just as i thought.

(Or are only you allowed to roll out that one?)
 
I have said plenty about it. What exactly do you want me to add? Or is this just you trying to pick a pointless fight with me for purely personal reasons? I've already told you butchers, I am not interested.
 
TeeJay said:
I have said plenty about it. What exactly do you want me to add? Or is this just you trying to pick a pointless fight with me for purely personal reasons? I've already told you butchers, I am not interested.
Yes, you have said plenty. All relentlessly negative and smeary except for the above u-turn. A u-turn not followed by an apology, but by an argument that says that you were right to be wrong.

What do i want you to add? Say sorry. Say that you were wrong and say it here.
 
X-77 said:
Why shouldn't they draw the links? It's all quite clearly connected isn't it?? :confused:
No it isn't, except in the sense that the state is responsible for all those deaths, but the STWC was supposed to be a broad-based anti-war campaign, not a political alternative to the Labour Party.

Unless it's all just a front for something else... minor chord.

What's the 'entirely false claim' btw?
That Jean Charles de Menezes was executed because of anti-terror legislation, the implication being that the shoot-to-kill policy has some basis in law.
 
butchersapron said:
Yes, you have said plenty. All relentlessly negative and smeary except for the above u-turn. A u-turn not followed by an apology, but by an argument that says that you were right to be wrong.

What do i want you to add? Say sorry. Say that you were wrong and say it here.
So you are completely unable to set out which posts I should apologise for and what exactly I 'got wrong'? You can't even exaplin what my u-turn is? You are a fucking joke.
 
TeeJay said:
So you are completely unable to set out which posts I should apologise for and what exactly I 'got wrong'? You can't even exaplin what my u-turn is? You are a fucking joke.
It'd be the posts where you suggested that the Menezes family are dumb foreigners, and accused the people helping them of being two-faced liars, at a guess.
 
It's some fucking achievement, getting people like me and butchers more or less on the same side as webel - well done Teej. :D
 
winjer said:
It'd be the posts where you suggested that the Menezes family are dumb foreigners, and accused the people helping them of being two-faced liars, at a guess.
Provide some actual quotes or stop fucking lying. :rolleyes:
 
past caring said:
It's some fucking achievement, getting people like me and butchers more or less on the same side as webel - well done Teej. :D
Why? You're both clueless fuckwitted cunts who have a personal problem with me. Birds of a feather.
 
Back
Top Bottom