Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Republican Majority Leader of Congress up on Criminal Charges

Only under certain terms of course - not when they violate the local elction code or are you the judge in this case?

Did you say:

"I don't, but thier is no law actualy broken, check the indictment.
They have to say what spicific law is being broken"


Or not (which is already enough to get you kicked out of court)

That link is shit btw - link to the story.
 
butchersapron said:
Only under certain terms of course - not when they violate the local elction code or are you the judge in this case?

Did you say:

"I don't, but thier is no law actualy broken, check the indictment.
They have to say what spicific law is being broken"


Or not (which is already enough to get you kicked out of court)
Click to expand...

The money when to the RNC.

Thats the republican national committee.

And they are allowed to give.

But the "rules" for a grand jury are not the same as for a judge and jury.

The joke is that you can indict a ham samwitch.

Prossicuters have extremly laditude.
 
pbman said:
The money when to the RNC.

Thats the republican national committee.

And they are allowed to give.

But the "rules" for a grand jury are not the same as for a judge and jury.

The joke is that you can indict a ham samwitch.

Prossicuters have extremly laditude.
Click to expand...
Is that a 'yes' then? You did say:

"I don't, but thier is no law actualy broken, check the indictment.
They have to say what spicific law is being broken"

An actual lie about the indictment as proven by this, from the actual indictment:

"The defendants entered into an agreement with each other or with TRMPAC [Texans for a Republican Majority Political Action Committee] to make a political contribution in violation of the Texas election code,"

You were lying weren't you PB? You hadn't read the indictment, you had no idea what it said - so you lied.
 
butchersapron said:
Is that a 'yes' then? You did say:

"I don't, but thier is no law actualy broken, check the indictment.
They have to say what spicific law is being broken"

An actual lie about the indictment as proven by this, from the actual indictment:

"The defendants entered into an agreement with each other or with TRMPAC [Texans for a Republican Majority Political Action Committee] to make a political contribution in violation of the Texas election code,"

You were lying weren't you PB? You hadn't read the indictment, you had no idea what it said - so you lied.
Click to expand...

he made a passing reference to breaking texas law.

As expected in a texas court.

But what law did he break?

ROFLMAO

I'll help you out even.

http://www.lawsource.com/also/usa.cgi?tx

Quote the section he broke.

And connect it to him.
 
Neither of us are judging the case - what we can go on for our own entertainment though, is your outright lie that:

"I don't, but thier is no law actualy broken, check the indictment.
They have to say what spicific law is being broken"

which is directly contradicted by the actual indictement:

"The defendants entered into an agreement with each other or with TRMPAC [Texans for a Republican Majority Political Action Committee] to make a political contribution in violation of the Texas election code,"

You've beeen caught red-handed lying - confess like a good christian.
 
butchersapron said:
Neither of us are judging the case - what we can go on for our own entertainment though, is your outright lie that:

"I don't, but thier is no law actualy broken, check the indictment.
They have to say what spicific law is being broken"

which is directly contradicted by the actual indictement:

"The defendants entered into an agreement with each other or with TRMPAC [Texans for a Republican Majority Political Action Committee] to make a political contribution in violation of the Texas election code,"

You've beeen caught red-handed lying - confess like a good christian.
Click to expand...

Come back with more than a vauge reference to texas law. :rolleyes:

Thats just saying he broke the law.

People have a right to know witch law they are acused of breaking.

Unless you are a republican i guess. :rolleyes:
 
I don't need to - all i need it your own lying claims about the indictment and the part of the indictment that shows that you are a liar. Both are above.

Have a good night, don't get catholic holy water down your dress now.
 
butchersapron said:
I don't need to - all i need it your own lying claims about the indictment and the part of the indictment that shows that you are a liar. Both are above.

Have a good night, don't get catholic holy water down your dress now.
Click to expand...



Scurry off then. :rolleyes:

Pbman - what spicific law did he break?

Butcher - texas election law, you lier.


