Streathamite
ideological dogmatist
Yes, I saw Barrett's flagged up too.
the US Sun
![]()
Pelosi open to impeachment if Trump fills Supreme Court seat to kill Obamacare
NANCY Pelosi refused to rule out the possibility of using impeachment to hold up the Republicans’ push for a Supreme Court confirmation following the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg. During an i…www.the-sun.com

There's a US Sun ?
There's a US Sun ?
they must be liberal news over there
possibly far left![]()
True to its' roots thenLast time I checked The U.S. Sun was a place for bigfoot and UFO sightings, not "real news."
"The handmaid's tale" is not a blueprint for society ffsThis woman is likely to be Trump's nominee to take Ginsburg's place:
![]()
Amy Coney Barrett's Connection to People of Praise Explained
Amy Coney Barrett and her husband both belong to the People of Praise group, which teaches that men have authority over their wives.www.newsweek.com
I've been hearing for a couple of years that the Republicans wanted the deciding vote against Roe v. Wade to be a woman.
To which Trump said:Ginsburg died on Friday, from pancreatic cancer at the age of 87. NPR reported that she had dictated a statement to her granddaughter.
“My most fervent wish is that I will not be replaced until a new president is installed,” it said.
Just when you think you've reached the depths of how low Trump can go, he goes and surprises you still.“I don’t know that she said that, or was that written out by Adam Schiff or Pelosi?
“I would be more inclined to the second, OK – you know, that came out of the wind. That sounds so beautiful, but that sounds like a Schumer deal, or maybe Pelosi or for Shifty Schiff. So that came out of the wind, let’s say.


Could $200 million put a dent in many of America's problems? The federal government spends more than that every 30 minutes and it doesn't seem to be getting anywhere.
Apparently the Democrats have nobody but themselves to blame for Trump about to appoint a second conservative leaning judge to the Supreme Court - in 2013 Harry Reid changed the rules from a 60 vote approval to a simple majority, know then as the ‘nuclear option.
Mitch McConnell warned at the time:
"You’ll regret this, and you may regret this a lot sooner than you think."
Absoluitely - very well put.The motto of the Republican Party used to be "character matters." If a lawmaker is motivated more by petty revenge than by doing the right thing, they have no business in office, especially when it has the probability of effecting the health, welfare, and basic rights of millions. The man is fucking sick in the head if that's his motivation and so is anyone who supports him.
End of.
The motto of the Republican Party used to be "character matters." If a lawmaker is motivated more by petty revenge than by doing the right thing, they have no business in office, especially when it has the probability of effecting the health, welfare, and basic rights of millions. The man is fucking sick in the head if that's his motivation and so is anyone who supports him.
End of.
Apparently the Democrats have nobody but themselves to blame for Trump about to appoint a second conservative leaning judge to the Supreme Court - in 2013 Harry Reid changed the rules from a 60 vote approval to a simple majority, know then as the ‘nuclear option.
Mitch McConnell warned at the time:
"You’ll regret this, and you may regret this a lot sooner than you think."
If the shoe was on the other foot, I’d say the Dems would almost certainly do the same and their supporters would clap them on.
Part of the reason why the republicans have managed to fuck them so hard these past several years is their boneheaded insistence on playing by the rules under the misguided belief that, despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary, the republicans will continue to act in good faith and not shank them at every turn. So no, your assertion is wrong. Try again.If the shoe was on the other foot, I’d say the Dems would almost certainly do the same and their supporters would clap them on.
What's the American Way?
If the shoe was on the other foot, I’d say the Dems would almost certainly do the same and their supporters would clap them on.
Except the historical record shows that, time and again, they have done precisely the opposite and played fair. Try again, dumbass.If the shoe was on the other foot, I’d say the Dems would almost certainly do the same and their supporters would clap them on.
If the shoe was on the other foot, I’d say the Dems would almost certainly do the same and their supporters would clap them on.
If the shoe was on the other foot, I’d say the Dems would almost certainly do the same and their supporters would clap them on.
"This thing that's happening under the Republicans, that's what the Dems want. It'll happen under the Dems!!!"
Do you have any idea just how fucking thick you (and your pal Donald) sound when you come out with this shit?