You clearly read neither the Tory manifesto nor the bit of my post you quoted. Notice the words like 'seem' and 'Or is it a mask?'
Right, let's deal with this then:
1. I didn't quote " a bit of your post" - I quoted the entire first post of yours from the "Is Cameron A Socialist?..." thread.
2. Your "seem" and "Or is it a mask" thing - I read up on the thread in question, and came across this post of yours (post #119):
...People forget that the Tory Party isn't just a bunch of right-wingers. There are several groupings, the Eurosceptics and Europhiles being the two best known. Maggie had her Drys and Wets. But there's also the libertarian wing, exemplified by David Davis. Now, when you consider that Maggie would class Cameron as Dripping Wet, the Libertarian Socialist theme does become very plausible. Cameron has lurched the Conservatives a fair way Left regardless. Now he's merging that with Libertarianism - or disguising it with Libertarianism.
But then there's that nagging voice of cynicism in the back of my head. And that voice says Obama. Either he's trying to ape Obama or emulate him. So, do I give him the benefit of the doubt? I'm not a Libertarian myself - I recognise the need for a balance - but I do intensely dislike the lurch to Statism that has taken place under Labour. 'One nation under CCTV' as Banksy put it. And endless regulation.
Let's take here your quote "Now, when you consider that Maggie would class Cameron as Dripping Wet, the Libertarian Socialist theme does become very plausible. Cameron has lurched the Conservatives a fair way Left regardless." As subsequent events have shown since the Conversative/Lib Dem coalition came into power, Cameron has done nothing "socialist" of the sort - he's a post-Thatcherite neo-liberalist, who in fact has gone further than Thatcher in some respects (e.g the welfare state, education, the NHS, the Royal Mail). And as for his "libertariansim", he's a solid Tory right-winger (so your "....has lurched the Conservatives a fair way Left regardless" comment is fundamentally inaccurate) who has no interest in "freeing people from the State" - quite the opposite, in fact (see "endless regulation", for starters). So your analysis on this one is inaccurate, I'm afraid...and you seem to lean towards actually saying that Cameron is a "libertarian Socialist", so your "seem" and "Or is it a mask" do not qualify here.
And as for your Tory manifesto quote, well, the Coalition has done the exact opposite to everything you've quoted from them there (do I really need to go into the details of this one? They've all been discussed here many, many times already), so no, your current reliance on that one as "proof" really doesn't stand up to scrutiny either. And for the record, the only time I read a even a bit of the Tory manifesto (at college), I wanted to beat myself round the head with a blunt object....and besides, does one really have to read a manifesto (never a reliable document at the very best of times) to suss out what a political group in power is really up to?