Discussion in 'photography, graphics & art' started by editor, Sep 27, 2018.
let me check some more sites...
Wait - no flash?
Photokina 2018: First look at new Ricoh GR III
Not coming out till Jan 2019
Nothing about weatherproofing that I've seen yet.
Specs here Ricoh announces development of long-awaited GR III
It could be exactly the same and if it was dustproof I'd go for it.
On the other hand it could have a 50MP world class full frame sensor and a unicorn rainbow button and if it wasn't dustproof I'd be "meh, fuck it".
I still haven't got round to sending my GR off to get the sensor dust removed and I constantly debate whether it's worth it or not if it's just going to get dusty again, given the time and expense.
Who buys these things? I mean, I get it technically, ish - but it's very much a niche between ubiquitous high quality phone cameras and proper SLRs. I'm struggling to imagine a serious market outside of the 'but this is what I've always done' collective, and that's sales death.
Clingfilm is literally £2 a roll, m8.
It's just about the smallest, high quality street shooting camera you can get, with fantastic manual controls and speed of operation. Stealthy and fast, it's probably my favourite digital camera of all time.
Ricoh GR II: The best camera for Street Photography by Frederik Trovatten
Why the RICOH GR II is the Best Street Photography Camera
REVIEW: RICOH GR - BEST CAMERA FOR STREET PHOTOGRAPHY?
Street and travel photographers, and any photographer who wants a super high quality compact for when they can't be arsed carrying their full kit. The GR beats high-end (contemporary) APS-C DSLRs with top-quality lenses - it's just restricted to that one focal length. Their film GRs sold on pretty much the same basis.
Financially, Ricoh makes most of their money from office equipment, so they don't need to sell cameras to survive. Canon makes most of their money from non-camera sales too. Nobody buys enough cameras that you can really compete from sales of those alone. Even Nikon and Leica make a lot of other optical products.
There may be a flaw in that solution.
Separate names with a comma.