Here's my first take on this indictment (I've only read the indictment and nothing more for now): The indictment is three pages in length. Other than a statement that "one or more" of 3 individuals, including Tom DeLay, entered into an illegal conspiracy, I can't find a single sentence tying Tom DeLay to a crime. That is, there's not a single sentence tying DeLay to the contribution. The indictment describes the alleged conduct of two other individuals, but nothing about DeLay. You would think if Ronnie Earle had even a thin reed of testimony linking DeLay to the contribution, it would have been noted in the indictment to justify the grand jury's action. Moreover, not only is there no information about DeLay committing acts in furtherance of a conspiracy, there's no information about DeLay entering into a conspiracy. I honestly believe that unless there's more, this is an egregious abuse of prosecutorial power. It's a disgrace. I understand that not everything has to be contained in an indictment, but how about something!
Click to expand...

http://www.michellemalkin.com/

Next time read the link i gave you. :D :D :D
 
What a strange concept - there is no limit to how much can be donated to political parties in the United States.

Imagine that, donate buckets of money to a party and you get what you want.

No wonder the tobacco, oil and sugar companies donate to both parties.

Truly an American concept - money talks. The more money you give, the more more power/influence you have.

No f'ing wonder that this country is so high in the "corrupt government" listing. They legalize it nonsense.

So much for the power of the little person.

God Bless America - 'cause the rest of the world damns such corrupt behavior.

And they wish to impart their version of government corruption on the rest of the world - give me a break.

To the person in the little box that keeps appearing - you are totally correct. Your corrupt government encourages corruption. Even passes laws to protect the corruption.

Land of the Free - bullshit - Survival of the richest is more fitting.

Sad, sad, sad.
 
pbman said:
Scurry off then. :rolleyes:

Pbman - what spicific law did he break?

Butcher - texas election law, you lier.


http://www.michellemalkin.com/

Next time read the link i gave you. :D :D :D
Click to expand...

No, how about you reading your own link and your own claim

"I don't, but thier is no law actualy broken, check the indictment.
They have to say what spicific law is being broken"

then the part of the actual indcitment itself that shows this to be a lie:

"The defendants entered into an agreement with each other or with TRMPAC [Texans for a Republican Majority Political Action Committee] to make a political contribution in violation of the Texas election code,"

then tell me just why you're showing me where Malkin says that she does not think the indictment will stand up - not that there is no charge specifying what law has been broken - because her claim bears no relation to yours and i cannot see why you're trying to use it to back up your lies.
 
Loki said:
foil5.jpg
Click to expand...

I love that pic! :D
 
nino_savatte said:
Michelle Malkin? Highly credible source....I don't think.
Click to expand...

Yeah, but peebs listens to a skank like Malkin for the same reason he listens to a skank like Coulter. The sad sack of shit thinks he's got a chance of getting in there... :)
 
phildwyer said:
Nino Savatte? Highly original rhetorician--I *don't* think!
Click to expand...

Got a point Mr Ego? Or are you playing at being the shouty drunk in the corner of the pub?

Are you a fan of Malkin's, phil?
 
slaar said:
Another day, another accusation towards the elite republican leadership.<snip>
Click to expand...
It's also probably worth mentioning that in addition to the Republican House leader Tom DeLay being indicted, the Republican Senate Leader Bill Frist is being investigated by the SEC for insider trading. See e.g.

http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=05/09/29/1812254

There are a whole raft of these inquiries going on into the gang of crooks currently running the US.
Then there's Jack Abramoff, there's David Safavian, the President’s chief procurement officer, stepped down two weeks ago, arrested last week, on charges of lying to investigators and obstructing a separate federal investigation into Jack Abramoff's dealings in Washington. Jake Bernstein, Executive Editor of The Texas Observer, what about Jack Abramoff, the Republican super-lobbyist, as salon.com describes him, known to have bragged about his contacts with Karl Rove, indicted in Florida last month along with his business partner on wire fraud and conspiracy fraud charges related to their purchase of a fleet of gambling boats? This week, three men were arrested, including two who received payments from Abramoff's business partner in a mafia-style killing of the man from whom Abramoff and his partner purchased the gambling boats, and Jack Abramoff's ties to, well, Tom DeLay.
Click to expand...
 
