agricola
a genuine importer of owls
I do appreciate your replies, but I feel here you are going a bit detective boy...
If OB want to charge someone they know well enough to talk up the evidence to the CPS to get the charge.
In this case there were two corpses and an intoxicated driver.
That is enough for the CPS to at least get involved.
The police chose not to go there. They told the CPS that their colleague’s kid was only off his face and that had no bearing on him killing the two men he killed.
Call me a cynic...
Our judicial system makes it nearly impossible to bring a private criminal prosecution. If it were not so hard I would bet a handsome wedge it would get a good chance of death by dangerous driving conviction if put before a court.
The problem here is that it isn't enough for the CPS to get involved (certainly not at that stage anyway), and what they told the CPS when it came to charge him might actually have been what the evidence suggested in this case - an accident on an unlit, national speed limit road, at night, where the people who got killed were crossing the road (and that is not to blame them at all for this) and where the driver took some action prior to the crash to try to prevent it (at least based on what his mate said, though it would be easy to prove/disprove what he said based on the marks left on the road) is going to be very difficult to prove as death by dangerous or careless.


