removal of israelis (compensation)

[GarfieldLeChat]

Az tagid li schmendrik, eyfor garta b'zman she'hyita shama? Yaatza bichlal m'Tel Aviv? Yesh lecha musag ma zeh midbah? Ata lo yodeh she'ha'Negev hu 60 achuz mi'ha'medina. Schlemiel

well done the right wing yank has learn some stock phrases in hebrew....

well done..

fuck off troll boy, we all know your game and why you play it you haven't changed in 4 years except in name...

pk you remember the stratgist the one whihc got you and frogwoman fighting in the first place ... don't be arguing with their muppet kind again really...

 

[pk]

Az tagid li schmendrik, eyfor garta b'zman she'hyita shama? Yaatza bichlal m'Tel Aviv? Yesh lecha musag ma zeh midbah? Ata lo yodeh she'ha'Negev hu 60 achuz mi'ha'medina. Schlemiel

Cuss emeck, benzona maniac.

Guess you can apprieciate that you were wrong about your jumping to incorrect conclusions over my Wales comment now then, eh?

 

[pk]

pk you remember the stratgist the one whihc got you and frogwoman fighting in the first place ... don't be arguing with their muppet kind again really...

After reading this thread - you're hardly in a position to tell me not to argue with anyone now are you!?

Either here or anywhere else!

Besides, I love a good barney, me. Passes the time...

 

[ViolentPanda]

Come on, it's not a matter of dyslexia. The guy uses highly emotive and threatening language on numerous occasions, he seems to have a persecution paranoia, etc. This guy is wacko.

I'd hardly use "emotive language" as a delineator of mental state.
If you are indeed "Golem" I remember you getting into similar states where you deployed "emotive language" on a regular basis.
As I said in a previous post though, your's is an unqualified psychological assessment and therefore has all the validity of a wet tea-bag. It's a case of "well you would say that, wouldn't you?".

Do you mean "So, is it an accurate assessment or not?"?

Accurate assessment of what?

Was GLCs listing of different identities and the ideology and information that those identities promulgated an accurate assessment of your history of interaction on and with this site and its users under many different usernames?

 

[energy]

I give up

 

[energy]

I'd hardly use "emotive language" as a delineator of mental state.

Taken all together it is.

As I said in a previous post though, your's is an unqualified psychological assessment and therefore has all the validity of a wet tea-bag.

If I see someone walking down the street in a highly dishevelled manner while talking to an invisible person walking next to them, occasionally shouting out loud and gesticulating at this invisible person, can we make an assumption that the person in question has mental problems of some sort? You don't need to be a shrink to make such an assumption. All you need to do is open your eyes.

It's the same with Garfield's writing. You don't need to be a shrink to identify that he's wacko FFS.

 

[pk]

promulgated

Blimey! Nice one!

 

[GarfieldLeChat]

Taken all together it is.






If I see someone walking down the street in a highly dishevelled manner while talking to an invisible person walking next to them, occasionally shouting out loud and gesticulating at this invisible person, can we make an assumption that the person in question has mental problems of some sort? You don't need to be a shrink to make such an assumption. All you need to do is open your eyes.

It's the same with Garfield's writing. You don't need to be a shrink to identify that he's wacko FFS.

yet funnliy enough you cannot deny what the wako has said why is that ... ???

if it's so plain and simple just say so...

but you can't cuaght red handed and totally unpreparred as each and everytime ... back under your bridge trolly back under your bridge...

 

[ViolentPanda]

Taken all together it is.

If I see someone walking down the street in a highly dishevelled manner while talking to an invisible person walking next to them, occasionally shouting out loud and gesticulating at this invisible person, can we make an assumption that the person in question has mental problems of some sort? You don't need to be a shrink to make such an assumption. All you need to do is open your eyes.

I'd assume he was a method actor researching the lead role for the remake of "Serpico" just as quickly as I'd make an assumption about someone's mental state.
It's called being non-judgemental. Try it sometime.

It's the same with Garfield's writing. You don't need to be a shrink to identify that he's wacko FFS.

Actually, yes you do need to be a shrink to identify if someone is "wacko", ffs.

 

[energy]

I'd assume he was a method actor researching the lead role for the remake of "Serpico" just as quickly as I'd make an assumption about someone's mental state.

Sure you would.

It's called being non-judgemental. Try it sometime.

That's real rich

Actually, yes you do need to be a shrink to identify if someone is "wacko", ffs.

No, human's have all sorts of built-in mechanisms for detecting behavioral traits of others. You don't need to be a shrink, only human.

 

[ViolentPanda]

Sure you would.

I'm one of those people who has spent most of their life being judged on their appearance, so don't tell me what I would or wouldn't do, because you don't know.
You've based your entire argument (to give credit to a threadbare piece of prejudice that it doesn't actually deserve) on the assumption that your point of view on this matter is correct and that everyone should agree with you.
Such behaviour has as much that would recommend it as "wacko" as anything GLC has manifested.

That's real rich

Why is it "rich", my judgemental friend?
Is it "rich" because ou disagree? If so then why not refte the point properly rather than taking the pbman route of deploying the smiley?

No, human's have all sorts of built-in mechanisms for detecting behavioral traits of others. You don't need to be a shrink, only human.

No, you have to be a shrink to correctly identify a psychiatric pathology, anything else is uneducated or partilally-informed guesswork. Your "inbuilt mechanisms" warn you that something may be wrong, they do not define the nature of the possible wrongness.

If you're going to attempt an argument at least have the self-respect and dignity not to make such a piss-awful job as you have done, eh?

 

[energy]

Your "inbuilt mechanisms" warn you that something may be wrong, they do not define the nature of the possible wrongness.

Well my alarm bells are ringing at high volume about GLC, and I'd rather trust my own judgement than that of someone on the Internet.

(And before someone points out that hearing non-existant alarm bells are a sign of mental illness, no, I don't actually have a ringing sound in my head. )

 

[maomao]

The alarm bells you're talking about. They're the ones that ensure I always recognise you within your first few posts.

 

[ViolentPanda]

(And before someone points out that hearing non-existant alarm bells are a sign of mental illness, no, I don't actually have a ringing sound in my head. )

I'm glad to hear it. Tinnitus can be a real bastard of a condition.

 

[GarfieldLeChat]

Well my alarm bells are ringing at high volume

yes that'd be the early warning troll sensors we have had set up around the urban perimeter ...


any way sucessfu derail by troll in progress which has meant that the troll has prevented further discussion of topic which is their selfish intent, let's not feed this monkey fucker any more than i regrettfully have already done