kyser_soze
Hawking's Angry Eyebrow
Before we moved, we had a look about and actually at the moment its the same price or slightly (like £5 a week) more than fully credible ex-council stock which is half the size and half as well heated, shaped etc. The fact is i'm paying £90 which is fucking amazing for what i get. If you want a lot cheaper then you share a very big house with lots of people, but it won't get much cheaper without special circumstances like knowing someone or living with the landlord etc. In short, i'm paying the same i would for a room in a big shared house further out - its not much money at all. Our friends are living together in old, cold, SEVEN PERSON houses in places like Lea Valley are paying more than us. We know its a good deal here, and we save loads on heating and water here cos its so new (and waters included).
As for gentrification, i think we need to understand what that proccess is. An area is neglected by its council and developers see cheap land to turn into a new market - people from outside the area. Now the problem here is uneven development aimed at people from outside the area which obviously favours new, richer people displacing the original residents. Although often the 'gentrifiers' are not actually richer at all, just new to the area, younger, and interested in nice shops and new developments. Now who is responsible, the people moving in, or the developers? You are going to move to what you can afford and this city is a city of immigrants. (You aren't actually from london btw, and I am, several generations at the very least). The logic of blaming gentrification on the people rather than the developers and the economic system leads you to this conlusion: everyone stay in the area they were born in. I think gentrification is often a by-word for parochialism and lazy assumoptions where actual politics should be, and i rarely use the word. You don't fight gentrification by wishing younger workers wouldn't move into the obvious choice for them, you do it by fighting for equal recognition for the longer term residents and social tenants. Which I do
![]()
Fuck me, where'd your sense of humour go Tax? Or did it strike a nerve? Something of an overresponse here...
). The logic of blaming gentrification on the people rather than the developers and the economic system leads you to this conlusion: everyone stay in the area they were born in. I think gentrification is often a by-word for parochialism and lazy assumoptions where actual politics should be, and i rarely use the word. You don't fight gentrification by wishing younger workers wouldn't move into the obvious choice for them, you do it by fighting for equal recognition for the longer term residents and social tenants. Which I do



I'm not even getting invloved in this madness. Gumtree here we come.