butchersapron said:
No, how about you reading your own link and your own claim

"I don't, but thier is no law actualy broken, check the indictment.
They have to say what spicific law is being broken"

then the part of the actual indcitment itself that shows this to be a lie:

"The defendants entered into an agreement with each other or with TRMPAC [Texans for a Republican Majority Political Action Committee] to make a political contribution in violation of the Texas election code,"

then tell me just why you're showing me where Malkin says that she does not think the indictment will stand up - not that there is no charge specifying what law has been broken - because her claim bears no relation to yours and i cannot see why you're trying to use it to back up your lies.
Click to expand...

Thats not spicific.

Their is no dirct evidnece listed in the indictment, to delay.

If your ass was up on such a vauge thing, i suspect you wouldn't like it one bit.........
 
Still they may yet break the Reagan administration's record for most administration officials, lobbyists and politicans indicted, which would be something for the history books. Along with the "greatest strategic disaster in US history" (according to Gen. William Odom)
 
Bernie Gunther said:
Face it, your heroes are a bunch of crooks pbman.

Incompetent crooks at that.
Click to expand...

He's not a hero, check my first post, i said you can hang him if you can.

But he's not like a democrat in NO, to be a crook he would have to benifit personaly.

This is a camphain thing, that helped others in the state.

Its charity.
 
Bernie Gunther said:
Still they may yet break the Reagan administration's record for most administration officials, lobbyists and politicans indicted, which would be something for the history books. Along with the "greatest strategic disaster in US history" (according to Gen. William Odom)
Click to expand...

lol

Source that in comparison to slick willy. :rolleyes:
 
pbman said:
You have a problem with asian female republicans?
Click to expand...

No, I have a problem with crypto-fascistic mouthpieces who think they are great journalists and believe their opinions are government policy.
 
pbman said:
He's not a hero, check my first post, i said you can hang him if you can.

But he's not like a democrat in NO, to be a crook he would have to benifit personaly.

This is a camphain thing, that helped others in the state.

Its charity.
Click to expand...

No, all your heroes are crooks: Reagan, Dubya, Cheney.....
 
pbman said:
lol

Source that in comparison to slick willy. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Clinton got his cock out when he shouldn't have but he didn't use the state as a means of securing personal wealth...unlike Cheney and Dubya. I know which crime is worse and it isn't some silly sexual pecadillo that has been blown out of proportion. On that basis, this makes the Repubs look like sexless prudes whose motivation for impeaching Clinton was based on their envy of his sexual prowess. Indeed, one could argue that they were impotent.
 
pbman said:
You have a problem with asian female republicans?
Click to expand...

Do you know how pathetic the above attempt at personalising a comment about the credibility of a commentator into a smear implying racism and sexism makes you look?

I suspect not.
 
nino_savatte said:
No, I have a problem with crypto-fascistic mouthpieces who think they are great journalists and believe their opinions are government policy.
Click to expand...

Her family was locked up in a "concentration camp" or internmetn camp, and you have the nerve to call her a fascist? :rolleyes:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Aladdin
How can ordinary people around the world oppose American oligarchs and their Fascist leader
9 10 11 12 13
Replies
363
Views
11K
MrJoshua123
M
Dom Traynor
Bong Bong's time is up. Anti corruption hearings and protests in the Phillipines.
Replies
0
Views
202
Dom Traynor
Dom Traynor
breadandcircuse
Kash Patel's time is up
Replies
21
Views
684
bcuster
bcuster
bcuster
Is Cory Booker's Time is up?
Replies
23
Views
715
bcuster
bcuster
breadandcircuse
A thread to note the justice coming for those who enabled, aided and abetted a criminal president. How long will it take?
Replies
16
Views
629
dessiato
dessiato
Back
Top Bottom