Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Rent now buy later

... I'd also be inerested to know where they got their data.

It's not either of the big mortgage lenders.
...the house price index compiled by the Department of Communities and Local Government, using data on all completed sales (and so more comprehensive than the partial surveys by the Halifax and Nationwide)...
I have no idea whether that's genuinely more credible than any other metric.

Seems to a case of getting a different answer depending on who you ask...

TBH, I'm a little dubious of putting too much faith in any of the bank/BS reports - I'm not saying they're wrong, just that banks do have somewhat of a vested interest in these matters, and how many times have you trusted the word of a bank before.....?
 
ah so completed sales.

They must be primarily the Land registry. How long does it take for a sale to complete? And how long does it take for the land registry to update their stats, and then to transfer these to the DCLG.

Sounds a bit laggy to me -at least 3 months behind i reckon.

Do the DCLG use seasonal adjstment also? Can't be beothered to trawl through their website. Too complicated!
 
Yeh this is the thing I don't like with Shared Ownership if your property goes down in price you still have to pay the agreed shgare price don't you?

This is right but......

If you think about property as a home and not an investment then who cares? Maybe I am boring but I would like to find a home I loved in a place I love (if this exists) and never sell it. If it went down in value I would not care and if it went up in value I would not care.
 
If you think about property as a home and not an investment then who cares? Maybe I am boring but I would like to find a home I loved in a place I love (if this exists) and never sell it. If it went down in value I would not care and if it went up in value I would not care.
You are boring, and so am I.

If I could find somewhere nice (cosy little 2 bed, somewhere people don't get shot too often, close to a pub, that sort of thing) that I could afford without bankrupting myself, then I'd be more than happy to buy it, live there indefinitely and not care a bugger about rising/falling property prices.

Just living somewhere where I know I can't be turfed out at a couple of weeks notice on the whim of someone I've never even met, would be a huge step up in the world for me...
 
This is right but......

If you think about property as a home and not an investment then who cares? Maybe I am boring but I would like to find a home I loved in a place I love (if this exists) and never sell it. If it went down in value I would not care and if it went up in value I would not care.

Unless your fortunate enough to be financially independednt then its always going to affect you whether you like it or not, you'd very soon care if you were in negative equity and then were made redundant for example.
 
This page interests me.

http://www.housepricecrash.co.uk/index.php

The Land Registry's peak came in January, about three months behind the Nationwide and six months behind the Halifax, which peaked way back in August. According to the Land Registry, the number of transactions has halved this year.

The indices on completed sales - Land Registry, Local Government and FT Index - are all in agreement, which makes me think that they are more reliable. They all only give figures to May, but they show a peak in either January or February this year, and then a fall by around 1.5% from then until May. Given that the number of sales has halved, this doesn't seem a large fall to me. A great many people must still be sitting on their hands.

Housing is all about self-fulfilling prophecies - if enough people think prices will go down, they will; if people think they'll go up, they will. I don't quite understand the banks' attitude to this. Surely it is in their interest to talk down any falls. The last list of predictions interests me – the truth that this reveals: nobody really has a clue what will happen next.
 
TBH, I'm a little dubious of putting too much faith in any of the bank/BS reports - I'm not saying they're wrong, just that banks do have somewhat of a vested interest in these matters, and how many times have you trusted the word of a bank before.....?
But the banks' vested interest is to talk down any crash, isn't it?
 
But the banks' vested interest is to talk down any crash, isn't it?
Is it?

They've screwed themselves by investing in US mortgage backed securities, which are now next to worthless. So they've got no spare cash - the last thing they want is to have to lend lots of money. In a falling property market it makes perfect sense for a lender to be very cautious, stick to safe bets only, ask for massive deposits, offer rubbish rates, etc.

All very convenient - the banks don't want to lend, so they big-up exactly the type of scenario that gives them the perfect excuse not to lend...
 
Is it?

They've screwed themselves by investing in US mortgage backed securities, which are now next to worthless. So they've got no spare cash - the last thing they want is to have to lend lots of money. In a falling property market it makes perfect sense for a lender to be very cautious, stick to safe bets only, ask for massive deposits, offer rubbish rates, etc.

All very convenient - the banks don't want to lend, so they big-up exactly the type of scenario that gives them the perfect excuse not to lend...
S'pose. But it is their business to lend - eventually they'll have to start again.
 
