Is there???MikeMcc said:I believe that she should go. Quite rightly there is a ban on membership of organisations such as the Freemasons, why should membership of Opus Dei be viewed in a different light.

Uma said:Cautions are given to those who admit the offence and decide not to go to court to prove their innocence and the police don't quite have enough evidence. Hence a caution is agreed - still guilty.
JTG said:I know someone who accepted a caution for the sake of his family because he didn't want it to go through the courts. Like fuck is he a danger to children, he was set up by some nasty minded fuckwit who has robbed the teaching profession of a damn good teacher.
JTG said:I know someone who accepted a caution for the sake of his family because he didn't want it to go through the courts. Like fuck is he a danger to children, he was set up by some nasty minded fuckwit who has robbed the teaching profession of a damn good teacher.
I see you point and I suppose it depends on the context - art? hmm not sure how artistic it could be...chooch said:Yes. I'd have no problem with adults legally seeing a cartoon which depicted child sex, in the same way I'd have no problem with adults legally reading a book which described child sex (of which I can think of at least three on my shelves). Or a film depicting gang rape. Or a painting of genocide. It shouldn't be the law's place either to prescribe what the proper reaction to these would be.
No. It's a work of art. It can be a pleasant work of art, or an unpleasant work of art, an edifying one or a challenging one. Unless it's explicitly saying 'go out and treat black people badly', in which case it's incitement.
I prefer warped![]()

are you sure about that? Sorry if it seems harsh because you know him and I don't. But you don't just look at their ability to teach, you have to look at the person. You don't go on the SO register for down loading soft porn. Why was he set up by a fuckwit?JTG said:I know someone who accepted a caution for the sake of his family because he didn't want it to go through the courts. Like fuck is he a danger to children, he was set up by some nasty minded fuckwit who has robbe the teaching profession of a damn good teacher.

There are alwasy going to be miscarriages of justice unfortunately and it is up to the courts to decided based on the evidence. What DfES should not be doing is reviewing the decisions once a SO charge has been given. Victim can appeal ofcourse. Best staying away from young looking boys then...KeyboardJockey said:I've come across a person in a similar position. A gay man who liked younger men got involved with a young man who assured him that he was 17. The relationship was consensual but unequal with my aquaintance buying presents for the younger man and giving him money (not a lot just a tenner here and there I believe) after a couple of months gay mans boyfriend turned round and said 'I'm 15 3/4 and if you don't give me money I'll tell the police.' Blackmailer drained gay man of finances and when he couldn't give no more blackmailer made a complaint about unlawful sex to the police. My aquaintance refused a caution and fought it through the courts and lost and got six months on a segregation unit. The fact thatr he had been blackmailed wasn't even taken into account.
I dn't think that this is the only case of it's type either. I've heard of U16 young men patrolling the saunas and bars trolling round for victims to blackmail in London.
Uma said:There are alwasy going to be miscarriages of justice unfortunately and it is up to the courts to decided based on the evidence. What DfES should not be doing is reviewing the decisions once a SO charge has been given. Victim can appeal ofcourse. Best staying away from young looking boys then...
The intention of the film barely matters. Acts of violence, rape and sex with children don't do much for me, but whatever the film's about there'll be somebody out there that it does something for. The law can't say 'you're not allowed to get sexual gratification from any film featuring the following subjects:' and it shouldn't be based on the fear that someone might get sexual gratification from something depicted that most people consider distasteful or wrong. That way lies a spectrum of fuckwittery from Mary Whitehouse to the Taliban.Uma said:Obviously I have seen rape scenes in films etc, usually shown as an act of violence against the women/man to depict a certain act/character.
...But if the film was there to provide sexual gratification
My life would be poorer if I'd not read Crime and Punishment or seen Man bites Dog or experienced any of the other million works of art that deal with characters whose acts I find largely repugnant.If you are reading books which are about violence over women/children, then warped could be a very kind way of depicting your 'interests' for want of a better word.
Uma said:are you sure about that? Sorry if it seems harsh because you know him and I don't. But you don't just look at their ability to teach, you have to look at the person. You don't go on the SO register for down loading soft porn. Why was he set up by a fuckwit?![]()

Oi Mike!!!MikeMcc said:completely unconnected drivel
Red Jezza said:i'd like her to go, purely because the idea of an Opus dei loon running our education system is one I find well scary.
however...I'd not like her to go after this because
a) it's a departmental failure, rather than one ascribable to the sec of state, and
b) a sacrificial lamb would cause further oil to be poured onto what is - for me
- something the media are wildly overdoing, where the usual hysteria has won out.