Yeah, but did he tit you up, cos he told us he got further than that. We're talking downstairs here . . .
Stereotypical Hollywood light entertainment guff; fine for Christmas Day afternoon (on DVD, not the idjut box!) when Granny, Mums and Dads and the nippers need to commune, but otherwise . . . five of those mysterious white doggie turds in the middle of the living room carpet out of five.
I liked it when it came out. I was about 10 years old though. Now, it is ok but saved mainly by Rickman and Freeman and less so by Michael McShane and Michael Wincott who plays Guy of Gisborne and Brian Blessed.
Fail: Costner and Cristian Slater's American Accents. Lazy acting indeed.
Win: Sean Connery at the end.
Fail: That Song
Win: Bows and Arrows are always cool.
it was cool when you were twelve especially the tree huts
but as you get older it loses its appeal.
would never buy it or go out my way to watch it because somethings should never be re-watched, but if it cropped up on tv around xmas and i happened to be loafing of the couch one evening i could watch it fairly easily.
All the suggestions so far I would say are still more charismatic than Costner. The only person worse than Costner I can think of is Steven Seagal. Maybe Christopher Lambert. I simply do not understand how Costner can possibly have gotten to the position he is in the entertainment world without satanic influence.
Oh, and if you can fast forward between the bits with Rickman in it, the film's fine, otherwise it sucks.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.