fanta said:But cultural imperialism, given the circumstances that enabled it's rise, was inevitable!
Therefore, the decline of languages like Welsh, Cornish and Irish were likewise inevitable! I mean, one could even argue the process has carried on with native speakers of Dutch, Flemish and Danish often being as fluent in English as well as their native tongues, and English becoming one of the main requirements for international business.
Yes, that's another kind of cultural imperialism.
But I think even Fanta would agree there's a difference between a Dutch person who is fluent in her/his own language (which is officially recognised and respected) but also speaks English/German/French fluently to communicate on the internet or whatever and a minority language that (until 1967) had no official recognition and was literally beaten out of a generation of kids.
Of course things have changed now and the British state has adopted a view that the Welsh language can be thrown some crumbs. The fundamentals that threaten its existence as a living community language aren't altered (i.e. free-market capitalism, unaffordable housing and lack of decent jobs) but as long as we can watch Pobol y Cwm on $4C and get a pitiful grant for the National Eisteddfod we shouldn't complain too much, should we?
Historical circumstances mean that languages will change, evolve, decline and/or come to prominence.
What was your subject on Mastermind - the bleedin' obvious?
I wonder if you think the decline of Latin, Ancient Arabic, Aramaic or even Olde/Middle English were inevitable or some dastardly imperialist plot?!
Latin evolved into Italian, Spanish, French, etc, etc. Ancient Arabic presumably became modern Arabic. Old English became Modern English with a lot of Norman and other words thrown in. Your point?