Yes, unless your financially independent you are at the mercy of outside forces, including economic ones.
There were no doubt a fair few wealthy Argentinians who thought they were financially independent until a couple of years ago. Life has no guarantees - I think it is a bad way to go through life wishing it did.
 
There were no doubt a fair few wealthy Argentinians who thought they were financially independent until a couple of years ago. Life has no guarantees - I think it is a bad way to go through life wishing it did.

Yes, Argentina is a good example of what can happen.
 
Who was it on this thread that said it would be good to have more properties purely for rental through the council, and have this scheme? This scheme does sound better than part-rent, part-buy, at any rate.

I bet they'll nearly all be one or two-bedroom flats with no gardens, though, like current part-rent, part-buy homes are now.

Is that even possible these days? Does the right-to-buy policy cover all social housing or do the rules allow for state owned rental property that can't be bought by tenants?

My HA flat doesn't have to buy - Peabody Trust have only recently made a few of their properties right-to-buy. The same goes for some other HAs, I think, going on the home exchanges I see which often request a home with right-to-buy.

I can, however, somehow or other transfer my right-to-buy to another property, though I have no idea how that works. I would also be given a fair whack of money to move out if I bought privately.

I still can't, though - no bank would give me a mortgage and my income's too low to pay one.

This is right but......

If you think about property as a home and not an investment then who cares? Maybe I am boring but I would like to find a home I loved in a place I love (if this exists) and never sell it. If it went down in value I would not care and if it went up in value I would not care.

But if you bought a one-bedroom flat and then had a kid, you'd want to move to a bigger place. Or if you split up with your partner, you wouldn't want to be stuck living together forever. If you lost your job, or your partner died, or something else like that happened, then you might need to downsize to a smaller place.

I also want to buy just one home and stay put for as long as I want - or until I retire, at least - but the world doesn't always let you do what you want.
 
But if you bought a one-bedroom flat and then had a kid, you'd want to move to a bigger place. Or if you split up with your partner, you wouldn't want to be stuck living together forever. If you lost your job, or your partner died, or something else like that happened, then you might need to downsize to a smaller place.

Buying larger property in a down market is actually cheaper. That said if you can't sell yours then you are still screwed!!

I also want to buy just one home and stay put for as long as I want - or until I retire, at least - but the world doesn't always let you do what you want.

Agree about the world and stuff but I guess we have to take some risks.
 
Rent to HomeBuy Scheme

Thread bump

How the Rent to HomeBuy scheme works

Your local HomeBuy agent will assess your eligibility for the scheme and then look at the options available in your area. There are certain newly built properties that you can rent at an affordable rate - 80 per cent (or less) of the market rent. You can rent the property for up to five years.

The Rent to HomeBuy scheme is designed to give you time to save enough money for a deposit to buy the property. You’ll have the first option to buy the property at any time during the tenancy, or at the end.

Link here
 
Just living somewhere where I know I can't be turfed out at a couple of weeks notice on the whim of someone I've never even met, would be a huge step up in the world for me...

This ^ ^

I am sure that people will find flaws in the scheme but it will be a damn sight more secure than a normal private let. I have been at my place for 18 months and can't personalise it past a few pictures on the walls. Equally I know that my landlord is struggling financially right now so just do not feel 'at home' at all.
 
Posted this two years ago and little to nothing has changed has it?
I would guess that this is not a major Tory policy either!

Some developers are now offering this scheme to shift properties but they are hardly doing it as a not-for-profit agreement. There are some private companies setting up schemes but you still need too large a deposit IMO at the end of the rental period. Any other people think that they will still be renting for a very long time to come?
 
I know that a few HAs really went for it a few years back, building shared ownership flats (which count towards the social housing build figures) and have been left with a lot they can't sell, and becuase of the funding, they have difficulties allowing them to be rented as part of the social housing rented sector !

craziness
 
They so need to do more about this... the situation is absurd. I mean, I was only able to buy because I inherited enough to make a reasonable deposit. I was thinking recently that had I not had that money, I would have been living with my parents saving money for a deposit, probably for 5 years or more. And if I'd still gone and met gsv, we would have only had about a 10% deposit and had a monster mortage to get a two-bed place together.

If you add people now generally having massive student debts to that - it simply isn't sustainable.
 
Back
Top Bottom