Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Ruth Bader Ginsburg dead age 87

i have a certain poster on ignore, and have had for a long time. but it doesn't do me much good, does it, when the rest of yiz react to him. i see pages full of vitriolic insult against a person who perhaps likes the feel of exactly that. since the mods won't do the right thing in this case could yiz just put him on ignore too, so that we all can not see any of this and focus on informed give-and-take instead?
 
i have a certain poster on ignore, and have had for a long time. but it doesn't do me much good, does it, when the rest of yiz react to him. i see pages full of vitriolic insult against a person who perhaps likes the feel of exactly that. since the mods won't do the right thing in this case could yiz just put him on ignore too, so that we all can not see any of this and focus on informed give-and-take instead?

Could do, but then the message is out there that he can get away with his trolling. That it's acceptable to promote and endorse far right talking points.

He deserves to be shot down every time.
 
Could do, but then the message is out there that he can get away with his trolling. That it's acceptable to promote and endorse far right talking points.

He deserves to be shot down every time.

you're understanding of this and mine and irreconcilable.
 
i have a certain poster on ignore, and have had for a long time. but it doesn't do me much good, does it, when the rest of yiz react to him. i see pages full of vitriolic insult against a person who perhaps likes the feel of exactly that. since the mods won't do the right thing in this case could yiz just put him on ignore too, so that we all can not see any of this and focus on informed give-and-take instead?

You are quite right. I have a certain poster on ignore too, but made the mistake of looking today.
 
Last edited:
i have a certain poster on ignore, and have had for a long time. but it doesn't do me much good, does it, when the rest of yiz react to him. i see pages full of vitriolic insult against a person who perhaps likes the feel of exactly that. since the mods won't do the right thing in this case could yiz just put him on ignore too, so that we all can not see any of this and focus on informed give-and-take instead?
I admit, I usually have 'a certain poster' on ignore, but sometim es I can't help loking, and responding to his idiocies. Today was one of those:oops:
 
I guess the idea is if you just leave right-wing trolls to it, the boards will be overrun. In other words, non-members will see this as a right wing friendly forum. That will become its identity. Long standing members will still 'get it'; but for me as a general strategy it's a bad idea.
 
Speaking of right wing trolls:

right-wing conspiracy theorist Alex Jones is spreading a conspiracy theory that Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg chose to die to help Democrats in the 2020 election.

Video of Jones’ Infowars show was posted online by the watchdog group Media Matters for America.

“And this, you know, I talked to a White House adviser as well, not just the two of the White House lawyers today, just in the last 30 minutes before we went — when you were already live, I was talking to them,” Jones claimed.

“And they said, look, the really sick math is they had her on life support, they could keep her alive with adrenaline and growth hormone and blood transfusions, and it was her wish to go ahead and die to get the vote out as a blood sacrifice because her main mission was to get abortion, which she helped get through, and that blood sacrifice that [Sen. Chuck] Schumer [D-NY] talked about, if you want a war, quit letting us have the blood of the babies, we need that satanic energy,” Jones claimed.


FFS. The thing is I know there's going to be people who believe this nonsense.
 
Last edited:
Apparently the Democrats have nobody but themselves to blame for Trump about to appoint a second conservative leaning judge to the Supreme Court - in 2013 Harry Reid changed the rules from a 60 vote approval to a simple majority, know then as the ‘nuclear option.

Mitch McConnell warned at the time:

"You’ll regret this, and you may regret this a lot sooner than you think."



Video of rabid trump supporter McConnell from a rabbit- hole trump supporting youtube poster. Again. Check the comments - glee at Ginsburg's death and how it will let Trump take over. This is the sort of shit you want to bring to urban.
 
Last edited:
I guess the idea is if you just leave right-wing trolls to it, the boards will be overrun. In other words, non-members will see this as a right wing friendly forum. That will become its identity. Long standing members will still 'get it'; but for me as a general strategy it's a bad idea.
Actually, on reflection, that's a really good point
 
Speaking of right wing trolls:




FFS. The thing is I know there's going to be people who believe this nonsense.

Pizzagate, the bloke expended a round shooting the store cupboard of but there actually was a a good deal of professionalism about how he went about doing what he did - regrettable as the whole thing was, for the restaurant, the Sandy Hook thing must have cost him some base too, and the two month delay of survival food when he was talking about eating neighbours - he just a bad smell
 
Of course, the right is practically gleeful:

Ginsburg was a champion of something, but it wasn’t justice for the unborn. Sure, the left’s superhero was a tireless and relentless liberal judge, but she won’t go down in history as the saint Democrats suggest, far from it. Chief Justice Roberts failed to mention that because of her pro-abortion stance, millions of unborn babies won’t have the opportunity to remember Ginsburg, who fought up until the end for the legal right for mothers to kill their unborn babies.

What an awful legacy to leave behind, let alone carry into the hereafter.

While I’m sorry for her family’s loss, let’s be honest; the crocodile tears flowing down leftists’ faces have little to do with Ginsburg. Democrats mourn because they are about to lose their “insurance policy,” with the Supreme Court set to return to its commonsensical roots of interpreting the law rather than legislating it.


Speaking of crocodile tears.... its a bit ironic that the author herself benefitted from some of Ginsburg's work, but yet counts her as a villain.
 
Back
Top Bottom